No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Oh, the number of things you will process (in parallel)!
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 May 2017
Abstract
We highlight the importance of considering the variance produced during the parallel processing stage in vision and present a case for why it is useful to consider the “item” as a meaningful unit of study when investigating early visual processing in visual search tasks.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Balas, B., Nakano, L. & Rosenholtz, R. (2009) A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. Journal of Vision
9(12):13, 1–18.Google Scholar
Bravo, M. J. & Nakayama, K. (1992) The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception and Psychophysics
51:465–72. doi: 10.3758/BF03211642.Google Scholar
Buetti, S., Cronin, D. A., Madison, A. M., Wang, Z. & Lleras, A. (2016) Towards a better understanding of parallel visual processing in human vision: Evidence for exhaustive analysis of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
145(6):672–707.Google Scholar
Ester, E. F., Klee, D. & Awh, E. (2013) Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
40(3):1022–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Ester, E. F., Zilber, E. & Serences, J. T. (2015) Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors. Journal of Vision
15(1):4, 1–12.Google Scholar
Lamy, D. & Kristjánsson, A. (2013) Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A Review. Journal of Vision
13(3):14, 1–19.Google Scholar
Li, W., Piëch, V. & Gilbert, C. D. (2004) Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience
7(6):651–57.Google Scholar
Li, W., Piëch, V. & Gilbert, C. D. (2006) Contour saliency in primary visual cortex. Neuron
50(6):951–62.Google Scholar
Neider, M. B. & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008) Exploring set size effects in scenes: Identifying the objects of search. Visual Cognition
16(1):1–10.Google Scholar
Rosenholtz, R., Huang, J., Raj, A., Balas, B. J. & Ilie, L. (2012b) A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. Journal of Vision
12(4):14, 1–17. doi: 10.1167/12.4.14.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. M. (1994) Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
1(2):202–38.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G. A., Rosenholtz, R. E., Kuzmova, Y. I. & Sherman, A. M. (2011a) Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
73:1650–71. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0153-3.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, G. J. (2008) A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review
115:787–835. doi: 10.1037/a0013118.Google Scholar
Target article
The impending demise of the item in visual search
Related commentaries (30)
An appeal against the item's death sentence: Accounting for diagnostic data patterns with an item-based model of visual search
Analysing real-world visual search tasks helps explain what the functional visual field is, and what its neural mechanisms are
Chances and challenges for an active visual search perspective
Cognitive architecture enables comprehensive predictive models of visual search
Contextual and social cues may dominate natural visual search
Don't admit defeat: A new dawn for the item in visual search
Eye movements are an important part of the story, but not the whole story
Feature integration, attention, and fixations during visual search
Fixations are not all created equal: An objection to mindless visual search
Gaze-contingent manipulation of the FVF demonstrates the importance of fixation duration for explaining search behavior
How functional are functional viewing fields?
Item-based selection is in good shape in visual compound search: A view from electrophysiology
Looking further! The importance of embedding visual search in action
Mathematical fixation: Search viewed through a cognitive lens
Oh, the number of things you will process (in parallel)!
Parallel attentive processing and pre-attentive guidance
Scanning movements during haptic search: similarity with fixations during visual search
Searching for unity: Real-world versus item-based visual search in age-related eye disease
Set size slope still does not distinguish parallel from serial search
Task implementation and top-down control in continuous search
The FVF framework and target prevalence effects
The FVF might be influenced by object-based attention
The “item” as a window into how prior knowledge guides visual search
Those pernicious items
Until the demise of the functional field of view
What fixations reveal about oculomotor scanning behavior in visual search
Where the item still rules supreme: Time-based selection, enumeration, pre-attentive processing and the target template?
Why the item will remain the unit of attentional selection in visual search
“I am not dead yet!” – The Item responds to Hulleman & Olivers
“Target-absent” decisions in cancer nodule detection are more efficient than “target-present” decisions!
Author response
On the brink: The demise of the item in visual search moves closer