Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:58:59.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perception of transient nonspeech stimuli is normal in specific language impairment: Evidence from glide discrimination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2005

D. V. M. BISHOP ,
C. V. ADAMS ,
K. NATION  and
S. ROSEN
D. V. M. BISHOP
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
C. V. ADAMS
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
K. NATION
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
S. ROSEN
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Twenty 9- to 12-year-olds with specific language impairment (SLI) were compared with 18 age-matched controls on auditory discrimination tasks, using a three-interval, two-alternative forced-choice format. The first task used minimal word pairs in silence and in noise. Nonspeech tasks involved discriminating direction of frequency glides and had two versions: (a) the glide moved from 500 to 1500 Hz, and duration was adaptively decreased; (b) all glides lasted 250 ms, and the frequency range was adaptively modified until a threshold was reached. Control and SLI groups did not differ on the glide tasks. Around half the children in both groups accurately discriminated 20 ms glides. There was a small but significant group difference on the speech-in-noise task, and scores were weakly related to literacy level. Perception of brief, transient, nonspeech stimuli is not abnormal in the majority of school-aged children with SLI.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 175 - 194
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlard A., & Hazan V. 1998. Speech perception in children with specific reading difficulties (dyslexia). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 153– 177.Google Scholar
Belin P., Zilbovicius M., Crozier S., Thivard L., & Fontaine A. 1998. Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 536– 540.Google Scholar
Benasich A. A., & Tallal P. 2002. Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behavioural Brain Research, 136, 31– 49.Google Scholar
Bishop D. V. M. 2003. The Test for Reception of Grammar, version 2 (TROG-2). London: Psychological Corporation.
Bishop D. V. M. 2004. Expression, Reception and Recall of Narrative Instrument (ERRNI). London: Psychological Corporation.
Bishop D. V. M., Bishop S. J., Bright P., James C., Delaney T., & Tallal P. 1999. Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in children with language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 155– 168.Google Scholar
Bishop D. V. M., Carlyon R. P., Deeks J. M., & Bishop S. J. 1999. Auditory temporal processing impairment: neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 1295– 1310.Google Scholar
Bishop D. V. M., & McArthur G. M. 2004. Immature cortical responses to auditory stimuli in specific language impairment: Evidence from ERPs to rapid tone sequences. Developmental Science, 7, F11– F18.Google Scholar
Bishop D. V. M., & McArthur G. A. (in press). Individual differences in auditory processing in specific language impairment: A follow-up study using event-related potentials and behavioural thresholds. Cortex.
Breier J. I., Gray L. C., Fletcher J. M., Foorman B., & Klaas P. 2002. Perception of speech and nonspeech stimuli by children with and without reading disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 226– 250.Google Scholar
Bretherton L., & Holmes V. M. 2003. The relationship between auditory temporal processing, phonemic awareness, and reading disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 218– 243.Google Scholar
Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K., Cox R., Hagerman B., Hetu R., Kei J., Lui C., Kiessling J., Kotby M., Nasser N., El Kholy W. A. H., Nakanishi Y., Oyer H., Powell R., Stephens D., Meredith R., Sirimanna T., Tavartkiladze G., Frolenkov G. I., Westerman S., & Ludvigsen C. 1994. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2108– 2120.Google Scholar
Clark M. G., Rosen G. D., Tallal P., & Fitch R. H. 2000. Impaired processing of complex auditory stimuli in rats with induced cerebrocortical microgyria: An animal model of developmental language disabilities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 828– 839.Google Scholar
Evans J. L., Viele K., Kass R. E., & Tang F. 2002. Grammatical morphology and perception of synthetic and natural speech in children with specific language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 494– 504.Google Scholar
Farmer M. E., & Klein R. M. 1993. Auditory and visual temporal processing in dyslexic and normal readers. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 339– 341.Google Scholar
Fiez J. A., Raichle M. E., Miezin F. M., Petersen S. E., Tallal P., & Katz W. F. 1995. PET studies of auditory and phonological processing: effects of stimulus characteristics and task demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 357– 375.Google Scholar
Findlay J. M. 1978. Estimates on probability functions: A more virulent PEST. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 181– 185.Google Scholar
Goswami U. 2003. Why theories about developmental dyslexia require developmental designs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 534– 540.Google Scholar
Goswami U., Thomson J., Richardson U., Stainthorp R., Hughes D., Rosen S., & Scott S. K. 2002. Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: a new hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 10911– 10916.Google Scholar
Heath S. M., Hogben J. H., & Clark C. D. 1999. Auditory temporal processing in disabled readers with and without oral language delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 637– 647.Google Scholar
Heiervang E., Stevenson J., & Hugdahl K. 2002. Auditory processing in children with dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 931– 938.Google Scholar
Hulslander J., Talcott J., Witton C., DeFries J., Pennington B., Wadsworth S., Willcutt E., & Olson R. 2004. Sensory processing, reading, IQ, and attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 274– 295.Google Scholar
Joanisse M. F., & Gati J. S. 2003. Overlapping neural regions for processing rapid temporal cues in speech and nonspeech signals. Neuroimage, 19, 64– 79.Google Scholar
Johnsrude I. S., Zatorre R. J., Milner B. A., & Evans A. C. 1997. Left-hemisphere specialization for the processing of acoustic transients. Neuroreport, 8, 1761– 1765.Google Scholar
Leppänen P. H., & Lyytinen H. 1997. Auditory event-related potentials in the study of developmental language-related disorders. Audiology and Neurootology, 2, 308– 340.Google Scholar
Lincoln A. J., Dickstein P., Courchesne E., Elmasian R., & Tallal P. 1992. Auditory processing abilities in non-retarded adolescents and young adults with developmental receptive language disorder and autism. Brain and Language, 43, 613– 622.Google Scholar
