Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:24:30.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heterosexism, homonegativity, and the sociopolitical dangers of orthodox models of prejudice reduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2012

Darren Langdridge
Darren Langdridge*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/staff/people-profile.php?name=Darren_Langdridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Criticism of orthodox models of prejudice reduction is particularly relevant for lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals, particularly when considering stage models of coming-out. If social change is to be effected regarding endemic homonegativity and heterosexism, then it is argued that a radical rethink is needed to the understandable but misinformed desire to get us to like each other more.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , December 2012 , pp. 440
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badgett, M. V. L., Donnelly, C. & Kibbe, J. (1992) Pervasive patterns of discrimination against lesbians and gay men: Evidence from surveys across the United States. National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Cass, V. (1979) Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality 4:210–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cass, V. (1984) Homosexual identity formation: Testing a theoretical model. The Journal of Sex Research 20:143–67.Google Scholar
Coleman, E. (1981/1982) Developmental stages of the coming out process. Journal of Homosexuality 7:43.Google Scholar
Halpin, S. A. & Allen, M. W. (2004) Changes in psychosocial well-being during stages of gay identity development. Journal of Homosexuality 47:109–26.Google Scholar
Horowitz, J. L. & Newcomb, M. D. (2001) A multidimensional approach to homosexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality 42:1–19.Google Scholar
Langdridge, D. (2008) Are you angry or are you heterosexual? A queer critique of lesbian and gay models of identity development. In: Feeling queer or queer feelings: Radical approaches to counselling sex, sexualities and gender, ed. Moon, L., pp. 23–35. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. B. (2011) The friends and family plan: Contact with gays and support for gay rights. The Policy Studies Journal 39:217–38.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90:751–83.Google Scholar
Secord, P. F. & Backman, C. W. (1961) Personality change and the problem of stability and change in individual behavior: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review 68:21–32.Google Scholar
Smith, A. M. (1994) New right discourse on race and sexuality: Britain 1968–1990. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilcsik, A. (2011) Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 117:586–626.Google Scholar
Woodman, N. J. & Lena, H. R. (1980) Counseling with gay men and women: A guide for facilitating positive lifestyles. Jossey Bass.Google Scholar