Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:56:20.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Distribution of the Surplus Prior and at Ruin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Hanspeter Schmidli
Hanspeter Schmidli*
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Statistics, Aarhus University
*
Department of Theoretical Statistics, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consider a classical compound Poisson model. The safety loading can be positive, negative or zero. Explicit expressions for the distributions of the surplus prior and at ruin are given in terms of the ruin probability. Moreover, the asymptotic behaviour of these distributions as the initial capital tends to infinity are obtained. In particular, for positive safety loading the Cramer case, the case of subexponential distributions and some intermediate cases are discussed.

Keywords

Ruinasymptotic distributionchange of measureLaplace transformsubexponential distributionCramer conditiongeneralized Pareto distributionmaximum domain of attractionGumbel distribution
Type
Articles
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , November 1999 , pp. 227 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1999

References

Asmussen, S. (1982) Conditioned limit theorems relating a random walk to its associate, with applications to risk reserve processes and the GI/G/1 Queue. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 14, 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmussen, S. & Kluppelberg, C. (1996) Large deviations results for subexponential tails, with applications to insurance risk. Stochastic Process. Appl. 64, 64–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkema, A.A. & De Haan, L. (1974) Residual life-time at great age. Ann. Probab. 2, 2–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramér, H. (1930) On the mathematical Theory of Risk. Skandia Jubilee Volume, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Dickson, D.C.M. (1992) On the distribution of the surplus prior to ruin. Insurance Math. Econom. 11, 11–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, D.C.M., Dos Reis, A.D.E. & Waters, H.R. (1995) Some stable algorithms in ruin theory and their applications. ASTIN Bull. 25, 25–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufresne, F. & Gerber, H.L.J. (1988) The surpluses immediately before and at ruin, and the amount of the claim causing ruin. Insurance Math. Econom. 7, 7–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufresne, F. & Gerber, H.U. (1989) Three methods to calculate the probability of ruin. ASTIN Bull. 19, 19–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrechts, P. & Goldie, C.M. (1982) On convolution tails. Stochastic Process. Appl. 13, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrechts, P., Grandell, J. & Schmidli, H. (1993) Finite-time Lundberg inequalities in the Cox case. Scand. Actuarial J., 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C. & Mikosch, T. (1997) Modelling Extremal Events. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrechts, P. & Veraverbeke, N. (1982) Estimates for the probability of ruin with special emphasis on the possibility of large claims. Insurance Math. Econom. 1, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. (1971) An introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. Volume II, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1973) Martingales in risk theory. Schweiz. Verein. Versicherungsmath. Mitt. 73, 205–216.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. (1979) An introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory. Huebner Foundation Monographs, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U., Goovaerts, M.J. & Kaas, R. (1987) On the probability and severity of ruin. ASTIN Bull. 17, 17–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, C.M. & Resnick, S. (1988) Distributions that are both subexponential and in the domain of attraction of an extreme-value distribution. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 20, 20–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandell, J. (1991) Aspects of Risk Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, F. (1903) I. Approximerad Framstältning av Sannolikhetsfunktionen. II. Återförsäkering av Kollektivrisker. Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Panjer, H.H. (1981) Recursive evaluation of a family of compound distributions. ASTIN Bull. 12, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolski, T., Schmidli, H., Schmidt, V. & Teugels, J.L. (1999) Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance. Wiley, Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidli, H. (1995) Cramer-Lundberg approximations for ruin probabilities of risk processes perturbed by diffusion. Insurance Math. Econom. 16, 16–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmot, G.E. & Lin, X.S. (1998) Exact and approximate properties of the distribution of surplus before and after ruin. Insurance Math. Econom. 23, 23–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar