Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:21:05.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reading strategy of Hong Kong school-aged children: The development of word-level and character-level processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2005

MAGGIE MUN-KI CHU  and
MAN-TAK LEUNG
MAGGIE MUN-KI CHU
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
MAN-TAK LEUNG
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the development of the mental representation of Chinese disyllabic words. Unlike alphabetical languages, Chinese is a logographic system where character is the basic unit of meaning. Most Chinese words are composed of two characters. Theoretically, Chinese compound word can be read either as a whole unit or as the component character. Subjects were asked to read aloud a list of two-character words, controlled for word and component character frequencies across grades. The correct percentage was analyzed using three two-way analyses of variance. Results indicated that children are able to make use of both levels of reading as early as Grade 1. Lower graders tended to use both the component character level reading processes more, while higher graders tended to read words as whole units more.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , October 2005 , pp. 505 - 520
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheng C. M. 1981. Perception of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23, 137– 153.Google Scholar
Goswami U. 1999. Causal connections in beginning reading: The importance of rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading 22, 217– 240.Google Scholar
Goswami U., Ziegler J. C., Dalton L., & Schneider W. 2003. Non-word reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 235– 247.Google Scholar
Ho C. S.-H., & Bryant P. 1997. Development of phonological awareness of Chinese children in Hong Kong. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 109– 126.Google Scholar
Ho C. S.-H., Chan D. W.-O., & 2000. Education Department, HKSAR Government. The Hong Kong test of specific learning difficulties in reading and writing. Hong Kong: HKSAR Government, Education Department.
Hoosain R. 1992. Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 111– 130). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Huang C. Y., & Liu Y. 1978. Effects of two-character word frequency, meaningfulness, and imagery on paired-word learning. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 20, 1– 4.Google Scholar
Law S.-P., & Leung M.-T. 2000. Structural representations of characters in Chinese writing: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Psychologia, 43, 67– 83.Google Scholar
Leong C. K., & Cheng P.-W 2003. Consistency effects on lexical decision and naming of two-character Chinese words. Reading and Writing, 16, 455– 474.Google Scholar
Leong C. K., & Tamaoka K. (Eds.) 1988. Reading and writing: Cognitive processing of Chinese and Japanese languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Leung M.-T., & Lee A. 2002. The Hong Kong corpus of primary school Chinese. Paper presented at the 9th Meeting of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association. Hong Kong.
Li C., & Thompson S. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Liu Y., & Peng D.-L. 1997. Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian Languages. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Peng D., Liu Y., & Wang C. 1999. How is access representation organized? The relation of polymorphemic words and their morphemes in Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perfetti C. A., & Tan L.-H 1999. The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115– 134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Raven J. C. 1986. Hong Kong supplement to guide to the standard progressive matrices. Hong Kong: HKSAR Government, Education Department.
Taft M. 1994. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. In D. Sandra & M. Taft (Eds.), Morphological structure, lexical representation and lexical access. East Sussex: Erlbaum.
Taft M., Huang J., & Zhu X. 1994. The influence of character frequency on word recognition responses in Chinese. In H. W. Chang, J. T. Hung, C. W. Hue, & W. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing (pp. 59– 73). Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Taft M., Liu Y., & Zhu X. 1999. Morphemic processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Taft M., & Zhu X. 1995. The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In I. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Taft M., & Zhu X. 1997. Using masked priming to examine lexical storage of Chinese compound words. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Tan L.-H., & Perfetti C. A. 1999. Phonological activation in visual identification of Chinese two-character words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 382– 393.Google Scholar
Tzang O. J.-L., Lin Z.-H., Hung D.-L., & Lee W.-L. 1995. Learning to be a conspirator: A tale of becoming a good Chinese reader. In B. de Gelder, & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading: A comparative approach. East Sussex: Erlbaum, Taylor, & Francis.
Wu J.-T., Chou T.-L., & Liu I.-M. 1994. The locus of the character/word frequency effect. In H.-W. Chang, J.-T. Jhuang, C.-W. Hue, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing (pp. 31– 58). Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Wu J.-T., & Liu I.-M. 1997. Phonological activation in pronouncing characters. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 47– 66). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Zhang B., & Peng D. 1992. Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp 131– 150). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Zhou Y. G. 1978. Xiandai Hanzihong Shenpangde Biayyin Gongeng Wenti [To what degree are the phonetics of present-day Chinese characters still phonetic?] Zhongguo Yuwen, 146, 172– 177.Google Scholar
Zhu X. 1988. Analysis of the cueing function of the phonetic in modern Chinese. Proceedings of the Symposium on Chinese Language and Character. Beijing: Guang Ming Daily Press.