Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T19:32:53.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of multilingualism on phonetic perceptual flexibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Janet F. Werker
Janet F. Werker*
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University and The University of British Columbia
*
Janet F. Werker, Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., CanadaV6T 1Y7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research was designed to explore whether maintenance of the ability to discriminate phonetic distinctions requires specific linguistic/perceptual experience, or whether broadened but nonrelevant linguistic experience can result in generalized perceptual flexibility. To explore this question, bilingual and trilingual adult subjects were compared to monolingual English adults on their ability to discriminate phonetic distinctions that are not used in (any of) their native language(s). Results suggest that broadened, nonspecific linguistic experience does not contribute to increased perceptual flexibility.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 141 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aslin, R. N., & Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Some developmental processes in speech perception. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F., & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Child phonology. Vol. 2: Perception (pp. 67–96). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Pisoni, D. B., Hennessy, B. L., & Perey, A. J. (1981). Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: New findings and implications for the effects of early experience. Child Development. 52, 1135–1145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Zeev, S. (1977). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive strategy and cognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1009–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, E., Widin, G. P., & Viemeister, N. F. (1977). Non-categorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 961–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, C., & Shen, M. (1971). Some language-related cognitive advantages of bilingual five-year-olds. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 118, 235–244.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (1981). Roles of early experience in species-specific perceptual development. In Aslin, R. N., Peters, J. R., & Petersen, M. R. (Eds.), Development of Perception, Vol. 1 (pp. 5–43). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424–429.Google Scholar
Ianco-Worrall, A. D. (1972). Bilingualism and cognitive development. Child Development, 43, 1390–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, C., & Quinn, M. E. (1980). Positive effects of bilingualism on science problem-solving abilities. In Alah, J. E. (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1980: Current issues in bilingual education. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Laksy, R. E., Syrdal-Lasky, A., & Klein, R. E. (1975). VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month old infants from Spanish environments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 215–225.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1970). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Hála, B., Romportl, M., & Janota, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
MacKain, K. S., Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKain, K. S., & Stern, D. N. (1982). The concept of experience in speech development. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children’s language, Vol. 6. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Marascuilo, L. A. (1966). Large-scale multiple comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 280–290.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. P., Aslin, R. N., Perey, A. J., & Hennessy, B. L. (1979). Identifications and discriminations of a new linguistic contrast: Some effects of laboratory training on speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 65(1), (5511).Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1979). Problem solving and education. In Turna, D. T. & Reif, F. (Eds.), Problem solving and education: Issues in reaching and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Streeter, L. A. (1976). Language perception of two-month-old infant shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience. Nature, 259, 39–41.Google Scholar
Tees, R. C., & Werker, J. F. (1984). Perceptual flexibility: Maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34(4), 579–590.Google Scholar
Thoradike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247–261, 384–395, 593–594.Google Scholar
Trehub, S. E. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Child Development, 47, 466–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S. (1985). Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 37(1), 35–44.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1983). Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of non-active speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 278–286.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984a). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984b). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(6), 1866–1878.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development, 52, 349–353.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1980). Phonetic variation as a function of second language learning. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F., & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Child phonology. Vol. 2: Perception (pp. 185–216). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar