Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:19:45.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations in aerologically derived Arctic precipitation and snowfall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark C. Serreze
Affiliation:
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, U.S.A.
Mark C. Rehder
Affiliation:
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, U.S.A.
Roger G. Barry
Affiliation:
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, U.S.A.
John E. Walsh
Affiliation:
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois–Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
David A. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data from a rawinsonde network are used to provide aerological estimates of monthly precipitation minus evaporation (P – E) averaged over the region north of 70° N. Using published climatological estimates of E, area-averaged P is obtained for each month and year as a residual. Using surface temperatures from the rawinsonde network, the fraction of precipitation falling as snow is then estimated. Over the 1974–91 study period, precipitation and snowfall (water equivalent) have annual means of 26.6 and 19.0 cm. respectively. Assuming a representative aged snowpack density of 330 kg m−3 yields a total snow depth of 57.5 cm. The mean annual cycles of both variables display an autumn maximum, but because of the temperature dependency, nearly all precipitation falls as rain during July and August. Composite analyses reveal that increased precipitation for all seasons and increased snowfall for winter and autumn are favored by a “winter-type” circulation pattern, characterized by stronger troughs over the Atlantic and Eurasian sectors of the Arctic, associated with increased cyclonic activity over the Arctic peripheral seas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1995

1. Introduction

Increasing recognition of the importance of the Arctic in the global climate system points to the need for improved assessments of Arctic precipitation and snowfall. The existence of the ice cover strongly depends on the maintenance of a relatively fresh low-density surface layer, driven primarily by precipitation over land and subsequent fresh-water inflow by rivers, but also by precipitation over sea-ice and open-water areas, and summer melt (Reference Aagaard and CarmackAagaard and Carmack, 1989). A significant contributory factor is the high surface albedo of the ice cover which, when fully snow-covered in May, may exceed 80% (Reference Robinson, Serreze, Barry, Scharfen and Kukla.Robinson and others, 1992). Nevertheless, the characteristics of Arctic precipitation and snowfall are poorly known. Over the Arctic Ocean (Fig. 1) direct information is largely limited to field measurements of snow depth (e.g. Reference RomanovRomanov, 1993). Although records are available for coastal, island and inland stations (Reference VoseVose and others, 1992). the tendency for collection gauges to “catch” only a fraction of snow in areas where wind-driven snow is common results in a bias towards low precipitation amounts (Reference Woo, Heron, Marsh and Steer.Woo and others, 1983). As most Arctic stations are at low altitude, the tendency for precipitation to increase with elevation probably also results in an underestimate of regional averages. These problems are reviewed by Reference Groisman, Koknaeva, Belokrylova and KarlGroisman and others (1991).

Fig. 1. Location map showing the rawinsonde station used in the analysis (Stars). Results from several approximately co-located stations have been combined to provide complete records (see text). The 70°N circle is shown in bold.

Recently, we have begun to address some of these concerns through providing areal estimates of precipitation minus evaporation (PE) via the water-vapor flux convergence approach (Reference Alestalo, Street-Perrott, Beran and RatcliffeAlestalo, 1983), using an extensive rawinsonde archive. P – E represents the net freshening or salination of the ocean through surface exchanges with the atmosphere, and the net gain or loss of water by the land surface through exchanges with the atmosphere. Reference Serreze, Barry and WalshSerreze and others (in press) used rawinsonde data for 1974–91 to determine climatological P – E for the region north of 70°N. P – E is positive in all months, peaking in September. The annual value of 16.3 cm is 36% higher than the estimate of Reference Peixoto and OortPeixoto and Oort (1992) based on earlier data. In a subsequent study, Reference Walsh, Zhou., Portis and SerrezeWalsh and others (1994) examined inter-annual variations in P – E for a smaller central Arctic Ocean domain and the Mackenzie River basin.

Here, we extend these studies and use published climatological estimates of E to obtain P as a residual over the region north of 70°N for each month and year from 1974 to 1991. Using a linear temperature adjustment (Reference Ross and WalshRoss and Walsh, 1987), we then estimate the fraction of P represented by snow (S), with inter-annual variations in P and S diagnosed m terms of circulation. Comparisons are made with precipitation values redigitized for the same domain from the Reference GorshkovGorshkov (1983) atlas, based on Soviet data up to 1980; the Reference Maykut and Untersteiner.Maykut and Untersteiner (1971) snowfall climatology; and the April snow-depth maps provided by Reference RomanovRomanov (1993), based on Russian expeditions and field programs in the 1970s and 1980s. The choice of the 70°X circle for the P – E computations reflects the relatively dense station network near this latitude (Fig. 1), as well as the desire for consistency with previous work. Objective analyses produced by numerical weather centers may eventually be able to provide accurate Arctic precipitation data sets (Reference ChahineChahine, 1992), and planned “reanalysis” projects will allow the fields to be used more effectively in vapor-flux computations. Nevertheless, at present, analysis of rawinsonde data is still the best approach for assessing atmospheric hydrological variations.

2. Data and Techniques

a. Rawinsonde archive

Our primary data base is the historical Arctic rawinsonde archive (HARA) (Reference Kahl, Serreze, Shiotani, Skony and SchnellKahl and others. 1992). which contains all available soundings for fixed stations north of 65°N through 1991. Soundings typically extend to at least 300 mbar and contain reports at fixed mandatory-pressure levels (e.g. surface. 850 and 500 mbar) and significant levels (irregular pressure levels reported on the basis of conventional vertical-change criteria). Unfortunately, the number of significant levels reported for Eurasian stations is reduced prior to 1974. As the lack of significant levels may degrade the accuracy of the moisture calculations, we use data for the 1974–91 period only, at both 0000 and 1200 UTC.

b. Estimation of P – E

Quality control and data reduction follow Reference Serreze, Barry and WalshSerreze and others (in press). In that study, for each station and year represented in the HARA. monthly means were compiled of the vertically integrated specific humidity (Q, usually termed precipitable water) and meridional vapor flux (F) from the surface to 300 mbar, above which we assume water vapor to be negligible. The mean station fluxes were then passed into a Reference CressmanCressman (1959) analysis to interpolate the data to 70°N at every 10° of longitude. The vapor-flux convergence for each month was determined as

(1)

where F L. is the interpolated flux at a given longitude, dC is the length along the 70°N latitude circle (totaling 1.37 × 106 km2). and A is the area enclosed (15.4 × 106 km2). Following Reference Alestalo, Street-Perrott, Beran and RatcliffeAlestalo (1983), the flux convergence was then used to estimate monthly P – E for the region north of 70°N as

(2)

where ∂Q/∂t is the monthly rate of change of precipitable water in the domain. This approach ignores the contribution of condensed water (as either ice crystals or droplets), which, especially for the Arctic, should be negligible.

Reference Serreze, Box, Barry and WalshSerreze and others (1994) ignored changes in the distribution of stations; any individual station mean was passed into the interpolation procedure, provided that it was represented by a required minimum number of cases. Results for the 18 years (1974–91) were then averaged. Reference Walsh, Zhou., Portis and SerrezeWalsh and others (1994) find that minor changes in the station network have little impact on analysis of inter-annual variations in P – E. Nevertheless, to provide a homogeneous data base, we first examined the monthly means for each station and year. If these failed to pass the threshold requirement for the number of cases, they were treated as missing, with new monthly means then found by Cressman interpolation from surrounding station means. This resulted in complete time series for all stations. P – E was then determined using monthly means only from those stations requiring interpolation from surrounding stations for less than 30 of the possible 216 months in the 18 year data record (13.8%). Following Reference Serreze, Barry and WalshSerreze and others (in press), ∂Q/∂t for each month (m) was found from the difference in Q averaged over month (m) and (m + 1), minus the average over month (m) and (m − 1), using only those stations north of 70°N. The final network of 47 selected stations is shown in Figure 1. Partial records for several nearly co-located stations have been combined.

