Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:07:18.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

To kill a bee: The aptness and moralistic heuristics of reactive attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Hugo Viciana
Affiliation:
Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados, CSIC, Plaza Campo Santo de los Mártires, 7, 14004, Cordoba, [email protected]@iesa.csic.eswww.hugoviciana.net
Antonio Gaitán
Affiliation:
Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Calle Madrid, 126, 28903 Getafe (Madrid) España. [email protected]
Fernando Aguiar
Affiliation:
Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados, CSIC, Plaza Campo Santo de los Mártires, 7, 14004, Cordoba, [email protected]@iesa.csic.eswww.hugoviciana.net

Abstract

Although we are sensitive to the advantages of reactive attitudes as a starting point, we are concerned that confusion on the level of analysis can easily plague this type of account. We argue that what is needed here is a serious appraisal of the effects on the promotion of values of moralistic responses toward different types of agency.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. & Angeletos, G.-M. (2005) Fairness and redistribution. The American Economic Review 95(4):960–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Crittenden, A. N., Fessler, D. M. T., Fitzpatrick, S., Gurven, M., Henrich, J., Kanovsky, M., Kushnick, G., Pisorf, A., Scelzaa, B.A., Stichl, S., von Ruedenn, C., Zhaoh, W. & Laurence, S. (2016) Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(17):4688–93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522070113.Google Scholar
Benabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2006) Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2):699746.Google Scholar
D'Arms, J. & Jacobson, D. (2000) The moralistic fallacy: On the “appropriateness” of emotions. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61(1):6590.Google Scholar
Debove, S., Baumard, N. & André, J.-B. (2015) Evolution of equal division among unequal partners. Evolution 69(2):561–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12583.Google Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2015b). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, D. M. & Holbrook, C. (2013) Baumard et al.'s moral markets lack market dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(1):8990.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. & Rai, T. S. (2014) Virtuous violence: Hurting and killing to create, sustain, end, and honor social relationships. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1988) Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. Norton.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. (2012) On the evolutionary origins of the egalitarian syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(35):14069–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacquet, J. (2015) Is shame necessary? New uses for an old tool. Vintage.Google Scholar
Jacquet, J., Hauert, C., Traulsen, A. & Milinski, M. (2011) Shame and honour drive cooperation. Biology Letters 7:899901. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, N. (2011) Hard luck: How luck undermines free will and moral responsibility. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Penguin.Google Scholar
Morris, I. (2015) Foragers, farmers, and fossil fuels: How human values evolve. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2011) The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. Viking Books.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (2013) Interpreting blame. In: Blame. Its nature and norms, ed. Coates, J. & Tognazzini, N., pp. 8499. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weeden, J. & Kurzban, R. (2014) The hidden agenda of the political mind: How self-interest shapes our opinions and why we won't admit it. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar