Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:36:42.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological awareness, letter knowledge, and literacy development in Indonesian beginner readers and spellers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2007

HEATHER WINSKEL  and
VIVILIA WIDJAJA
HEATHER WINSKEL
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney
VIVILIA WIDJAJA
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the grain size predominantly used by children learning to read and spell in Indonesian. Indonesian is an orthographically transparent language, and the syllable is a salient unit. Tasks assessing various levels of phonological awareness as well as letter knowledge, reading familiar words and nonwords, and spelling stem and affixed words were administered to children in Grade 1 and subsequently 1 year later in Grade 2. The results in general indicate that the phoneme is the prominent phonological unit in the early acquisition of reading and spelling in Indonesian, but the syllable also plays a significant role, particularly when reading long multisyllabic affixed words. This highlights the variable nature of grain size used by beginners, which is dependent on developmental stage, the demands of the task administered, and the characteristics of the language and its orthography.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 23 - 45
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams M. J. 1990. Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alcock K. J., & Ngorosho D. 2003. Learning to spell a regularly spelled language is not a trivial task—Patterns of errors in Kiswahili. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 635– 666.Google Scholar
Borzone de Manrique A. M., & Signorini A. 1994. Phonological awareness, spelling and reading abilities in Spanish-speaking children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 429– 439.Google Scholar
Bradley L., & Bryant P. E. 1983. Categorising sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 310, 419– 421.Google Scholar
Bryant P. E., MacLean M., Bradley L., & Crossland J. 1990. Rhyme, alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429– 438.Google Scholar
Byrne B., & Fielding-Barnsley R. 1993. Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 104– 111.Google Scholar
Caravolas M., & Bruck M. 1993. The effect of oral and written language input on children's phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1– 30.Google Scholar
Caravolas M., Hulme C., & Snowling M. 2001. The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751– 774.Google Scholar
Cardoso-Martins C. 1995. Sensitivity to rhymes, syllables, and phonemes in literacy acquisition in Portuguese. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 808– 828.Google Scholar
Cardoso-Martins C. 2001. The reading abilities of beginning readers of Brazilian Portugese: Implications for a theory of reading acquisition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 289– 317.Google Scholar
Carillo M. S. 1994. Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition. A study in Spanish language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 279– 298.Google Scholar
Carlisle J. F. 1995. Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189– 209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Curtin S., Manis F. R., & Seidenberg M. S. 2001. Parallels between the reading and spelling deficits of two groups of developmental dyslexics. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 515– 547.Google Scholar
Defior S., Martos F., & Cary L. 2002. Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135– 148.Google Scholar
Dewi F. 2003. Membaca menulis (13th ed., Vol. 1). Semarang, Indonesia: Mandira.
Duncan L. G., Seymour P. H. K., & Hill S. 2000. A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1081– 1104.Google Scholar
Foulin J. N. 2005. Why is letter-name knowledge such a good prector of leaning to read? Reading and Writing, 18, 129– 155.Google Scholar
Frith U. 1985. Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301– 330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goedemans R., & Zanten E. V. (2000, 31 May). Bahasa indonesia, 2004, from http://www.let.leidenuniv.nl/ulcl/pil/.
Gomez C., & Reason R. 2002. Cross-linguistic transfer of phonological skills: A Malaysian perspective. Dyslexia, 8, 22– 33.Google Scholar
Goswami U. 1999. The relationship between phonological awareness and orthographic representation in different orthographies. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 51– 70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goswami U. 2000. Phonological representations, reading development and dyslexia: Towards a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia 6, 133– 151.Google Scholar
Goswami U. 2002. In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme, Hatcher, Nation, Brown, Adams and Stuart. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 47– 57.Google Scholar
Goswami U., & Bryant P. E. 1990. Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goswami U., Ziegler J. C., Dalton L., & Schneider W. 2003. Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 235– 247.Google Scholar
Hansen J., & Bowey J. A. 1994. Phonological analysis skills, verbal working memory and reading ability in second grade children. Child Development, 65, 938– 950.Google Scholar
Holmes V. M., & Carruthers J. 1998. The relation between reading and spelling in skilled adult readers. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 264– 289.Google Scholar
Hulme C., Hatcher P. J., Nation K., Brown A., Adams J., & Stuart G. 2002. Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2– 28.Google Scholar
Jimenéz González J. E., & del Rosario Ortiz González M. 2000. Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition in the Spanish language. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3, 37– 46.Google Scholar
Lennox C., & Siegel L. S. 1993. Visual and phonological spelling errors in subtypes of children with learning disabilities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 473– 488.Google Scholar
Liow S. J., & Lee L. C. 2004. Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children's spelling errors in Malay. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 7– 26.Google Scholar
Maclean M., Bryant P. E., & Bradley L. 1987. Rhymes, nursery rhymes and reading in early childhood. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255– 282.Google Scholar
Moeliono A. M., & Dardjowidjojo S. (Eds.). 1988. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka.
Muter V., Hulme C., Snowling M., & Taylor S. 1997. Segmentation, not rhyming predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 370– 396.Google Scholar
Öney B., & Durgunoğlu A. Y. 1997. Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1– 15.Google Scholar
Padakannaya P., Rekka D., Vaid J., & Joshi M. 2002. Simultaneous acquisition of literacy skills in English and Kannada. A longitudinal study. Singapore: International Association of Applied Linguistics.
Prentice D. J. 1987. Malay (Indonesian and Malaysian). In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world's major languages. London: Croom Helm.
Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia yang Disempurnakan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka.
Shatil E., Share D., & Levin I. 2000. On the contribution of kindergarten writing to Grade 1 literacy: A longitudinal study in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 1– 21.Google Scholar
Sneddon J. 2003. The Indonesian language: Its history and role in modern society. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales.
Snowling M. J., Goulandris N., Bowlby M., & Howell P. 1986. Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: A developmental analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 489– 507.Google Scholar
Stanovich K. E., Cunningham A. E., & Cramer B. B. 1984. Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children. Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175– 190.Google Scholar
Stuart M., & Coltheart M. 1988. Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? Cognition, 30, 139– 181.Google Scholar
Thorstad G. 1991. The effect of orthography on the acquisition of literacy skills. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 527– 537.Google Scholar
Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Bahasa (Ed.). 2001. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka.
Treiman R. 1997. Beginning to spell in English. In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 371– 393). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Treiman R., & Cassar M. 1996. Effects of morphology on children's spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 141– 170.Google Scholar
Treiman R., Mullennix J., & Bijeljac-Babic R. 1995. The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107– 136.Google Scholar
Treiman R., Tincoff R., & Richmond-Welty E. D. 1996. Letter names help children to connect print and speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 505– 514.Google Scholar
Treiman R., & Zukowski A. 1996. Children's sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 193– 215.Google Scholar
Tunmer W., & Nesdale A. 1985. Phonemic segmentation skill and beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 417– 427.Google Scholar
Wimmer H., & Goswami U. 1994. The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91– 103.Google Scholar
Wimmer H., & Hummer P. 1990. How German speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349– 368.Google Scholar
Ziegler J. C., & Goswami U. 2005. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic gram size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3– 29.Google Scholar