Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:39:10.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Defeaters” don't matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Zina B. Ward  and
Edouard Machery
Zina B. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA [email protected]://zinabward.com
Edouard Machery
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science and the Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that the exercise of agency is compatible with the presence of what Doris calls “defeaters.” In order to undermine reflectivist theories of agency and support his valuational alternative, Doris must not simply show that defeaters exist but rather establish that some agentive behaviors do express a person's values without involving reflection.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957) Intention. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arpaly, N. & Schroeder, T. (2012) Deliberation and acting for reasons. Philosophical Review 121(2):209–39.Google Scholar
Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C. & Egloff, B. (2009) Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97(3):533.Google Scholar
Bushman, B. J., DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S. & Hanus, M. D. (2014) Low glucose relates to greater aggression in married couples. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(17):6254–57.Google Scholar
Cherlin, A. J., Furstenberg, F. F., Chase-Lansdale, L., Kiernan, K. E., Robins, P. K., Morrison, D. R. & Teitler, J. O. (1991) Longitudinal studies of effects of divorce on children in Great Britain and the United States. Science 252(5011):1386–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doris, J. M. (2015b). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, M. P. (1985) Mood states and consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research 12(3):281–300.Google Scholar
Hogarth, R. M. & Einhorn, H. J. (1992) Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology 24(1):1–55.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Miller, J. M. & Tichy, M. P. (2004) An unrecognized need for ballot reform: Effects of candidate name order. In: Rethinking the vote: The politics and prospects of American election reform, ed. Crigler, A. N., Just, M. R. & McCaffery, E. J., pp. 51–74. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I. & Norenzayan, A. (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108(2):291–310. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.108.2.291.Google Scholar
Northover, S. B., Pedersen, W. C., Cohen, A. B. & Andrews, P. W. (2017) Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: Two meta-analyses. Evolution and Human Behavior 38(1):144–53.Google Scholar
Railton, P. (2006) How to engage reason: The problem of regress. In: Reason and value: Themes from the moral philosophy of Joseph Raz, ed. Wallace, R. J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S. & Smith, M., pp. 176–201. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Railton, P. (2009) Practical competence and fluent agency. In: Reasons for action, ed. Sobel, D. & Wall, S., pp. 81–115. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1999) Engaging reason: On the theory of value and action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, W. (2014) Attention. Routledge.Google Scholar