No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Holistic resource-rational analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2020
Abstract
We argue that Lieder and Griffiths’ method for analyzing rational process models cannot capture an important constraint on resource allocation, which is competition between different processes for shared resources (Klein 2018, Biology and Philosophy33:36). We suggest that holistic interactions between processes on at least three different timescales – episodic, developmental, and evolutionary – must be taken into account by a complete resource-bounded explanation.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020
References
Anderson, M. L. (2010) Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(4):245–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botvinick, M. & Braver, T. (2015) Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism. Annual Review of Psychology 66:83–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botvinick, M. M. & Cohen, J. D. (2014) The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: Charted territory and new frontiers. Cognitive Science 38(6):1249–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. L. (2013) What evolvability really is. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65(3):549–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcott, B. (2014) The creation and reuse of information in gene regulatory networks. Philosophy of Science 81(5):879–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K. & McClelland, J. L. (1990) On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 97(3):332–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D. W. & Abutalebi, J. (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(5):515–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, C. (2018) Mechanisms, resources, and background conditions. Biology and Philosophy 33:36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources
Related commentaries (25)
Another claim for cognitive history
Beginning with biology: “Aspects of cognition” exist in the service of the brain's overall function as a resource-regulator
Can resources save rationality? “Anti-Bayesian” updating in cognition and perception
Cognitively bounded rational analyses and the crucial role of theories of subjective utility
Computational limits don't fully explain human cognitive limitations
Generalization of the resource-rationality principle to neural control of goal-directed movements
Heuristics and the naturalistic fallacy
Holistic resource-rational analysis
Multiple conceptions of resource rationality
Opportunities and challenges integrating resource-rational analysis with developmental perspectives
Opportunities for emotion and mental health research in the resource-rationality framework
Optimal, resource-rational or sub-optimal? Insights from cognitive development
Representing utility and deploying the body
Resource-rational analysis versus resource-rational humans
Resource-rationality and dynamic coupling of brains and social environments
Resource-rationality as a normative standard of human rationality
Resource-rationality beyond individual minds: the case of interactive language use
Sampling as a resource-rational constraint
The biology of emotion is missing
The evolutionary foundations of resource-rational analysis
The importance of constraints on constraints
Towards a quantum-like cognitive architecture for decision-making
Uncovering cognitive constraints is the bottleneck in resource-rational analysis
What are the appropriate axioms of rationality for reasoning under uncertainty with resource-constrained systems?
What is the purpose of cognition?
Author response
Advancing rational analysis to the algorithmic level