Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:18:47.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The paradox of the missing function: How similar is moral mutualism to biofunctional understanding?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Asghar Iran-Nejad  and
Fareed Bordbar
Asghar Iran-Nejad
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487. [email protected]@gmail.com
Fareed Bordbar
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487. [email protected]@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We explain here how the natural selection theory of people's mutualistic sense of fairness and the biofunctional theory of human understanding are made for each other. We welcome the stage that the target article has already set for this convergence, and invite the authors to consider moving the two independently developed approaches a step closer to the natural selection level of biofunctional understanding.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 93 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Iran-Nejad, A. (1978) An anatomic account of knowing. Unpublished Master's Thesis equivalency paper, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A. (1990) Active and dynamic self-regulation of learning processes. Review of Educational Research 60:573–602.Google Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A. (2000) Knowledge, self-regulation, and the brain–mind cycle of reflection. Journal of Mind and Behavior 21:67–88.Google Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A. & Chissom, B. S. (1992) Contributions of active and dynamic self-regulation to learning. Innovative Higher Education 17:125–36.Google Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A. & Gregg, M. (2001) The brain–mind cycle of reflection. Teachers College Record 103:868–95.Google Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A. & Gregg, M. (2011) The nonsegmental context of segmental understanding: A biofunctional systems perspective. American Journal of Educational Studies 4(1):41–60.Google Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A., Marsh, G. E. & Clements, A. C. (1992) The figure and the ground of constructive brain functioning: Beyond explicit memory processes. Educational Psychologist 27:473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A. & Stewart, W. (2010a) First-person education and the biofunctional nature of knowing, understanding, and affect. In: Multiple perspectives on problem solving and learning in the digital age, ed. Ifenthaler, D., Kinshuk, D., Isaias, P., Sampson, D. G. & Spector, J. M., pp. 89–109. Springer.Google Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A. & Stewart, W. (2010b) Understanding as an educational objective: From seeking and playing with taxonomies to discovering and reflecting on revelations. Research in the Schools 17(1):64–76.Google Scholar
Iran-Nejad, A. & Stewart, W. (2011) Understanding knowing and its relation to understanding. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference of the American Institute of Higher Education, Charleston, SC, April 6–8, 2011.Google Scholar