Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:15:24.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-mutualistic morality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Sonya Sachdeva ,
Rumen Iliev  and
Douglas L. Medin
Sonya Sachdeva
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. [email protected]@[email protected]://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/medin/
Rumen Iliev
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. [email protected]@[email protected]://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/medin/
Douglas L. Medin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208. [email protected]@[email protected]://groups.psych.northwestern.edu/medin/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although mutually advantageous cooperative strategies might be an apt account of some societies, other moral systems might be needed among certain groups and contexts. In particular, in a duty-based moral system, people do not behave morally with an expectation for proportional reward, but rather, as a fulfillment of debt owed to others. In such systems, mutualistic motivations are not necessarily a key component of morality.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 99 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P. (1974) Lineages of the absolutist state. The Bath Press/Verso.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1994) Cultural diversity in the morality of caring: Individually oriented versus duty-based interpersonal moral codes. Cross-Cultural Research 28(1):3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. G. & Bersoff, D. M. (1992) Culture and moral judgment: How are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(4):541–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moghaddam, F. M., Slocum, N. R., Finkel, N., Mor, T. & Harre, R. (2000) Toward a cultural theory of duties. Culture Psychology 6(3):275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Flaherty, W. D. & Derrett, J. D. M., ed. (1978) The concept of duty in South Asia. Vikas/School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M. & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 128(1):3–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachdeva, S. (2010) The norm of self-sacrifice. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (1996) True ethnography: The lore, the law, and the lure. In: Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry, ed. Jessor, R., Colby, A. & Shweder, R. A., pp. 15–52. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M. & Miller, J. G. (1987) Culture and moral development. In: The emergence of moral concepts in young children, ed. Kagan, J. & Lamb, S., pp. 1–83. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar