No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
EARLY IBĀḌĪ THEOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS ON ATOMS AND ACCIDENTS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2013
Abstract
The bulk of Orientalist research regarding Islamic theological literature has neglected Ibāḍī theological opinions related to cosmology, which has led to an incomplete understanding of Islamic theology in the West and to a significant gap in Western scholarship. The omission of this important movement of Islam is understandable, considering the unavailability, lack of publication, circulation and translation of Ibāḍī texts. Therefore, this study seeks to address some of these gaps in the scholarship on early Islamic theology. The goals of this article are: 1) to characterize the classical Ibāḍī theological literature dealing with the atomistic theory of substance and accident; 2) to review the texts of Ibāḍī scholars as they argued and engaged with other Islamic theological schools: pre-Bahshamiyya Muʿtazilites (Abū Hāshim al-Jubbāʾī, d. 321/933) and Ashʿarites (Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī, d. 324/936), in relation to the atomistic theory of substance and accident during the 3rd/9th century; 3) to survey the wide range of opinions among the early Ibāḍī theologians, and to examine the specific sources and themes that may have influenced this multifarious school of thought. Likewise, it is the aim of this article to demonstrate the common features in the Ibāḍī approach to producing theological literature during the formation of Islamic theology, and to explore how these early theologians may have gained access to cosmological themes that predate Islam.
Résumé
Le gros de la recherche orientaliste consacrée à la littérature théologique islamique a négligé les idées théologiques Ibāḍī à portée cosmologique, ce qui a conduit à une compréhension incomplète de la théologie islamique et à un manque considérable dans la recherche occidentale. L'omission de ce mouvement important de l'Islam est compréhensible étant donné que les textes Ibāḍī ne sont accessibles, publiés, diffusés et traduits que de façon très partielle. Cette étude vise donc à combler certaines de ces lacunes dans la recherche sur la première théologie islamique. Les objectifs de cet article sont de: 1) caractériser la littérature Ibāḍī classique portant sur la théorie atomiste de la substance et de l'accident; 2) examiner les textes d'auteurs Ibāḍī du iiie/ixe siècle dialoguant et discutant avec d'autres écoles théologiques islamiques, à savoir les Muʿtazilites pré-Bahshamiyya (Abū Hāshim al-Jubbāʾī, d. 321/933) et les Ashʿarites (Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī, d. 324/936), en lien avec la théorie atomiste de la substance et de l'accident; 3) passer en revue le grand nombre d'opinions soutenues parmi les premiers théologiens Ibāḍī, et examiner les sources et les thèmes spécifiques susceptibles d'avoir influencé cette école de pensée diversifiée. Cet article cherche aussi à identifier des traits communs dans l'approche Ibāḍī durant la période de formation de la théologie islamique, et à explorer les voies grâce auxquelles ces premiers théologiens ont pu avoir accès à des thèmes cosmologiques antérieurs à l'Islam.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
1 Early Ibāḍī Literature: Abū l-Mundhir Bashīr b. Muḥammad b. Maḥbūb, introduced and edited by al-Salimi, Abdulrahman and Madelung, Wilferd (Wiesbaden, 2011)Google Scholar.
2 Crone, Patricia and Zimmermann, Fritz, The Epistle of Sālim b. Dhakwān (Oxford, 2001), p. 318Google Scholar; Wilkinson, John, The Imamate Tradition of Oman (Cambridge, 1987), pp. 190–1Google Scholar.
3 See “Abu l-Hudhayl al-ʿAllaf”, EI 2.
4 Pines, Salomon, Beiträge Zur Islamischen Atomenlehre (Berlin, 1936), p. 5–7Google Scholar; Wolfson, Harry Austryn, The Philosophy of the Kalam (Cambridge, MA and London, 1976), pp. 466–86Google Scholar; Frank, Richard, The Metaphysics of Created Being according to Abu l-Hudhayl al-ʿAllaf: a Philosophical Study of the Earliest Kalām (Istanbul, 1966), pp. 1–53Google Scholar.
5 Wolfson, The Philosophy of the Kalam, pp. 521–44; Frank, Richard, “Al-Ašʿarī's conception of the nature and role of speculation reasoning in theology”, Proceeding of the VIth Congress of Arabic and Islamic Studies (Stockholm, 1972), pp. 136–54Google Scholar.
6 Rashed, Roshdi, Œuvres philosophiques et scientifiques d'al-Kindī. Volume I: L'optique et la catoptrique (Leiden, 1997), pp. 25–36Google Scholar.
