Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:36:28.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXII.—Some Historical Aspects of the English Law of Attainder and Forfeiture for High Treason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2012

Get access

Extract

A knowledge of the working of the English Law of Attainder and Forfeiture for High Treason is essential to a proper understanding of the History of England in the Middle Ages, especially during the period of the Wars of the Roses.

Perhaps the working of the law can be shown best in individual cases. Let us select as examples the fortunes of the dignities and estates which but for forfeiture and other intervening circumstances would have centred in the ill-fated Edward Earl of Warwick, last male scion of the splendid House of Plantagenet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1883

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 409 note a The narrative will probably be made more clear by reference to the Genealogical Table at the end of this Paper.

page 410 note a Rymer, , Fwdera, orig. ed. vol. viii. pp. 89 and 107Google Scholar.

page 410 note b Bentley's Excerpta Historica, p. 1.

page 410 note c Shakespeare's King Henry VI. part I, act i. s. 4.

page 411 note a See the comments on the Lords Report on the Dignity of a Peer, in Courthope's edition of Nicolas’

page 413 note a 26 Henry VIII. c. 13, 33 Henry VIII. c. 20.

page 413 note b The decision by virtue of which James second Duke of Atholl was succeeded on his death in 1704 by his nephew John, son of the attainted but then deceased Lord George Murray, seems to me conclusive on the point. The English law of forfeiture for high treason applied then to Scottish dignities and estates.

page 414 note a Carte's, History of England, vol. ii. p. 776Google Scholar.

page 415 note a Stat. 34 Edward III. c. 12.

page 416 note a Let. & Pap. Henry VIII. vol. i. doc. 180.

page 416 note b See Common Pleas, Feet of Fines, York, ca. 13, 9 Henry IV. No. 8.; Rot. Parl. vi. 124 b. and 391 b.

page 416 note c Hall's Chronicle, ed. 1809, p. 296.

page 418 note a Act of Exchange, Rot. Part. vi. 125 bGoogle Scholar.

page 418 note b Rot. Part. vi. 191a.

page 419 note a Rot. Parl. vi. 193-5.

page 420 note a Rous Roll, par. 60.

page 422 note a Rot. Parl. vi. 391b.

page 422 note b Stat. 11 Henry VII. c. 29.

page 423 note a Or with that of the succession of John, son of the attainted Lord George Murray, to the Dukedom of Athol.

page 423 note b 19 Henry VII. c. 34.

page 423 note c Rot. Pad. 1513-1553, suppl. vol. xlix. b.

page 424 note a 31 Henry VIII. c. 15.

page 427 note a Law Rep. 7 E. & I. H. L. Ap. Ca. p. 305.