Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-mgq6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-07T21:13:08.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Race and Empire in Meiji Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Abstract

The Meiji era (1868–1912) marks the initial process of Japan's passage into modernity through Westernization, and its identification as a modern nation-state. As part of the process of identifying with European discourses, of altering its position in Asia, and of adopting Western models and values, Japan changed its political, social and cultural dispositions towards industrialization and capitalism, as well as towards nationalism and colonialism, cultural and artistic creation.

Over the course of modernization, and of adapting various Western discourses on science and culture, Japan accepted several new approaches, especially those setting Europe apart and above from the rest of the world. As a result, Japan saw the rise of racial discourses, which eventually contributed to the state's imperial expansion into Asia.

Japan's path to modernity was a twofold movement: on one hand, it was an internal struggle for association with Western civilizations and adoption of their modernity. On the other hand, Japan sought to conceptually distance itself from Asia, only to return a few decades later as a conquering and imperial power. In the Japanese imagination, European cultures served as a perfect model for its own reformation, yet, at the same time, Japan found itself on a pendulum movement between Europe and Asia. Japan distanced itself from what it perceived as a primitive, underdeveloped region and its cultures, while simultaneously seeking to include China and India in its vision of a unified Orient, a stronghold of Asian cultures positioned against the Occident. Ultimately, Japan's self-definition came about through the notion of Otherness: the concept of “Japan” was defined primarily against the background of European civilization, but also, against a range of other cultures, including China and the United States, as well as its own immediate past of Tokugawa Japan.

In the first stage, the primary task was to set Japanese culture apart, and essentialize “Asia” as its Other. The desire to associate Japan with the West then led to a sense of Japan's “inferiority” (especially in terms of technological and scientific achievements), at the same time that Japanese leaders adopted a Western position in claiming “superiority” over Asia. The double movement of association (with Europe) and disassociation (from Asia) produced a new subtext to the binary opposition between the advanced and sophisticated, versus the primitive and simple-minded. This double movement, much like the binary logic that drove Western colonialism, laid the foundations for racial ideologies and imperial practices in Hokkaidō and Ryūkyū, Korea and Taiwan, Manchuria and China, as well as the South-Pacific Islands and Southeast Asia.

The articles in this issue look at the roots of the discourses on race in the Meiji era, in tandem with the Japanese empire's development in the latter part of the 19th Century. These concepts of race and empire lay at the center of Japan's racist ideologies and imperialist fantasies, and now serve as the focus of our discussions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Books

Barclay, Paul D., Outcasts of Empire: Japan's Rule on Taiwan's “Savage Border,” 1874–1945 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Barkan, Elazar, The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, Hilary and Patterson, Wayne, ed. Japan in Transition: Thought and Action in the Meiji Era, 1868-1912 (London: Fairleigh Dickson University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Gluck, Carol, Japan's Modern Myths: Ideology in the Late Meiji Period (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Marius, The Making of Modern Japan (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Michele, Dominant Narratives of Colonial Hokkaido and Imperial Japan Envisioning the Periphery and the Modern Nation-State (London & New York: Palgrave-MacMillan, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeshirō, Matsuura (松浦武四郎). Ezo nisshi (蝦夷日誌) (Tokyo: Jiji Tsūshinsha, 1962); Takakura Shinichirō (高倉新一郎), Takeshirō kaiho nikki (武四郎廻浦日記) (Sapporo: Hokkaidō Shuppan Kikaku Sentā, 1978);.Google Scholar
Takeshirō, Matsuura (松浦武四郎). Matsuura Takeshirō zenshū (松浦武四郎選集) [Complete works of Matsuura Takeshirō] (Sapporo: Hokkaidō Shuppan Kikaku Sentā, 1996–2008).Google Scholar
Neiberg, Michael S., The Treaty of Versailles: A Concise History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Kakuzō, Okakura (岡倉覚三), The Book of Tea (茶の本) [Cha no Hon] (New York: Duffield & Company, 1906).Google Scholar
Kakuzō, Okakura (岡倉覚三), The Ideals of the East with Special Reference to the Art of Japan (London: John Murray, 1920).Google Scholar
Tanaka, Stefan, Japan's Orient: Rendering Pasts into History (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, Robert Thomas, Tropics of Savagery: The Culture of Japanese Empire in Comparative Frame (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Michael, ed., Japan's Minorities: The Illusion of Homogeneity (London: Routledge, 1997); Barbara Poisson Aoki, The Ainu of Japan (Minneapolis, MI: Lerner Publications, 2002).Google Scholar
Wesseling, Henk L., European colonial empires 1815-1919 (London and New York: Routledge, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesseling, Henk L., Imperialism and Colonialism: Essays on the History of European Expansion (Westport, CT and London: Greenwood, 1997).Google Scholar
Takejō, Yoshida (吉田武三), Zōho Matsuura Takeshirō (増補松浦武四郎) (Tokyo: Matsuura Takeshirō Den Kankōkai, 1966).Google Scholar
Takejō, Yoshida (吉田武三). Sankō Ezo nisshi (三航蝦夷日誌) (Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1970).Google Scholar
Adas, Michael, “Imperialism and Colonialism in Comparative Perspective,” The International History Review, vol. 20, No. 2 (1998):371388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, Robert, “Of Civilization and Savages: The Mimetic Imperialism of Japan's 1874 Expedition to Taiwan,” American Historical Review vol. 107, no. 2 (2002):388418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukichi, Fukuzawa (福澤諭吉) Bunmeiron no Gairyaku (文明論之概略) [An Outline of a Theory of Civilization] (1875),Google Scholar
Yukichi, Fukuzawa (福澤諭吉). “Datsu-A ron,” Fukuzawa Yukichi zenshū, dai 10 kan (Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1970 [1885]):238240.Google Scholar
Kōjin, Karatani, “Japan as Art Museum: Okakura Tenshin and Fenollosa,” in A History of Modern Japanese Aesthetics, ed. and trans. Marra, Michael, 4352 (Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michio, Nakajima, “Shinto Deities That Crossed the Sea: Japan's ‘Overseas Shrines,‘ 1868 to 1945,” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies vol. 37, no. 1 (2010):2146.Google Scholar
Korhonen, Pekka, “Leaving Asia? The Meaning of Datsu-A and Japan's Modern History,” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, vol. 11, Issue 50, No. 1, March 3, 2014. Article 4083Google Scholar
Morris Law, “Physical Anthropology in Japan the Ainu and the Search for the Origins of the Japanese,” Current Anthropology vol. 53, Supplement 5 (April 2012): S57S68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris-Suzuki, Tessa, “Race,” in: Re-inventing Japan: Time, Space, Nation (New York: Sharpe, 1998).Google Scholar
Rumi, Sakamoto, “Japan, Hybridity and the Creation of Colonialist Discourse,” Theory, Culture & Society vol. 13, no. 3 (August 1996):113–28.Google Scholar
Kōji, Suga, “A Concept of ‘Overseas Shinto Shrines’: A Pantheistic Attempt by Ogasawara Shōzō and Its Limitations,” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies vol. 37, no. 1 (2010):4774.Google Scholar
Hideaki, Uemura, “The colonial annexation of Okinawa and the logic on international law: the formation of an ‘indigenous people’ in East AsiaJapanese Studies vol. 23, no. 2 (Winter 2003):213222.Google Scholar
Kezen, Uehara (上原兼善). “Shimazu Clan Raid of the Ryūkyū: Another Invasion (of Korea 1597-8)” (「島津氏の琉球侵略 : もう一つの慶長の役」) Ryūkyū Arc Series No. 19 (April 2009) 『琉球弧叢書;19))』2009年4月。.Google Scholar