No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Chances and challenges for an active visual search perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 May 2017
Abstract
Using fixations as the fundamental unit of visual search is an appealing gear change in a paradigm that has long dominated attention research. To truly inform theories of search, however, additional challenges must be faced, including (1) an empirically motivated definition of fixation in the presence of fixational saccades and (2) the biases and limitations of transsaccadic perception and memory.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Bays, P. M. & Husain, M. (2008) Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science
321(5890):851–54. doi: 10.1126/science.1158023.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, P., Hunt, A. R., Afraz, A. & Rolfs, M. (2010) Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers. Trends in Cognitive Science
14(4):147–53.Google Scholar
Engbert, R. & Kliegl, R. (2003) Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research
43(9):1035–45. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1.Google Scholar
Hafed, Z. M. (2011) Mechanisms for generating and compensating for the smallest possible saccades. European Journal of Neuroscience
33(11):2101–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07694.x.Google Scholar
Hafed, Z. M. & Clark, J. J. (2002) Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts. Vision Research
42(22):2533–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafed, Z. M., Goffart, L. & Krauzlis, R. J. (2009) A neural mechanism for microsaccade generation in the primate superior colliculus. Science
323(5916):940–43.Google Scholar
Irwin, D. E. (1991) Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology
23(3):420–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonikaitis, D., Szinte, M., Rolfs, M. & Cavanagh, P. (2013) Allocation of attention across saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology
109(5):1425–34.Google Scholar
Ko, H.-K., Poletti, M. & Rucci, M. (2010) Microsaccades precisely relocate gaze in a high visual acuity task. Nature Neuroscience
13(12):1549–53. doi: 10.1038/nn.2663.Google Scholar
Mirpour, K. & Bisley, J. W. (2012) Anticipatory remapping of attentional priority across the entire visual field. Journal of Neuroscience
32(46):16449–57.Google Scholar
Ohl, S., Brandt, S. A. & Kliegl, R. (2011) Secondary (micro-)saccades: The influence of primary saccade end point and target eccentricity on the process of postsaccadic fixation. Vision Research
51(23–24):2340–47. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.005.Google Scholar
Rolfs, M. (2009) Microsaccades: Small steps on a long way. Vision Research
49(20):2415–41. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.010.Google Scholar
Rolfs, M., Jonikaitis, D., Deubel, H. & Cavanagh, P. (2011) Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements. Nature Neuroscience
14(2):252–56. doi: 10.1038/nn.2711.Google Scholar
Rolfs, M., Kliegl, R. & Engbert, R. (2008) Toward a model of microsaccade generation: The case of microsaccadic inhibition. Journal of Vision
8(11):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurtz, R. H. (2008) Neuronal mechanisms of visual stability. Vision Research
48(20):2070–89. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.021.Google Scholar
Yuval-Greenberg, S., Merriam, E. P. & Heeger, D. J. (2014) Spontaneous microsaccades reflect shifts in covert attention. Journal of Neuroscience
34(41):13693–700. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0582-14.2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
The impending demise of the item in visual search
Related commentaries (30)
An appeal against the item's death sentence: Accounting for diagnostic data patterns with an item-based model of visual search
Analysing real-world visual search tasks helps explain what the functional visual field is, and what its neural mechanisms are
Chances and challenges for an active visual search perspective
Cognitive architecture enables comprehensive predictive models of visual search
Contextual and social cues may dominate natural visual search
Don't admit defeat: A new dawn for the item in visual search
Eye movements are an important part of the story, but not the whole story
Feature integration, attention, and fixations during visual search
Fixations are not all created equal: An objection to mindless visual search
Gaze-contingent manipulation of the FVF demonstrates the importance of fixation duration for explaining search behavior
How functional are functional viewing fields?
Item-based selection is in good shape in visual compound search: A view from electrophysiology
Looking further! The importance of embedding visual search in action
Mathematical fixation: Search viewed through a cognitive lens
Oh, the number of things you will process (in parallel)!
Parallel attentive processing and pre-attentive guidance
Scanning movements during haptic search: similarity with fixations during visual search
Searching for unity: Real-world versus item-based visual search in age-related eye disease
Set size slope still does not distinguish parallel from serial search
Task implementation and top-down control in continuous search
The FVF framework and target prevalence effects
The FVF might be influenced by object-based attention
The “item” as a window into how prior knowledge guides visual search
Those pernicious items
Until the demise of the functional field of view
What fixations reveal about oculomotor scanning behavior in visual search
Where the item still rules supreme: Time-based selection, enumeration, pre-attentive processing and the target template?
Why the item will remain the unit of attentional selection in visual search
“I am not dead yet!” – The Item responds to Hulleman & Olivers
“Target-absent” decisions in cancer nodule detection are more efficient than “target-present” decisions!
Author response
On the brink: The demise of the item in visual search moves closer