Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:54:31.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infants discriminate number: Evidence against the prerequisite of visual object individuation and the primacy of continuous magnitude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2017

Melissa E. Libertus ,
Emily J. Braham  and
Ruizhe Liu
Melissa E. Libertus
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology & Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA [email protected]@[email protected]://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/kitlab/
Emily J. Braham
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology & Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA [email protected]@[email protected]://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/kitlab/
Ruizhe Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology & Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA [email protected]@[email protected]://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/kitlab/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leibovich et al. hypothesize that the absence of visual object individuation limits infants' numerical skills and necessitates a reliance on continuous magnitudes. We argue that parallels between infants' numerical discrimination in the visual and auditory modalities, their abilities to match numerosities across modalities, and their greater ability to discriminate changes in number compared with continuous magnitudes contradict the authors' assumptions.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e176
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cordes, S. & Brannon, E. M. (2008) The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: Using number is just easier. Child Development 79(2):476–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01137.x.Google Scholar
DeCasper, A. J. & Fifer, W. P. (1980) Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science 208:1174–76.Google Scholar
Feigenson, L. (2011) Predicting sights from sounds: 6-month-olds' intermodal numerical abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 110(3):347–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepper, P. G. & Shahidullah, B. S. (1994) Development of fetal hearing. Archives of Disease in Childhood 71:F81–87.Google Scholar
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S. & Steri, A. (2009) Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(25):10382–85.Google Scholar
Jordan, K. E., Suanda, S. H. & Brannon, E. M. (2008b) Intersensory redundancy accelerates preverbal numerical competence. Cognition 108(1):210–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libertus, M. E., Starr, A. & Brannon, E. M. (2014) Number trumps area for 7-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology 50(1):108–12. doi: 10.1037/a0032986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipton, J. S. & Spelke, E. S. (2003) Origins of number sense large-number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science 14(5):396–401. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01453.Google Scholar
Starr, A. & Brannon, E. M. (2015) Evidence against continuous variables driving numerical discrimination in infancy. Frontiers in Psychology 6:923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. & Spelke, E. S. (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74(1):B1–11. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00066-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar