Article contents
Object literacy at University College London Library Services
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2017
Abstract
University College London (UCL) Library Services holds extensive Special Collections that are employed in various teaching and public engagement activities. Students and academic staff at the UCL Slade School of Fine Art have the opportunity to participate in the Slade Small Press Project that uses the UCL Small Press Collections as inspiration, recognising the current trend for printed material and text as a visual medium. UCL's BASc students, and participants at library public events focused on non-creative subjects, study ways in which the physical aspects of rare books contribute to understanding the text, with surprisingly creative outputs. While museums have recently adopted Object Based Learning (OBL) as a teaching strategy, this form of learning has long been familiar in libraries, particularly for special collections. However as readers increasingly access library text digitally, and perceive text as unaffected by medium, they are losing the skills to interpret physical books and printed material (skills we term ‘object literacy’), making OBL approaches more important than ever for library staff. In keeping with the UCL 2034 strategy, the Connected Curriculum encourages participation in research at all levels of study and OBL methods enable interdisciplinary enquiry and collaborative practices.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Art Libraries Journal , Volume 42 , Special Issue 2: Information Literacy in UK and US Art Libraries , April 2017 , pp. 99 - 106
- Copyright
- Copyright © ARLIS/UK&Ireland 2017
References
1. “Connected Curriculum”. University College London. 2016. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/teaching-learning/education-initiatives/connected-curriculum (accessed January 12, 2017).
2. Tenderbooks. http://tenderbooks.co.uk/ (accessed January 12, 2017).
3. “object, n.”. OED Online. December 2016. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/129613 (accessed January 11, 2017).
4. Twain, Mark. The prince and the pauper. 1881. London: Chatto & Windus Google Scholar. xii. 115.
5. Good, Carter Victor. Dictionary of education. 1945. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 411/2Google Scholar.
6. de Tocqueville, Alexis. American institutions and their influence. Transl. Reeve, Henry. 1851. New York: A.S. Barnes & Co. 16Google Scholar.
7. For an overview of recent work across the fields mentioned in this paragraph, see Chatterjee, Helen, Hannan, Leonie and Thomson, Linda, ‘An introduction to object-based learning and multisensory engagement’ in Chatterjee, Helen and Hannan, Leonie, Eds. Engaging the senses: object-based learning in Higher Education. 2015. Farnham: Ashgate. 1–14 Google Scholar.
8. For a range of approaches, see Chatterjee, Helen, Ed. Touch in museums: policy and practice in object handling. 2008. Oxford and New York: Berg Google Scholar.
9. See, for example, Woodall, Alexandra, ‘Rummaging as a strategy for creative thinking and imaginative engagement in Higher Education’ in Chatterjee, Helen and Hannan, Leonie, Eds. Engaging the senses: object-based learning in Higher Education. 2015. Farnham: Ashgate. 133–155 Google Scholar.
10. See, for example, Boivin, Nicole. Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society and evolution. 2008. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar.
11. For an account of the history of these boards, known as the ‘Bilderatlas’, and for photographs of what survives of them, see Cornell University Library and The Warburg Institute. Mnemosyne: meanderings through Aby Warburg's atlas. 2013–2016. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. https://warburg.library.cornell.edu/about/mnemosyne-themes (accessed 11 January, 2017).
12. Clark, Thomas A.. A small subtraction from the River Add. 2011. Pittenweem, Fife: Moschatel Press Google Scholar. UCL Special Collections POETRY STORE [X] MOS:CLA
- 2
- Cited by