7 Cf. on the works that deal with the Ibāḍī-Muʿtazilite theological encounters: van Ess, Josef, Une lecture à rebours de l'histoire du muʿtazilisme, Revue des Études Islamiques, hors série 14 (Paris, 1984): 106–10Google Scholar; Moreno, M. Martino, “Note di teologia ibâdita”, Annali del Istituto Universitario di Studi Orientali di Napoli, N.S., 3 (1949): 299–313Google Scholar; Nallino, Carl A., “Sull'origine del nome dei Muʿtaziliti”, Rivista degli Studi Orientali, 7 (1916–1918): 429–54Google Scholar; Nallino, Carl A., “Rapporti fra la dogmatica muʿtazilita e quella degli Ibâditi dell'Africa settentrionale”, Rivista degli Studi Orientali, 7 (1916–18): 455–60Google Scholar; Watt, William Montgomery, “Was Wāsil a Khārijite?”, in Gramlich, Richard (ed.), Islam wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Fritz Meier zum 60. Geburtstag (Wiesbaden, 1974), pp. 306–11Google Scholar; Crone, Patricia, “A statement by the Najdiyya Khārijites on the dispensability of the Imamate”, Studia Islamica, 88 (1998): 55–76Google Scholar; Madelung, Wilferd, “ʿAbd Allah Ibn Ibāḍ and the origins of the Ibāḍīyya”, in Michalak-Pikulska, Barbara and Pikulski, Andrzej (eds.), Authority, Privacy and Public Order in Islam, Proceeding of the 22nd Congress of L'Union Européenne des Arabisants et Islamisants (Paris, 2006), pp. 51–8Google Scholar.
8 Nūr al-Dīn ‘Abd Allāh b. Ḥumayd al-Sālimī, Tuḥfat al-Aʿyān bi-sīrat ahl ʿUmān, ed. Abū Isḥāq Aṭfayyish, 2 vols. (Cairo, 1961), vol. 1, pp. 132–3Google Scholar; Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Kindī, Bayān al-Sharʿ (Muscat, 1987), vol. 1, pp. 152–4; 183–5Google Scholar.
9 Abū Muḥammad ʿAbd Allāh Ibn Baraka, al-Taqyīd (a manuscript is kept at al-Sālimī Library in Bidiya, Oman), p. 22; F. al-Jaʾbīrī, al-Buʿd al-ḥaḍārī li-al-ʿaqīda al-Ibāḍiyya (Muscat, 1987), p. 350Google Scholar.
10 Crone & Zimmermann, The Epistle of Sālim b. Dhakwān, pp. 305–15; also EI 2, s.v. Mabḥūb b. al-Ruḥayl.
11 Jumayyil b. Khamīs al-Saʿdī, Qāmūs al-Sharīʿa (Muscat, 1985), vol. 8, pp. 303–4Google Scholar; Sirḥān b. Saʿīd al-Azkawī, Kashf al-Ghuma, ed. by Ḥasan al-Nabūdha (Beirut, 2006), vol. 2, p. 1005Google Scholar.
12 Abū al-ʿAbbās Aḥmad b. Saʿīd Darjīnī, Ṭabaqāt al-Mashāʾikh, ed. Ṭalāyī, Ibrāhīm (Algeria, 1987), vol. 2, p. 278Google Scholar; Sallām, Ibn, Kitāb fīhi badʾ al-Islām wa-sharāʾiʿ al-dīn, ed. Sālim b.Yaʿqūb and Schwartz, T. (Wiesbaden, 1986), p. 130Google Scholar.
13 Ibn Baraka, Taqyīd, p. 59.
14 Sitta, Abū, Ḥāshīyat al-Tartīb (Muscat, 1987), vol. 1, p. 143Google Scholar.
15 Salama b. Muslim al-ʿAwtabī, al-Ansāb (Muscat, 1984), vol. 2, p. 229Google Scholar.
16 Sayf b. Hamūd al-Battāshī, Itḥāf al-Aʿyān (Muscat, 2008), vol. 2, p. 250Google Scholar.
17 Ibn Baraka, al-Taqyīd, p. 159; see also Crone & Zimmermann, The Epistle of Sālim b. Dhakwān, pp. 314–15.
18 Wilkinson, The Imamate Tradition of Oman, pp. 2–3.
19 Van Ess, J., Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra: eine Geschichte des religiösen Denkens im frühen Islam, 6 vols. (Berlin and New York, 1991–97), vol. 1, pp. 406–14Google Scholar. Recently, theological texts have been discovered in Algeria in al-ʿAlī library in Mazab among which the Kitāb al-Tawḥīd by ʿAbd Allah b. Yazīd al-Fazārī mentions the concepts of atoms and accident. The text was written approximately in the 170s.