c. Estimation of precipitation and snowfall

The Reference KorzunKorzun (1977) atlas contains climatological monthly estimates of E for different regions of the Arctic, based on coastal and drifting stations. Using these data, climatological monthly E was obtained for the region north of 70°N. The monthly totals, which range from 0.30 cm in January to 2.05 cm in October (with an annual total of 10.3 cm), were then substituted into the P – E estimates to obtain P for each month and year. P is hence only solved in terms of a climatological seasonal cycle in E; our resulting P values will still contain some unresolved component of E related to its inter-annual variability. If direct measurements of P and E revealed that the two variables are negatively (positively) correlated, substitution of climatological E into our P – E values would act to overestimate (underestimate) the true inter-annual variability in P. Although an inverse relationship seems more likely (i.e., with high P one might expect a smaller vapor gradient, leading to a reduction in E), the strong additional dependence of E on the gradient in wind speed makes this difficult to assess. Although it may have been possible to use the rawinsonde network to provide time series of E, we made no attempt to do so here.

Following Reference Ross and WalshRoss and Walsh (1987), the fraction of precipitation falling as snow was assumed to vary linearly front 100% for an air temperature < −5°C to 0% for 3°C. The temperature (T) data consisted of the aggregate monthly means for each year of the lowest reported temperature level in the soundings, using all stations north of 70°N. Clearly, this approach also has limitations. Although during the cold season it is reasonable to expect nearly all precipitation over the Arctic basin to fall as snow, the inland and coastal distribution of the stations may result in basin-wide temperatures being somewhat overestimated, potentially leading to underestimates of snowfall during summer and the transition months. Furthermore, as the temperature on “precipitation days” during summer is likely to be lower than the mean monthly temperature, this will also act to underestimate snow fall. It should be clear that we are providing first-order estimates of P and S.

3. Results

a. Long-term means

Averaged over the 18 years, annual P – E, P and S, all expressed in terms of water equivalent (w.e.), averaged over the 70–90°N region, are 16.3, 26.6 and 19.0 cm, respectively. The P – E estimate is identical to that of Reference Serreze, Barry and WalshSerreze and others (in press). By comparison, annual P from the Reference GorshkovGorshkov (1983) atlas is slightly higher at 29.3 cm. Using the same mean snowpack density of 330 kg m−3 employed by Reference Maykut and Untersteiner.Maykut and Untersteiner (1971), which accounts for settling and aging of the accumulated snowpack (typical fresh snowfall densities are 70–165 kg m−3; see Reference Goodison and MetcalfeGoodison and Metcalfe, 1981), the w.e. snowfall equates to an accumulated snow depth of 57.9 cm. The Reference Maykut and Untersteiner.Maykut and Untersteiner (1971) climatology, which is used as the basis for snow-cover input in most current sea-ice models, has an accumulated annual snow depth of 40.0 cm. As that estimate is representative of the sea-ice-covered regions of the Arctic, and ours includes oceanic regions over the Atlantic side of the Arctic where precipitation appears to be comparatively high (Reference GorshkovGorshkov, 1983), this difference is not surprising.

Figure 2 provides the seasonal cycles in P, S and T. From October through May, P and S are identical. reflecting the mean temperatures < −5°C. By contrast. essentially all precipitation falls as rain during July and August. Both variables show a September November maximum. Monthly precipitation from the Reference GorshkovGorshkov (1983) atlas is 2.0 cm in January, 1.6 cm in April, 3.8 cm in August and 2.0 cm in December. Gorshkov’s values are hence somewhat higher during winter months with a somewhat lower maximum occurring earlier in the year, Reference Maykut and Untersteiner.Maykut and Untersteiner (1971) show a late August October snowfall maximum. Their maximum monthly snowfall w.e. of 4.3 cm is reasonably close to our October maximum of 3.8 cm. Reference RomanovRomanov’s (1993) average central Arctic snow depth of 20 cm for April is only one-third of the density-adjusted accumulated September–April snowfall from Figure 2. Again, given our larger domain, this is not surprising.

Fig. 2. Seasonal cycle of mean aerologically derived precipitation (cm), snowfall (cm w.e.) and temperature (°C).

b. Inter-annual variations

Figures 3 and 4 display the time series of P and 5 as bat-plots. for each year, the total length of the bar represents the annual total, while from bottom to top the individual bar segments represent the contributions from winter (January–March), spring (April–June), summer (July–September) and autumn (October–December). These definitions facilitate evaluation of seasonal contributions of P and S to totals for standard calendar years. For annual totals, P ranges by 7.8 cm from 22.8 cm in 1978 to 30.6 cm in 1981, with a nearly equally high value in 1989 (30.3 cm). The corresponding extremes of P – E are 12.5 (1978) and 20.3 cm (1981). Hence, inter-annual variability in P, while substantial, is not outstandingly large, as is evident from the fairly small coefficient of deviation (the standard deviation divided by the mean) of 0.11. There is some suggestion of a multi-year cycle in P, with higher values in the mid-1970s and the early and late 1980s, which needs to be tested with a longer record.

Fig. 3. Annual and seasonal time series of aerologically derived precipitation (cm). From bottom to top, the individual bar segments for each rear represent winter, spring, summer and autumn, respectively. The long-term seasonal means are: winter (4.1 cm); spring (5.4 cm); summer (8.8 cm); autumn (8.3 cm).

Fig. 4. Annual and seasonal time series of aerologically derived snowfall (cm w.e.). From bottom to top, the individual bar segments far each year represent winter, spring, summer and autumn, respectively. The long-term seasonal means are: winter (4.1 cm); spring (3.9 cm); summer (2.6 cm); autumn (8.3 cm).

P for winter, spring and summer is more variable, with coefficients of deviation of 0.14, 0.17 and 0.16, respectively, as compared to 0.08 for autumn. While we reiterate that our reconstructed P values will contain some error due to the use of climatological E, ranking the results for each season reveals that the fairly modest variability in annual P results from a tendency in many years for a relatively large P in one season to be offset by relatively small P in another. For example, while the high P in spring 1977 (6.9 cm. second highest) acted to offset low P in winter (2.9 cm, lowest), the large value in the autumn of 1991 (9.2 cm, second highest) was similarly offset by a small P in winter (3.5 cm, third lowest). On this basis, 1981 and 1989 are unusual in that each year was represented by P which for three seasons ranked among the five highest. By contrast, 1978 is unusual in showing small P for three seasons. Turning to snowfall w.e., 1986 has the highest annual total (21.0 cm) and 1990 the lowest (17.4 cm). The variability in annual snowfall is less than for precipitation, as is evident by the smaller coefficient of deviation (0.09), but is again larger for individual seasons, especially for summer (0.25).

c. Circulation controls

To place precipitation variations in the context of atmospheric circulation, we identified for each season the three years with the highest and lowest P. Composite means of 500 mbar height were then constructed for each three-season sub-set, using twice-daily U.S. National Meteorological Outer (NMC) data in the octagonal grid format. Figure 5 shows fields of the high-precipitation composite and the high- minus low-precipitation composite difference for winter. The most notable feature is the large negative composite differences extending from south of Iceland into the central Arctic Ocean (i.e. lower heights for the high composite), maximized near the North Pole and Iceland. Results for the other seasons (not shown) are qualitatively similar, but with the negative differences for spring not extending to Iceland. As the high and low composite fields for all seasons exhibit essentially opposing anomaly patterns, the difference fields are not dominated by anomalies in one composite or the other. Results using 850 mbar height and sea-level pressure (SLP) are similar.

Fig. 5. Winter mean 500 mbar geopotential height field (m) for the high-precipitation composite (solid contours) and the high minus low composite height difference (dashed-dot and dotted contours for negative and positive differences, respectively). Positive differences mean higher 500 mbar heights for the high-precipitation composite.

The long-term (1974–91) mean winter 500 mbar pattern is dominated by a pronounced trough extending from south of Greenland into Baffin Bay (the northern extension of the eastern North American trough), an intervening weak ridge over northern Europe, a strong trough over Eurasia (the northern extension of the East Asian trough), and a strong ridge over western Canada and Alaska (the northern extension of the western North American ridge). The summer mean also contains these features, but with a weaker and more zonal circulation. In showing stronger troughs over the Atlantic and Eurasian sectors for the high composites, Figure 5 suggests that high winter P is favored by amplification of the climatological circulation pattern and, from the similarity of the composite differences, a more “winter-type” circulation in the other seasons, and vice versa for low P. Snowfall extremes for winter and autumn occur for the same years as the precipitation extremes, but this is not true of spring and summer, reflecting the temperature effect. For example, while summer precipitation in 1986 was the lowest of the 18 years (6.5 cm), the season actually had the fourth highest snowfall total (3.1 cm w.e.) due to low summer temperatures.

In terms of associated synoptic activity, Reference Serreze, Box, Barry and WalshSerreze and others (1993) show that winter cyclonic activity exhibits a broad frequency maximum extending from Iceland into the Kara Sea. This is a reflection of the primary North Atlantic cyclone track, which represents the combined population of systems migrating poleward from lower latitudes, as well as those generated or rejuvenated within the Arctic itself. Climatologically, the existence of the track is in accord with the position of the eastern North American trough. Cyclones also frequently track into Baffin Bay and Davis Strait, resulting in another cyclone-frequency maximum in this region. Figure 6 shows the winter high-precipitation minus low-precipitation composite difference held of counts of sea-level cyclone centers at NMC grid points, obtained by applying an automated cyclone-detection algorithm (Reference Serreze, Barry and WalshSerreze and others, 1993) to twice-daily NMC SLP fields. The raw grid counts have been weighted to emphasize the cyclones with lower central SLP, which (as a general rule) are more intense. The weighting factor is 1.50 for central pressures 980 mbar, 1.25 for those from 980 to 990 mbar, 1.12 for those from 990 to 1000 mbar, and 1.00 for those > 1000 mbar. As the area represented by an NMC grid increases with latitude, the counts have been normalized with respect to the 381 km × 381 km grid area at 60°N.

Fig. 6. Winter high-precipitation minus low-precipitation composite difference field of the numbers of sea-level cyclone centers weighted by central pressure (dotted contours, positive differences; dashed contours, negative differences; contour interval = 5). Positive differences mean more cyclones for the high-precipitation composite.

Anomaly patterns of weighted cyclone distributions for the high and low seasonal precipitation composites with respect to the 18 year means lend to be in opposition. The results in Figure 6 consequently indicate that, for winter. high P and S are associated with more frequent cyclonic activity over the Atlantic side of the Arctic, particularly south of Iceland, in the Norwegian Sea, north of the Laptev Sea and Davis Strait. Arguing for a stronger North Atlantic cyclone track, this again represents amplification of the normal winter pattern (Reference Serreze, Box, Barry and WalshSerreze and others, 1993). The spring and autumn composite difference patterns are qualitatively similar to winter. By contrast, while the summer high-precipitation composite shows modest increases of cyclonic activity over the Arctic Ocean, it is also characterized by a strong decrease over Eurasia and Canada. Typically, large increases in summer cyclone activity are found over these regions.

The conclusion that increased P (and hence P – E) is associated with increased storm activity is not surprising. Recall, however, that variations in P as examined here result from variations in the vapor-flux convergence (Equation (1)). Reference Serreze, Barry and WalshSerreze and others (in press) show that the mean flux convergence, which is positive in all months, is most strongly driven by large poleward transient eddy vapor transports near the prime meridian, consistent with cyclonic activity along the North Atlantic track. The only region with mean equatorward transports at 70°N is the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, related to persistent northerly winds extending from the surface to at least 500 mbar, as can be inferred from the orientation of the height contours shown in Figure 5.

To place our results in this context, it is hence useful to examine changes in the patterns of the meridional vapor flux across 70°N Figure 7 shows, for winter at every 10° longitude, the high-precipitation minus low-precipitation composite difference of the meridional flux as well as the high and low composite fluxes, expressed as anomalies with respect to the 18 year means. High winter P is associated with positive composite differences peaking at about 10” and 180°E. While this in part reflects mean southerly winds (as inferred from the high composite geopotential-height contours at 500 mbar and lower levels), implying a poleward lime-mean flux, at least near the prime meridian, the results are also consistent with strong transient eddy transports associated with increased cyclonic activity. Negative differences are found from about 30° to 120° W, over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and Baffin Bay. For both composites, the fluxes over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago are negative, indicating that the high composites are actually associated with greater outflow from this region. Although the composite differences are negative in some areas, these are outweighed by the positive differences, resulting in a larger flux convergence for the high composites. Results for the remaining seasons (not shown) display different patterns, but share the common feature of above-average poleward fluxes over the Atlantic and Eurasian sectors of the Arctic.

