No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“Self-sacrifice” as an accidental outcome of extreme within-group mutualism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
Whitehouse makes no room for evolutionary approaches to extreme behaviors based on partner choice and mutualism, which have been convincingly invoked to make sense of ordinary morality. Extended to intergroup warfare, these evolutionary mechanisms may play a pivotal role in explaining the existence of extreme – though not functionally sacrificial – behaviors, benefiting non-kin fellow fighters, together with the distinctive phenomenology those behaviors display.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
Alexander, R. (1987) The biology of moral systems (foundations of human behavior). Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (2010) Talking to the enemy: Violent extremism, sacred values, and what it means to be human. Penguin.Google Scholar
Barclay, P. & Willer, R. (2007) Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274(1610):749–53.Google Scholar
Baumard, N. (2011) Punishment is not a group adaptation: Humans punish to restore fairness rather than to support group cooperation. Mind and Society 10(1):1–26.Google Scholar
Baumard, N., André, J.-B & Sperber, D. (2013) A mutualistic theory of morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36:59–122.Google Scholar
Baumard, N. & Boyer, P. (2013) Explaining moral religions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(6):272–80.Google Scholar
Everett, J. A., Pizarro, D. A. & Crockett, M. J. (2016) Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145(6):772–87.Google Scholar
Frank, R. (1988) Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions, vol. 1. Norton.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2012) The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F., Patton, J. Q., Smith, N. & Tracer, D. (2005) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6):795–815.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S. A. & Register, K. (2003) Constant battles: The myth of the peaceful, noble savage. St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Pradel, J., Euler, H. A. & Fetchenhauer, D. (2008) Spotting altruistic dictator game players and mingling with them: The elective assortation of classmates. Evolution and Human Behavior 30(2):103–13.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Baumard, N. (2012) Moral and reputation in an evolutionary perspective. Mind and Language 27(5):495–518.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2010) Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In: Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives, ed. Høgh-Olesen, H., pp. 191–234. Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35–57.Google Scholar
Target article
Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice
Related commentaries (29)
A potential explanation for self-radicalisation
Accumulative fusion and the issue of age: Reconciling the model with the data
Altruism, collective rationality, and extreme self-sacrifice
Communal sharing/identity fusion does not require reflection on episodic memory of shared experience or trauma – and usually generates kindness
Considering selection pressures for identity fusion and self-sacrifice in small-scale societies
Does identity fusion give rise to the group – or the reverse? Politics- versus community-based groups
Dying for your group or for your faith? On the power of belief
Extreme self-sacrifice beyond fusion: Moral expansiveness and the special case of allyship
Identity fusion and fitness interdependence
Identity fusion “in the wild”: Moving toward or away from a general theory of identity fusion?
Individual difference in acts of self-sacrifice
Individuals, traditions, and the righteous
Motivational (con)fusion: Identity fusion does not quell personal self-interest
Origins of social fusion
Segregation and belief polarization as boundary conditions for when fusion leads to self-sacrifice
Self-sacrifice as a social signal
Self-sacrifice for a cause: The role of ideas and beliefs in motivating human conflict
Self-sacrifice for in-group's history: A diachronic perspective
Strength in numbers: A survival strategy that helps explain social bonding and commitment
The analytic utility of distinguishing fighting from dying
The fire burns within: Individual motivations for self-sacrifice
The importance of environmental threats and ideology in explaining extreme self-sacrifice
The motivation to sacrifice for a cause reflects a basic cognitive bias
The power of norms to sway fused group members
The role of entitativity in perpetuating cycles of violence
Toward a more comprehensive theory of self-sacrificial violence
What fuses sports fans?
What motivates devoted actors to extreme sacrifice, identity fusion, or sacred values?
“Self-sacrifice” as an accidental outcome of extreme within-group mutualism
Author response
Four things we need to know about extreme self-sacrifice