Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:23:40.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Freud to acetylcholine: Does the AAOM suffice to construct a dream?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2013

Helene Sophrin Porte
Helene Sophrin Porte*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Toward illuminating the structure of Llewellyn's dream theory, I compare it in formal terms to Freud's dream theory. An alternative to both of these dream machines, grounded in the distribution of cholinergic activation in the central nervous system, is presented. It is suggested that neither “high” nor “low” dream theory is sufficient to account for the properties of dreams.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 626 - 628
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Botly, L. C. P. & De Rosa, E. (2012) Impaired visual search in rats reveals cholinergic contributions to feature binding in visuospatial attention. Cerebral Cortex 22:2441–53.Google Scholar
Brudzynski, S. M., Iku, A. & Harness, A. (2011) Activity of cholinergic neurons in the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus during emission of 22kHz vocalization in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 225:276–83.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1900/1953/1981) The interpretation of dreams. In: The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vols. 4 and 5, ed. and trans. Strachey, J.. Hogarth Press/The Institute of Psychoanalysis. (Original work published in 1900; Hogarth Press Complete Works edition, 1953; Institute of Psychoanalysis reprint, 1981).Google Scholar
Jacobs, L. F. (2012) From chemotaxis to the cognitive map: The function of olfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:10693–700.Google Scholar
MacDonald, C. J., Lepage, K. Q., Eden, U. T. & Eichenbaum, H. (2011) Memory for time? Hippocampal “time cells” bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events. Neuron 71:737–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprenger, A., Lappe-Osthege, M., Talamo, S., Gais, S., Kimmig, H. & Helmchen, C. (2010) Eye movements during REM sleep and imagination of visual scenes. NeuroReport 21:45–49.Google Scholar
Stephenson-Jones, M., Floros, O., Robertson, B. & Grillner, S. (2012) Evolutionary conservation of the habenular nuclei and their circuitry controlling the dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109:E165–73.Google Scholar
Wainer, B. H. & Mesulam, M.-M. (1990) Ascending cholinergic pathways in the rat brain. In: Brain cholinergic systems, ed. Steriade, M. & Biesold, D., pp. 65–119. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar