No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Movement vigor: Frameworks, exceptions, and nomenclature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2021
Abstract
Shadmehr and Ahmed cogently argue that vigor of appetitive movements is positively correlated with their value, and that value can therefore be inferred by measuring vigor. Here, we highlight three points to consider when interpreting this account: (1) The correlation between vigor and value is not obligatory, (2) the vigor effect also arises in frameworks other than optimal foraging, and (3) the term vigor can be misinterpreted, thereby affecting rigor.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Target article
Précis of Vigor: Neuroeconomics of Movement Control
Related commentaries (14)
A role of serotonin and the insula in vigor: Tracking environmental and physiological resources
Construction of Roman roads toward neuroeconomics
Costs and benefits of communicating vigor
Foundational assumption reasonable but uncertain
How not to answer interdisciplinary “Why?” questions
Movement vigor: Frameworks, exceptions, and nomenclature
Moving fast and seeing slow? The visual consequences of vigorous movement
Quantum decision corrections for the neuroeconomics of irrational movement control and goal attainment
Reducing behavioral dimensions to study brain–environment interactions
Thoughts on vigor in the motor and cognitive domains
Time and the decider
Vigor and aspiration levels in neuroeconomics
Vigor of reactive postural responses is set from feedback and feedforward processes
Why we don't move: The importance of somatic maintenance and resting
Author response
Movement control, decision-making, and the building of Roman roads to link them