20 Crone and Zimmermann, The Epistle of Sālim b. Dhakwān, pp. 309–14; Wilkinson, John, Al-Ibāḍism: Origin and Early Development in Oman (Oxford, 2010), p. 237Google Scholar.
21 Cf. Crone & Zimmermann, The Epistle of Salim b. Dhakwān, p. 277; al-Salimi, Abdulrahman, “Themes of Omani/Ibāḍī Siyar”, Journal of Semitic Studies, v. 54 (2009): 475–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Al-Sālimī, Tuḥfa, vol. 1, p. 122; Wilkinson, The Imamate Tradition of Oman, pp. 164–5.
23 Madelung, Wilferd, Streitschrift des Zaiditenimams Aḥmad an-Nāṣir wider die Ibāḍitische Prädestinationslehre (Wiesbaden, 1985)Google Scholar.
24 Al-Siyar wa-al-Jawbāt, ed. Sayyida Kāshif Ismāʾīl (Muscat, 1984)Google Scholar.
25 See the three texts: al-Siyar wa-al-Jawbāt, vol. 1, pp. 295–318.
26 Al-Sālimī, Tuḥfa, vol. 1, p. 155.
27 “Ibāḍiyah”, EI 2.
28 Wilkinson, John C., “The early development of the Ibāḍī movement in Basra”, in Juynboll, G. H. A. (ed.), Studies on the First century of Islamic Society (Carbondale, 1982)Google Scholar; Crone & Zimmermann, The Epistle of Sālim b. Dhakwān, p. 306–8; Van Ess, Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra, vol. 1, p. 411.
29 “Abu al-Mūʾthir”, EI 2.
30 Cf. al-Salimi, Abdulrahman, “Identifying Omani/Ibāḍī Siyar”, Journal of Semitic Studies, 55 (1) (2010): 115–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; This epistle is still in manuscript form, but is available in several private libraries in Oman such as al-Sālimī and al-Būsaʾīdī.
31 For Ibn Barka see further details in EI 2: Ibn Barka. According to Kitāb al-Taqyīd of which a manuscript is preserved in al-Sālimī's Library.
32 Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī b. Muḥammad al-Basyawī, al-Jāmiʿ (Muscat, 1984)Google Scholar.
33 Cf. al-Salimi, “Identifying Omani/Ibāḍī Siyar”; al-Siyar wa-al-Jawabāt, ed. Isma'īl Kāshif.
34 For Nizwā and Rustāq schools see further; Wilkinson, The Imamate Tradition in Oman, pp. 210, 346.
35 Salāma b. Muslim al-ʿAwtabī, al-Diyāʾ (Muscat, 1984), vol. 3, pp. 96–110Google Scholar.
36 Ibid.
37 Nūr al-Dīn ʿAbd Allāh b. Ḥumayd al-Sālimī, Rawḍ al-Bayān fī al-radd ʿalā man iddaʿā qidam al-Qurʾān, ed. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Sālimī (Muscat, 1994)Google Scholar.
38 Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyā b. Zakariyyā, al-Iḍāḥ fī al-aḥkām (Muscat, 1983), vol. 4, p. 321Google Scholar.
39 Musā b. Nijād, Kitāb al-Akilla wa-ḥaqāʾiq al-adilla, a manuscript in al-Sālimī library in Bidiya, Oman.
40 Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. ʿAbd Allāh b. Mūsā al-Kindī, al-Muṣannaf (Muscat, 1982–1988)Google Scholar.
41 Abū Bakr Aḥmad b. ʿAbd Allāh b. Mūsā al-Kindī, al-Jawhar al-Muqtaṣar (Muscat, 1984)Google Scholar.
42 Abū Saʿīd Muḥammad b. Saʿīd al-Qalhātī, al-Kashf wa-al-Bayān ed. Sayyida Ismāʾīl Kashīf (Muscat, 1984)Google Scholar.
43 Abū Zakariyā Yaḥyā b. Abī al-Khayr al-Jinnāwnī, al-Waḍʿ ed. Abū Isḥāq Aṭfayyish (Muscat, 1978)Google Scholar.
44 Abū ʿAmmār ʿAbd al-Kāfī al-Warjilānī, al-Mūjaz (Arāʾ al-Khawārij al-Kalāmiyya al-Mūjaz li-Abī ʿAmmār ʿAbd al-Kāfi al-Ibāḍī) ed. ʿAmmār al-Ṭālibī, 2 vols (Algiers, 1978)Google Scholar.
45 Abū Yaʿqūb Yūsuf b. Ibrāhīm al-Warjilānī, al-Dalīl wa-al-Burhān, 3 parts in 2 vols (Muscat, 1997)Google Scholar.
46 Abū Ṭāhir Ismāʾīl b. Mūsā al-Jītālī, Qawāʿid al-Islām, ed. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Biklī (Muscat, 2001)Google Scholar.
47 Farḥāt al-Jaʾbīrī, al-Buʿd al-ḥaḍārī li-al-ʿaqīda al-Ibāḍiya (Muscat, 1987), p. 150Google Scholar.
48 Al-Ja'bīrī, al-Buʿd al-ḥaḍārī, p. 351.
49 Rukn al-Dīn Maḥmūd ibn al-Malāḥimī al-Khwārazmī, al-Fāʾiq fī Uṣūl al-Dīn, ed. Madelung, Wilferd and MacDermott, Martin (Tehran, 2006), p. 11Google Scholar; Frank, The Metaphysics of Created Being according to Abū l-Hudhayl al-ʿAllāf, pp. 1–53.
50 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 3.
51 Al-Nīsābūrī, Masāʾil al-Khilāf, p. 37.
52 Al-Jaʾbīrī, al-Buʿd.
53 ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Baghdādī, al-Farq bayn al-firaq, ed. Badr, M. (Cairo, 1910), p. 164Google Scholar; Muḥammad Ibn Ḥazm, K. al-Faṣl fī al-milal wa-al-ahwāʾ wa-al-niḥal (Cairo, 1947), vol. 4, p. 202, 7Google Scholar.
54 Wolfson, The Philosophy of the Kalam, p. 366.
55 Bashīr, Raṣf, p. 5.
56 Bashīr, Muḥaraba, part 2.
57 Ibid.
58 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 43. This approval is mentioned in a correspondence between the Judge Abū Zakariyyā and the Imām al-Khalīl b. Shādhān (r. c. 450/1058-475/1082) in Oman.
59 Abū Rashīd al-Nīsābūrī, Masāʾil al-Khilāf bayn al-Baṣriyyīn wa-al-Baghdādiyyīn, ed. Ziyāda, M. and al-Sayyid, R. (Beirut, 1987), pp. 29–37Google Scholar; Anonymous Commentary on Kitāb al-Tadhkira, p. 22b, 24a.
60 Mānkdīm, Taʿlīq sharḥ al-uṣūl al-khamsa, ed. ʿAbd al-Karīm ʿUthmān (Cairo, 1965) (published as al-Qāḍī ʿAbd al-Jabbār, Sharḥ al-uṣūl al-khamsa), p. 117Google Scholar.
61 Al-Khayyāṭ, al-Intiṣār, p. 31.
62 Al-Jāḥiẓ, al-Ḥayawān, ed. ʿAbd al-Salām Hārūn (Cairo, 2004), vol. 5, p. 12Google Scholar.
63 Wolfson, The Philosophy of the Kalam, p. 495.
64 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 61; Anonymous Commentary on Kitāb al-Tadhkira, pp. 27b–29b.
65 Wolfson, The Philosophy of the Kalam, p. 495.
66 Kindī, al-Jawhar, pp. 62–3.
67 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 72.
68 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 52.
69 Abū Rashīd al-Nīsābūrī, Masāʾil al-Khilāf, p. 61; al-Jāḥiẓ, al-Ḥayawān, vol. 5, p. 57.
70 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 52.
71 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 45.
72 Al-Nīsābūrī, Masāʾil al-Khilāf, p. 115.
73 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 44; al-Jāḥiẓ, al-Ḥayawān, vol. 5, 15.
74 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 55.
75 Al-Baghdādī, al-Farq bayn al-Firaq, p. 114–16.
76 Wolfson, The Philosophy of the Kalam, pp. 392–400.
77 Al-Nīsābūrī, Masāʾil al-Khilāf, p. 8.
78 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 70.
79 Kindī, al-Jawhar, p. 76.
80 Al-Jāḥiẓ, al-Hayawān, vol. 5, pp. 5–96.