Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:08:16.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

It takes more to forgive: The role of executive control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Johan C. Karremans  and
Reine C. van der Wal
Johan C. Karremans
Affiliation:
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [email protected]://www.ru.nl/socialpsychology/faculty/dr_johan_karremans/[email protected]://www.ru.nl/socialpsychology/phd-students/reine-van-der-wal/
Reine C. van der Wal
Affiliation:
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. [email protected]://www.ru.nl/socialpsychology/faculty/dr_johan_karremans/[email protected]://www.ru.nl/socialpsychology/phd-students/reine-van-der-wal/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article's evolutionary approach provides an excellent framework for understanding when and why people retaliate or forgive. We argue that recent findings on the basic processes in forgiveness – particularly, the role of executive control – can further refine the authors' proposed model. Specifically, the lack of executive control may restrict the explanatory power of relationship value and exploitation risk.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Finkel, E. J. & Campbell, W. K. (2001) Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81:263–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M. & Hannon, P. A. (2002) Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6):956–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P. & Hewitt, J. K. (2008) Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137:201–25.Google Scholar
Karremans, J. C. & Aarts, H. (2007) The role of automaticity in determining the inclination to forgive close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:902–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karremans, J. C., Regalia, C., Paleari, F. G., Finham, F. D., Cui, M., Takada, N., Ohbuchi, K., Terzino, K., Cross, S. E. & Uskul, A. K. (2011) Maintaining harmony across the globe: The cross-cultural association between closeness and interpersonal forgiveness. Social Psychology and Personality Science 2:443–51.Google Scholar
Pronk, T. M., Karremans, J. C., Overbeek, G., Vermuist, A. A. & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2010) What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(1):119–31.Google Scholar
Van der Wal, R. C., Karremans, J. C. & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012) A dual-process perspective on interpersonal forgiveness. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Watts, D. P. (2006) Conflict resolution in chimpanzees and the valuable-relationships hypothesis International Journal of Primatology 27:1337–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D. & Troop-Gordon, W. (2010) How does cognitive control reduce anger and aggression? The role of conflict monitoring and forgiveness processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98(5):830–40. doi: 10.1037/a0018962Google Scholar