Manis F. R., McBride–Chang C., Seidenberg M. S., Keating P., Doi I. M., Munson B., & Peterson A. 1997. Are speech perception deficits associated with developmental dyslexia? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 211– 235.Google Scholar
Marshall C. M., Snowling M. J., & Bailey P. J. 2001. Rapid auditory processing and phonological ability in normal readers and readers with dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 925– 940.Google Scholar
McArthur G. M., & Bishop D. V. M. 2001. Auditory perceptual processing in people with reading and oral language impairments: current issues and recommendations. Dyslexia, 7, 150– 170.Google Scholar
McArthur G. M., & Bishop D. V. M. 2004a. Which people with specific language impairment have auditory processing deficits? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 79– 94.Google Scholar
McArthur G. M., & Bishop D. V. M. 2004b. Frequency discrimination deficits in people with specific language impairment: reliability, validity, and linguistic correlates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47.Google Scholar
McArthur G. M., & Hogben J. H. 2001. Auditory backward recognition masking in children with a specific language impairment and children with a specific reading disability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1092– 1100.Google Scholar
Müller R. A., Kleinhans N., & Courchesne E. 2001. Broca's area and the discrimination of frequency transitions: A functional MRI study. Brain and Language, 76, 70– 76.Google Scholar
Neville H. J., Coffey S. A., Holcomb P. J., & Tallal P. 1993. The neurobiology of sensory and language processing in language-impaired children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 235– 253.Google Scholar
Nittrouer S. 1999. Do temporal processing deficits cause phonological processing problems? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 925– 942.Google Scholar
Norrelgen F., Lacerda F., & Forssberg H. 2002. Temporal resolution of auditory perception and verbal working memory in 15 children with language impairment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 539– 545.Google Scholar
Poeppel D. 2003. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as “asymmetric sampling in time.” Speech Communication, 41, 245– 255.Google Scholar
Rosen S. 2003. Auditory processing in dyslexia and specific language impairment. Is there a deficit? What is its nature? Does it explain anything? Journal of Phonetics, 31, 509– 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rust J., Golombok S., & Trickey G. 1993. Wechsler Objective Reading Dimensions. Sidcup: Psychological Corporation.
Share D. L., Jorm A. F., Maclean R., & Matthews R. 2002. Temporal processing and reading disability. Reading and Writing, 15, 151– 178.Google Scholar
Stark R. E., & Heinz J. M. 1996. Perception of stop consonants in children with expressive and receptive-expressive language impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 676– 686.Google Scholar
Stark R. E., & Tallal P. 1988. Language, speech and reading disorders in children. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
Studdert–Kennedy M., & Mody M. 1995. Auditory temporal perception deficits in the reading-impaired: A critical review of the evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 508– 514.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe P. 2003. Auditory processing performance in young children: Attention is needed. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oxford University, Oxford.
Talcott J., Witton C., McClean M., Hansen P., Rees A., Green G., & Stein J. 1999. Can sensitivity to auditory frequency modulation predict children's phonological and reading skills? Neuroreport, 10, 2045– 2050.Google Scholar
Talcott J. B., Witton C., McLean M. F., Hansen P. C., Rees A., Green G. G. R., & Stein J. F. 2000. Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 2952– 2957.Google Scholar
Tallal P. 1980. Auditory temporal perception, phonics and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182– 198.Google Scholar
Tallal P. 2000. Experimental studies of language learning impairments: From research to remediation. In D. V. M. Bishop & L. B. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 131– 155). Hove: Psychology Press.
Tallal P., & Piercy M. 1973a. Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental dysphasia. Nature, 241, 468– 469.Google Scholar
Tallal P., & Piercy M. 1973b. Developmental aphasia: Impaired rate of non-verbal processing as a function of sensory modality. Neuropsychologia, 11, 389– 398.Google Scholar
Tallal P., & Stark R. E. 1981. Speech acoustic-cue discrimination abilities of normally developing and language-impaired children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 568– 574.Google Scholar
Tallal P., Stark R., & Curtiss B. 1976. Relation between speech perception and speech production in children with developmental dysphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 305– 317.Google Scholar
Tallal P., Townsend J., Curtiss S., & Wulfeck B. 1991. Phenotypic profiles of language-impaired children based on genetic/family history. Brain and Language, 41, 81– 95.Google Scholar
Tomblin J. B., & Quinn M. A. 1983. The contribution of perceptual learning to performance on the repetition task. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 369– 372.Google Scholar
Torgesen J. K., Wagner R., & Rashotte C. 1999. Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). New York: Psychological Corporation.
Troia G. A., & Whitney S. D. 2003. A close look at the efficacy of FastForWord Language for children with academic weaknesses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 465– 494.Google Scholar
Van der Lely H. K. J., Rosen S., & Adlard A. 2004. Grammatical language impairment and the specificity of cognitive domains: relations between auditory and language abilities. Cognition.Google Scholar
Waber D. P., Weiler M. D., Wolff P. H., Bellinger D., Marcus D. J., Ariel R., Forbes P., & Wypij D. 2001. Processing of rapid auditory stimuli in school-age children referred for evaluation of learning disorders. Child Development, 72, 37– 49.Google Scholar
Wechsler D. 1999. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Whitfield I. C., & Evans E. F. 1965. Responses of auditory cortical neurons to stimuli of changing frequency. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 655– 672.Google Scholar
Witton C., Talcott J. B., Hansen P. C., Richardson A. J., Griffiths T. D., Rees A., Stein J. F., & Green G. G. R. 1998. Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers. Current Biology, 8, 791– 797.Google Scholar
Wright B. A., Lombardino L. J., King W. M., Puranik C. S., Leonard C. M., & Merzenich M. M. 1997. Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature, 387, 176– 178.Google Scholar