No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Another claim for cognitive history
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2020
Abstract
History can help refine the resource-rational model by uncovering how cultural and cognitive forces act together to shape decision-making. Specifically, history reveals how the meanings of key terms like “problem” and “solution” shift over time. Studying choices in their cultural contexts illuminates how changing perceptions of the decision-making process affect how choices are made on the ground.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020
References
Brown, P. (2012) Through the eye of a needle: Wealth, the fall of Rome, and the making of Christianity in the West, 350−550 AD. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. (2015) The ransom of the soul: Afterlife and wealth in early western Christianity. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, R. (1984) The great cat massacre and other episodes in French cultural history. Vintage.Google Scholar
d'Avray, D. L. (2010) Rationalities in history: A Weberian essay in comparison. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diggins, J. P. (1978) The bard of savagery: Thorstein Veblen and modern social theory. Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Kreiner, J. (2014) The social life of hagiography in the Merovingian kingdom. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2006) An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, M. (2017) The great cat mutilation: Sex, social movements and the utilitarian calculus in 1970s New York City. BJHS: Themes 2:57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymer, E. J. (2013) A man of his time: Thorstein Veblen and the University of Chicago Darwinists. Journal of the History of Biology 46(4):669–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilman, R. (1991) Thorstein Veblen and his critics, 1891–1963: Conservative, liberal, and radical perspectives. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1899) The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Wood, I. (2013) Entrusting western Europe to the Church, 400-750. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 23:37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources
Related commentaries (25)
Another claim for cognitive history
Beginning with biology: “Aspects of cognition” exist in the service of the brain's overall function as a resource-regulator
Can resources save rationality? “Anti-Bayesian” updating in cognition and perception
Cognitively bounded rational analyses and the crucial role of theories of subjective utility
Computational limits don't fully explain human cognitive limitations
Generalization of the resource-rationality principle to neural control of goal-directed movements
Heuristics and the naturalistic fallacy
Holistic resource-rational analysis
Multiple conceptions of resource rationality
Opportunities and challenges integrating resource-rational analysis with developmental perspectives
Opportunities for emotion and mental health research in the resource-rationality framework
Optimal, resource-rational or sub-optimal? Insights from cognitive development
Representing utility and deploying the body
Resource-rational analysis versus resource-rational humans
Resource-rationality and dynamic coupling of brains and social environments
Resource-rationality as a normative standard of human rationality
Resource-rationality beyond individual minds: the case of interactive language use
Sampling as a resource-rational constraint
The biology of emotion is missing
The evolutionary foundations of resource-rational analysis
The importance of constraints on constraints
Towards a quantum-like cognitive architecture for decision-making
Uncovering cognitive constraints is the bottleneck in resource-rational analysis
What are the appropriate axioms of rationality for reasoning under uncertainty with resource-constrained systems?
What is the purpose of cognition?
Author response
Advancing rational analysis to the algorithmic level