Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:24:37.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spurii and the Roman View of Illegitimacy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Beryl Rawson
Beryl Rawson*
Affiliation:
The Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘Illegitimacy has been called a social problem for the last two centuries and a moral problem from time immemorial’ (Laslett 1980: 1). Many studies of ancient Roman society have dwelt on morals, and many texts of Roman law give much detail on family law and the law of persons. By contrast with studies of modern law and society, however, there has been little focus on the ‘idea’ of illegitimacy in ancient Rome and no extended discussion of what was involved in being an illegitimate child in that society.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 23 , 1989 , pp. 10 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariès, P., (1962) Centuries of childhood: a social history of family life. London.Google Scholar
Astolfi, R., (1970) La lexlulia et apia. Padua.Google Scholar
Bradley, K.R., (1984) Slaves and masters in the Roman Empire. A study in social control. Brussels.Google Scholar
Buckland, W.W., (1963) A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd edn rev. Stein, P.. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Castello, C., (1950) ‘Sulla condizione del figlio concepito legittimamente e illegittimameme nel diritto romano’ RIDA 4, 267–96.Google Scholar
Corbett, P.E., (1930) The Roman law of marriage. Oxford. Reprinted 1969.Google Scholar
Crook, J.A., (1967) Law and life of Rome. London.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Davis, (1939) ‘Illegitimacy and the social structure,’ AJSoc. 45, 215–33.Google Scholar
Eyben, E., (1973) ‘Roman notes on the course of life,’ Ancient Society (Louvain) 4, 213–38.Google Scholar
Cissie, Fairchilds, (1978a) ‘Female sexual attitudes and the rise of illegitimacy: a case study,’ JIH 8, 627–67.Google Scholar
Cissie, Fairchilds, (1978b) ‘Reply,’ JIH 9, 309–21.Google Scholar
Flory, M.B., (1978) ‘Family in familia: kinship and community in slavery,’ AJAH 3,78–95.Google Scholar
Gardner, Jane F., (1986) ‘Proofs of status in the Roman world,’ BICS 33, 1–14.Google Scholar
Goode, W.J., (1982) The family, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, H.F., (1954) ‘The stone that the builders rejected: adventures of some civil law texts,’ Seminar 12, 44.Google Scholar
Max, Kaser, (1971) Das römischen Privatrecht I. München.Google Scholar
Fabio, Lanfranchi, (1964) Ricerche sulle azioni di stato nellafilazione in diritto romano. II. La c.d. presunzione di paternità. Bologna.Google Scholar
Peter, Laslett, and Karla, Oosterveen, and Smith, Richard M., (ed.) (1980) Bastardy and its comparative history. London.Google Scholar
Alan, Macfarlane, (1980) ‘Illegitimacy and illegitimates in English history,’ pp. 71–85 of Laslett (1980).Google Scholar
Manson, M., (1983) ‘The emergence of the small child in Rome,’ History of Education 12, 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, P.M., (1895) Der römischen Konkubinat nach den Rechtsquellen und den Inschriften. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C., (1966) L’ordre équestre à I’époque républicaine I. Paris.Google Scholar
Marian, Niziolek, (1975) ‘Meaning of the phrase liberi naturales in Roman law sources up to Constantine’s reign,’ RIDA 22, 317–44.Google Scholar
Linda, Pollock, (1983) Forgotten children. Parent-child relations from 1500 to 1900. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Purcell, (1986) ‘Livia and the womanhood of Rome,’ PCPhilol. Soc. 32, 77–105.Google Scholar
Jacques, Ramin, and Paul, Veyne, (1981) ‘Droit romaine et societe: les hommes libres qui passent pour esclaves et l’esclavage volontaire,’ Historia 30, 472–97.Google Scholar
Beryl, Rawson, (1966) ‘Family life among the lower classes at Rome in the first two centuries of the Empire,’ CPh 61, 71–83.Google Scholar
Beryl, Rawson, (1974) ‘Roman concubinage and other de facto marriages,’ TAPA 104, 279–305.Google Scholar
Beryl, Rawson, (ed.) (1986) The family in ancient Rome. New perspectives. London and Ithaca.Google Scholar
Richard, Saller, (1984) ‘Familia, domus and the Roman concept of the family,’ Phoenix 38, 336–55.Google Scholar
Richard, Saller, (1984) ‘Familia, domus and the Roman concept of the family,’ Continuity and Change 1, 7–22.Google Scholar
Sanders, H.A., (1928) ‘A birth certificate of the year 145 A.D.,’ AJA 32, 309–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, Shaw, (1987) ‘The age of Roman girls at marriage: some reconsiderations,’ JRS 77, 30–46.Google Scholar
Solin, H., (1971) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der griechischen Personennamen in Rom I. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Spruit, J.E., (1969) Die lex Iulia et Papia Poppaea. Leiden.Google Scholar
Syme, R., (1960) ‘Bastards in the Roman aristocracy,’ Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104, 323–7.Google Scholar
Syme, R., (1980) ‘No son for Caesar?’ Historia 29, 422–437.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R., (1952–54) ‘The four urban tribes and the four regions of ancient Rome,’ Rend Pont Acc. 27, 225–38.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R., (1960) The voting districts of the Roman republic. Rome.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R., (1961) ‘Freedmen and freeborn in the epitaphs of imperial Rome,’ AJP 82, 113–32.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S.M., (1981a) ‘Concubinae,’ PBSR 49, 59–81.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S.M., (1981b) ‘Contubernales in CIL 6,’ Phoenix 35, 42–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edoardo, Volterra, (1972) ‘Iniustum matrimonium’, Studi in onore di Gaetano Scherillo 2, 441–70.Google Scholar
Wolff, H.J., (1945) ‘The background of the post-classical legislation on illegitimacy,’ Seminar 3, 21–45.Google Scholar