Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:04:14.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pentelethen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2013

Extract

One might give as sub-title ‘Attic Marble: Science and Common Sense’. The names by which Greek marbles are usually known have been gravely questioned in recent years. In a very important article in the Annual for 1968, Mr. Colin Renfrew and Mr. J. Springer Peacey emphasized the need for more scientific research and further development of new methods before one could safely attach the common labels—‘Pentelic’, ‘Hymettan,’ ‘Parian,’ ‘Naxian,’ or ‘Island’. ‘Most of the attributions hitherto made’, they said, ‘and hence the various observations based on them, are not well founded’; and later, ‘If “Hymettan” merely means “finegrained grey”, and “Naxian” simply “coarse-grained white” there seems little point in using the geographic terms. Such a usage denies the hope that the origin of the various marble used for Greek sculpture may one day be better understood.’

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Aegean Marble: a Petrological Study’, BSA lxiii (1968) 45 ff.; cf. Ashmole, B., BSA lxv (1970) 12.Google Scholar Norman Herz and W. Kendrick Pritchett dealt with the difficulties of nomenclature of marbles in epigraphy in AJA lvii (1953) 71–83. Evelyn Harrison raises the question in the Preface to The Athenian Agora, xi, Archaic and Archaistic Sculpture (Princeton 1965), and retains the use of ‘Pentelic’ and ‘Hymettian’, with due caution (needed especially where Archaic work is concerned).

2 IG ii2. 1665, lines 5–8; this stone is generally thought to be conglomerate (though it has been suggested that it is Kara limestone); see Martin, R., Manuel d'architecture grecque i (Paris 1965) 114, 129.Google Scholar I give references here only for the less common stones; see further Martin, op. cit. 117, 120, 129–31.

3 IG i2. 336, line 7.

4 IG ii2. 1665, line 25; cf. Pausanias, i. 44. 6.

5 See Herz, Norman, ‘Geology of the Building Stones of Ancient Greece’, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, xvii (1955) 499–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 IG ii2. 1666, lines 8, 16, 24–5.

7 IG ii2 1672, lines 21, 48, 52; Martin, op. cit. 114–15.

8 See Stanier, R. S., ‘The Cost of the Parthenon’, JHS lxxiii (1953) 6874CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Burford, Alison, ‘The Builders of the Parthenon’, Greece and Rome, Supplement to vol. x, 2335.Google Scholar

9 Carpenter, Rhys, The Architects of the Parthenon (Penguin, 1970).Google Scholar

10 Martin, op. cit. 164–72.

11 IG i2. 363, line 46.

12 IG ii2. 1673, line 21.

13 IG i2. 348 ff.

14 And for some architectural details in the upper parts: Morgan, C. H., Hesperia xxxi (1962) 211 ff.Google Scholar, 221 ff.; xxxii (1963) 91 ff. (n.b. 108).

15 IG i2. 363, lines 35, 46.

16 IG i2. 373 and 374.

17 Dinsmoor, W. B., The Architecture of Ancient Greece (London and New York, 1950) 180–2Google Scholar; Hodge, A. T. and Tomlinson, R. A., AJA lxxiii (1969) 185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 ‘Greek Marbles, Determination of Provenance by Isotopic Analysis’, Science clxxvi (28 April 1972) (Professor N. Herz kindly sent me a copy of this).

19 Lines A35, 49, 65, 83, 97, B18; aspilos does not mean that the blocks must be delivered free from superficial stains (these would disappear in the final trimming), but free from disfiguring blemishes in the stone. Cf. Pliny, xxxvi. 44, ‘non fuisse tum auctoritatem maculoso marmori’.

20 McAllister, M. H., Hesperia xxviii (1959) 2Google Scholar; cf. Lepsius, R., Geologie von Attika (Berlin, 1863) 18Google Scholar, for such marble on Pentelikon.

21 Thompson, H. A. and Wycherley, R. E., The Agora of Athens (Princeton, 1972) 165.Google Scholar

22 Ibid. 166, 167.

23 See R. Lepsius, op. cit., Taf. i.

24 Shoe, Lucy, ‘Dark Stone in Greek Architecture’, Hesperia Suppl. viii (1949) 341–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. Thompson, H. A., Hesperia vi (1937) 46–7.Google Scholar

25 IG ii2. 1668, lines 32–3, 59–60.

26 Thompson and Wycherley, op. cit. 37–8, 104.

27 Ibid. 109; IG ii2 1685 lines B2 2–3, B4 3.