Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:53:28.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Baumard et al.'s moral markets lack market dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Daniel M. T. Fessler  and
Colin Holbrook
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Affiliation:
Center for Behavior, Evolution, & Culture, and Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1553. [email protected]://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fessler/[email protected]://cholbrook01.bol.ucla.edu/
Colin Holbrook
Affiliation:
Center for Behavior, Evolution, & Culture, and Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1553. [email protected]://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fessler/[email protected]://cholbrook01.bol.ucla.edu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Market models are indeed indispensable to understanding the evolution of cooperation and its emotional substrates. Unfortunately, Baumard et al. eschew market thinking in stressing the supposed invariance of moral/cooperative behavior across circumstances. To the contrary, humans display contingent morality/cooperation, and these shifts are best accounted for by market models of partner choice for mutually beneficial collaboration.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 89 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fessler, D. & Haley, K. (2003) The strategy of affect: Emotions in human cooperation. In: Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation: Dahlem Workshop Report 90, ed. Hammerstein, P., pp. 7–36. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2000) The positive emotion of elevation. Prevention and Treatment 3, article 3c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2003) Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In: Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived, ed. Keyes, C. L. M. & Haidt, J., pp. 275–89. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S. & Steg, L. (2008) The spreading of disorder. Science 332:1681–85.Google Scholar
Raihani, N. J. & Hart, T. (2010) Free-riders promote free-riding in a real-world setting. Oikos 119:1391–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnall, S., Roper, J. & Fessler, D. M. T. (2010) Elevation leads to altruistic behavior, above and beyond general positive affect. Psychological Science 21:315–20.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., O'Brien, D. T. & Sesma, A. (2009) Human prosociality from an evolutionary perspective: Variation and correlations at a city-wide scale. Evolution and Human Behavior 30:190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar