Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:49:37.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Picture-naming agreement in monolingulas and biliguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Judith P. Goggin ,
Patricia Estrada  and
Ronald P. Villarreal
Judith P. Goggin*
Affiliation:
University of Texas, El Paso
Patricia Estrada
Affiliation:
University of Texas, El Paso
Ronald P. Villarreal
Affiliation:
University of Texas, El Paso
*
Dr. Judith Goggin, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968-0553
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Name agreement in Spanish and English in response to 264 pictures was assessed in monolinguals and in bilinguals, who varied in rated skill in the two languages. Most of the pictures were adapted from a standardized set of line drawings of common objects (Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 1980). Name agreement decreased as language skill decreased, and agreement was lower when labels were given in Spanish rather than in English. The relationship between name agreement and word frequency, word length, and (in the case of English) age of acquisition was assessed; both word frequency and word length were found to be related to agreement. Modal responses given by monolingual subjects were nearly identical in the two languages, and the types of non-modal responses were affected by both naming language and language skill.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 177 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, R. (1984). English: Introduction to Part Seven. In Andersen, R. (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 319–321). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1984). Cross-linguistic first language perspectives on second language acquisition research. In Andersen, R. (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 13–36). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Berman, S., Friedman, D., Hamberger, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1989). Developmental picture norms: Relationships between name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity for child and adult ratings of two sets of line drawings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 371–382.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W., & Lenneberg, E. H. (1954). A Study in language and cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 454–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Age of acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D., Jergovi, D., Imami, Z., Theodos, V., Lorick, L., & Viegas, B. (1993). Differences in monolingual and bilingual children's use of word-learning constraints. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., Jergovi, D., Imami, Z., Theodos, V., Lorick, L., & Viegas, B.Diccionario Durvan de la Lengua Española. (1964). Barcelona: Durvan, S. A., de Ediciones.Google Scholar
García-Pelayo, y Gross R. (Ed.). (1983). Pequeño Larousse Ilustrado. Mexico, D.F.: Ediciones Larousse, S.A.Google Scholar
García-Pelayo, y Gross R., & Durand, M. (1976). Diccionario Moderno Españ;ol-Inglés. Mexico, D.F.: Ediciones Larousse.Google Scholar
Ijaz, H. (1986). Linguistic and cognitive determinants of lexical acquisition in a second language. Language Learning. 36, 401–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. C. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, L. V., & Thurstone, L. L. (1955). The psychophysics of semantics: An experimental investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 39, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juilland, A., & Chang-Rodriguez, E. (1964). Frequency dictionary of Spanish words. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilborn, K., & Ito, T. (1989). Sentence processing strategies in adult bilinguals. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 257–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Lemmon, C. R., & Goggin, J. P. (1989). The measurement of bilingualism and its relationship to cognitive ability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M., & Libben, G. (1984). The recognition and use of cognates by L2 learners. In Andersen, R. W. (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 393–417). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
MacLaury, R. E. (1991). Social and cognitive motivations of change: Measuring variability in color semantics. Language, 67, 34–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsukawa, J. (1983). A study of characteristics of pictorial material. Memoirs of the faculty of law and literature: Simane University. Simane-ken, Japan: Shimane University.Google Scholar
Mosier, C. I. (1941). A psychometric study of meaning. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 101–107.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Padilla, A. M. (1977). Child bilingualism: Insights to issues. In Martinez, J. L. Jr (Ed.), Chicano psychology (pp. 111–126). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C., & Oller, D. K. (1993). Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning, 43, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In Warren, N. (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, 1–49). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Blount, B. G., & Lin, P.-J. (1991). Cross-cultural aspects of word meanings. In Schwanenflugel, P. J. (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 71–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (1962). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I and II. Psychometrika, 27, 125–140, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N.Simon and Schuster's International Dictionary: English/Spanish, Spanish/English. (1973). New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms of name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174–215.Google ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van, Schagen I., Tamsma, N., Bruggemann, F., Jackson, L. L., & Michon, J. A. (1983). Namen en normen voor plaatjes. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 38, 236–241.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1980). On semantics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1950). Four articles on metalinguistics. Washington, DC: Foreign Service Institute.Google Scholar