Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:04:38.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A potential explanation for self-radicalisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Justin E. Lane Open the ORCID record for Justin E. Lane [Opens in a new window] ,
F. LeRon Shults  and
Wesley J. Wildman
Justin E. Lane
Affiliation:
Institute for Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PN, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.researchgate.net/profile/Justin_Lane NORCE Center for Modeling Social Systems, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway LEVYNA, Masaryk University, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic Center for Mind and Culture, Boston, MA 02215. www.mindandculture.org
F. LeRon Shults
Affiliation:
NORCE Center for Modeling Social Systems, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway Institute of Religion, Philosophy and History, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway. [email protected]://www.leronshults.com/
Wesley J. Wildman
Affiliation:
Center for Mind and Culture, Boston, MA 02215. www.mindandculture.org Boston University School of Theology, Boston, MA 02215. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We believe that Whitehouse's model could be extended in a way that can help us make sense of self-radicalised individuals who are not active in cliques. We believe that conceptual ties may be important to this process and present a brief analysis of a database collected by the national consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), to suggest future research to complement Whitehouse's proposal.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M. & Nelson, G. (1991) Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(2):241–53.Google Scholar
Atran, S., Axelrod, R. & Davis, R. (2007) Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science 317(5841):1039–40. doi: 10.1126/science.1144241.Google Scholar
Baker, A. & Santora, M. (2015, December 16) San Bernardino attackers discussed jihad in private messages, F.B.I. says. The New York Times, pp. 2–4. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/17/us/san-bernardino-attackers-discussed-jihad-in-private-messages-fbi-says.html.Google Scholar
Chappell, B. (2013, April 28) Tamerlan Tsarnaev spoke of jihad with mother, reports say. National Public Radio. Available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/04/28/179611079/tamerlan-tsarnaev-spoke-of-jihad-with-mother-reports-say.Google Scholar
Hodges, S. D, Sharp, C. A., Gibson, N. J. S. & Tipsord, J. M. (2013) Nearer my God to thee: Self–God overlap and believers' relationships with God. Self and Identity 12(3):337–56. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2012.674212.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. A., Atwell Seate, A. & James, P. A. (2018) Radicalization to violence: A pathway approach to studying extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence. Published online April 9, 2018. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2018.1442330.Google Scholar
Mashek, D. J., Aron, A. & Boncimino, M. (2003) Confusions of self with close others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(3):382–92 doi: 10.1177/0146167202250220.Google Scholar
National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (2018) Explore the data. Available at: http://www.start.umd.edu/profiles-individual-radicalization-united-states-pirus-keshif.Google Scholar
Sharp, C. A., Rentfrow, P. J. & Gibson, N. J. S. (2015) One God but three concepts: Complexity in Christians' representations of God. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 9(1):95–105. doi: 10.1037/rel0000053.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. & Henry, S. (1996) An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(6):635–42.Google Scholar