Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:49:01.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “item” as a window into how prior knowledge guides visual search

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2017

Rachel Wu  and
Jiaying Zhao
Rachel Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA92521. [email protected]
Jiaying Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We challenge the central idea proposed in Hulleman & Olivers (H&O) by arguing that the “item” is still useful for understanding visual search and for developing new theoretical frameworks. The “item” is a flexible unit that represents not only an individual object, but also a bundle of objects that are grouped based on prior knowledge. Uncovering how the “item” is represented based on prior knowledge is essential for advancing theories of visual search.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e162
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, T. F., Konkle, T. & Alvarez, G. A. (2009) Compression in visual working memory: Using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138:487–502.Google Scholar
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T. & Alvarez, G. A. (2011) A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. Journal of Vision 11:1–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiser, J. & Aslin, R. N. (2001) Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science 12:499–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiser, J. & Aslin, R. N. (2002) Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(24):15822–26.Google Scholar
Hall, M., Mattingley, J. & Dux, P. (2015) Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 41:1112–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A. & Johnson, S. P. (2002) Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition 83:B35–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mole, C. & Zhao, J. (2016) Vision and abstraction: An empirical refutation of Nico Orlandi's non-cognitivism. Philosophical Psychology 29:365–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nako, R., Smith, T. J. & Eimer, M. (2015) Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27:902–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nako, R., Wu, R. & Eimer, M. (2014a) Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40(1):50–60.Google Scholar
Nako, R., Wu, R., Smith, T. J. & Eimer, M. (2014b) Item and category-based attentional control during search for real-world objects: Can you find the pants among the pans? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40(4):1283–88.Google Scholar
Olivers, C. N., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R. & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011) Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(7):327–34.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274:1926–28.Google Scholar
Schapiro, A. C., Kustner, L. V. & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2012) Shaping of object representations in the human medial temporal lobe based on temporal regularities. Current Biology 22:1622–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A. & Scholl, B. J. (2005) The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134:552–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, R., Gopnik, A., Richardson, D. C. & Kirkham, N. Z. (2011) Infants learn about objects from statistics and people. Developmental Psychology 47(5):1220–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, R., Nako, R., Band, J., Pizzuto, J., Shadravan, Y., Scerif, G. & Aslin, R. N. (2015) Rapid selection of non-native stimuli despite perceptual narrowing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27(11):2299–307.Google Scholar
Wu, R., Pruitt, Z., Runkle, M., Scerif, G. & Aslin, R. N. (2016) A neural signature of rapid category-based target selection as a function of intra-item perceptual similarity despite inter-item dissimilarity. Attention Perception and Psychophysics 78(3):749–76. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, R., Pruitt, Z., Zinszer, B. & Cheung, O. (2017) Increased experience amplifies the activation of task-irrelevant category representations. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 79(2):522–32.Google Scholar
Wu, R., Scerif, G., Aslin, R. N., Smith, T. J., Nako, R. & Eimer, M. (2013) Searching for something familiar or novel: Top-down attentional selection of specific items or object categories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 25(5):719–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, R. & Zhao, J. (2015) The persistence of attentional bias to regularities in a changing environment. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 77:2217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Al-Aidroos, N. & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2013) Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychological Science 24:667–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J. & Luo, Y. (2014) Statistical regularities alter the spatial scale of attention. Journal of Vision 14(10):11.Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Ngo, N., McKendrick, R. & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011) Mutual interference between statistical summary perception and statistical learning. Psychological Science 22:1212–19.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. & Yu, R. (2016) Statistical regularities reduce perceived numerosity. Cognition 146:217–22.Google Scholar