Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:53:12.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular evolutionary relationships of the octopodid genus Thaumeledone (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) from the Southern Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2008

J.M. Strugnell ,
M.A. Collins  and
A.L. Allcock
J.M. Strugnell*
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
M.A. Collins
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
A.L. Allcock
Affiliation:
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
*
*[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent trawling in the Southern Ocean has yielded individuals of a number of species of the deep sea octopod genus Thaumeledone. This paper provides the first molecular study of the genus, employing molecular sequences from five mitochondrial (12S rDNA, 16S rDNA, COI, COIII, cytochrome oxidase b) and a single nuclear gene (rhodopsin) and includes representatives of each of the known Southern Ocean species. Thaumeledone rotunda, believed to be circumpolar in distribution and found in relatively deep water is the sister taxa to T. gunteri, known only from South Georgia. A notable level of sequence variability was evident between a T. peninsulae individual recently captured from the Powell Basin, and two T. peninsulae individuals captured from the continental slope, north of the South Shetland Islands. This is likely to represent population level intraspecific variation within this species.

Keywords

Antarctic Peninsulaintraspecific variationoctopusScotia SeaSouth Georgia
Type
Research Article
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 20 , Issue 3: BIOPEARL Cruise in the Scotia Sea , June 2008 , pp. 245 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allcock, A.L., Collins, M.A., Piatkowski, U. & Vecchione, M. 2004. Thaumeledone and other deep water octopodids from the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Research II, 51, 1883–1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcock, A.L., Strugnell, J.M., Prodöhl, P., Piatkowski, U. & Vecchione, M. 2007. A new species of Pareledone (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) from the Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biology, 30, 883–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlini, D.B., Young, R.E. & Vecchione, M. 2001. A molecular phylogeny of the Octopoda (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) evaluated in light of morphological evidence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 21, 388–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294–299.Google ScholarPubMed
Guzik, M.T., Norman, M.D. & Crozier, R.H. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of the benthic shallow-water octopuses (Cephalopoda: Octopodinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 37, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebert, P.D.N., Stoeckle, M.Y., Zemlack, T.S. & Francis, C.M. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology, 2, e312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochberg, F.G., Nixon, M. & Toll, R.B. 1992. Order Octopoda Leach 1818. In Sweeny, M.J., Roper, C.F.E., Mangold, K.M., Clarke, M.R., Boletzky, S.V., eds. “Larval” and Juvenile Cephalopods: a manual for their identification. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, number 513, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Moore, W.S. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution, 49, 718–726.Google ScholarPubMed
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A.J. 2003. Tracer. 1.0.1 Oxford University, http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. 2002. Se-Al v2.0a11 Carbon Oxford University, http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/.Google Scholar
Rogers, A.D. 2007. Evolution and biodiversity of Antarctic organisms: a molecular perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B363, 2191–2214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, C.F.E. & Voss, G.L. 1983. Guidelines for taxonomic descriptions of cephalopod species. Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria, 44, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4, 406–425.Google Scholar
Simon, C., Paabo, S., Kocher, T. & Wilson, A.C. 1990. Evolution of the mitochondrial ribosomal RNA in insects as shown by the polymerase chain reaction. In Clegg, M. & O'Brian, S., eds. Molecular evolution, UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology, New Series, vol. 122. New York: Alan R. Liss, 142–180 pp.Google Scholar
Simon, C., Franke, A., Martin, A.P. 1991. The polymerase chain reaction: DNA extraction and amplification. In Hewitt, G.M., Johnston, A.W.B. & Young, J.P.W., eds. Molecular techniques in taxonomy. Berlin: Springer, 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenback, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H. & Flook, P. 1994. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87, 651–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strugnell, J.M., Norman, M.D., Drummond, A.J. & Cooper, A. 2004. The octopuses that never came back to earth: neotenous origins for pelagic octopuses. Current Biology, 18, R300–R301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D.L. 1998. PAUP*4.0 - Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods) Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Taggart, J.B., Hynes, R.A., Prodöhl, P.A. & Ferguson, A. 1992. A simplified protocol for routine total DNA isolation from salmonid fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 40, 963–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voight, J.R. 1993. A cladistic reassessment of octopodid classification. Malacologia, 35, 343–349.Google Scholar
Voss, G.L. 1988. Evolution and phylogenetic relationships of deep-sea octopods (cirrata and incirrata). In Clarke, M.R. & Trueman, E.R., eds. The Mollusca, vol. 12. Paleontology and Neontology of Cepahlopods.London: Academic Press, 253–276.Google Scholar