Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:25:59.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flux ratios for biological membranes and reciprocity theorems for linear operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

A. J. Bracken ,
K. Holmåker ,
L. V. Maloney  and
L. Bass
A. J. Bracken
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
K. Holmåker
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Göteborg, Sweden.
L. V. Maloney
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
L. Bass
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The constancy in time of the ratio of unidirectional tracer fluxes, passing in opposite directions through a membrane that has transport properties varying arbitrarily with the distance from a boundary face, has been established recently for successively more sophisticated mathematical models of tracer transport within the membrane. Such results are important in that, when constancy is not observed experimentally, inferences can be drawn about the dimensionality of distributions of transport properties of the membrane. The known theoretical results are shown here to follow from much more general theorems, valid for a wide class of models based on linear-operator equations, including elliptic and hyperbolic partial differential equations as well as the essentially parabolic equations of interest in membrane transport problems. These theorems have the general character of “reciprocity theorems” known for a long time in other areas, such as mechanics, acoustics and elasticity. The general results obtained here clarify the conditions on membrane properties under which constancy of a flux ratio can be expected. In addition, flux ratio theorems of a new type are proved to hold under suitable conditions, for the normal components of flux vectors at points on either side of a membrane, as distinct from previously established theorems for total fluxes through membrane faces. Possible new experiments are suggested by the analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , January 1989 , pp. 278 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1989

References

[1]Achenbach, J. D., Wave propagation in elastic solids (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973).Google Scholar
[2]Bass, L., “The unidirectional flux transient as a tool for quantifying parallel diffusional pathways through membranes: exact solution for two pathways”, Bull. Math. Biol. 47 (1985) 425–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[3]Bass, L. and Bracken, A. J., “The flux-ratio under nonstationary boundary conditions”, Math. Biosci. 66 (1983) 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bass, L., Bracken, A. J. and Hilden, J., “Flux ratio theorems for nonstationary membrane transport with temporary capture of tracer”, J. Theoret. Biol. 118 (1986) 327–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[5]Bass, L. and McAnally, D. S., “The ratio of nonstationary tracer fluxes into and out of a hollow circular cylinder”, J. Membr. Biol. 81 (1984) 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Courant, R. and Hilbert, D., Methods of mathematical physics Vol. 1 (Interscience, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
[7]Doetsch, G., Introduction to the theory and application of the Laplace transformation (translated by Nader, W.), (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Eringen, A. C. and Suhubi, E. S., Elastodynamics 2 (Academic Press, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
[9]Hunter, J. L., Acoustics (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1957) 319;Google Scholar
Chertock, G., “General reciprocity relation”, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 34 (1962) 989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Junger, M. C. and Feit, D., Sound, structures and their interaction (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1972).Google Scholar
[11]Lamb, H., “On reciprocal theorems in dynamics”, Proc. London Math. Soc. 19 (1889) 144–151.Google Scholar
[12]Rogers, C. and Bracken, A. J., “On a ratio theorem for a class of nonlinear boundary value problems”, Quart. Appl. Math. 44 (1987) 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Sommerfeld, A., Partial differential equations in physics (Academic Press, New York, 1964).Google Scholar
[14]Sten-Knudsen, O. and Ussing, H. H., “The flux-ratio under nonstationary conditions”, J. Membr. Biol. 63 (1981) 223–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[15]Ussing, H. H., “Interpretation of tracer fluxes”, in Membrane transport in biology. Vol. 1 (eds. Giebisch, G., Tosteson, D. C. and Ussing, H. H.), (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978), 115–140.Google Scholar
[16]Ussing, H. H., Eskesen, K. and Lim, J., “The flux-ratio transients as a tool for separating transport paths”, in Epithelial ion and water transport (eds. Macknight, A. D. C. and Leader, J. P.), (Raven Press, New York, 1981) 257–264.Google Scholar