Fig. 7. Winter high minus low composite difference of the vertically integrated meridional water-vapor flux at 70°N, with the corresponding high and low composites expressed as anomalies with respect to the 18 year record. Units are kg m−1 s−1.

5. Conclusions

Under the meridional atmospheric circulation patterns identified here, P increases with respect to the long-term (1974–91) mean by 20%, 26%, 21% and 12% for winter, spring, summer and autumn, respectively. These changes also bold for winter and autumn snowfall. Of course, these results are only valid for the study domain north of 70°N. Although our analysis provides only basin-wide averages, Reference GorshkovGorshkov’s (1983) maps do show a distinct precipitation maximum between Greenland and Scandinavia, along the North Atlantic cyclone track. It hence seems reasonable to infer that increases in P and S associated with the more meridional circulation would be most pronounced in this area. The greater issue of whether these “favorable” meridional circulation types will be more or less frequent under altered climatic states such as enhanced greenhouse warming remains to be addressed. Reference Bromwich, Tzeng and ParishBromwich and others (1994) have assessed the ability of the NCAR CCM1 to simulate present-day aspects of the Arctic circulation and hydrologic budget, and have found some large discrepancies from observations, A major problem is that the model under-represents storm activity along the North Atlantic track. Improving the simulation of this feature would appear to be a prerequisite for assessing the possible response of Arctic precipitation and snowfall to climate change.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NSF grants DPP-9214838, DPP-9113673 and ATM-9315351. We thank the National Snow and Ice Data Center staff for computer support.

References

Referrences

Aagaard, K. and Carmack, E.C. 1989. The role of sea ice and other fresh waters in the Arctic circulation. J. Geophys. Res., 94(C10), 14,48514,498.Google Scholar
Alestalo, M. 1983. The atmospheric water budget over Europe. In Street-Perrott, F.A., Beran, M. and Ratcliffe, R.A.S. eds. Variations in the global water budget. Dordrecht, etc., D. Reidel Publishing Co, 6779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromwich, D.H., Tzeng, R.Y. and Parish, T.R. 1994. Simulation of the modern Arctic climate by the NCAR CCM1. J. Climate. 7(7), 10501069.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahine, M.T. 1992. GEWEX: the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment. EOS, 73(2), 913914.Google Scholar
Cressman, G.P. 1959. An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Weather Rev., 87, 367374.Google Scholar
Goodison, B.E. and Metcalfe, J.R. 1981. An experiment to measure fresh snowfall water equivalent at Canadian climate stations. Eastern Snow Conference. Proceedings of the 1981 Annual Meeting, 110112.Google Scholar
Gorshkov, S.G., ed. 1983. World ocean atlas, Vol. 3: Arctic Ocean. Oxford, etc., Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Groisman, P.Y., Koknaeva, V. V., Belokrylova, T.A. and Karl, T.R. 1991. Overcoming biases of precipitation: a history of the USSR experience. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Sac., 72, 17251733.Google Scholar
Kahl, J.D., Serreze, M.C. Shiotani, S., Skony, S.M. and Schnell, R.C. 1992. In situ meteorological sounding archives for Arctic studies. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 73(11), 18241830.Google Scholar
Korzun, V.I. 1977. Atlas miroroi vodnoi bolans [Atlas of world water balance]. Leningrad, Gidrometeiozdat.Google Scholar
Maykut, G.A. and Untersteiner., N. 1971. Some results from a time-dependent thermodynamic model of sea ice. J. Geophys. Res., 76(6), 15501575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peixoto, J.P. and Oort, A.M. 1992. Physics of climate. New York, American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Robinson, D.A., Serreze, M.C., Barry, R. G., Scharfen, G. and Kukla., G. 1992. Large-scale patterns and variability of snowmelt and parameterized surface albedo in the Arctic Basin. J. Climate., 5(10), 11091119.Google Scholar
Romanov, I.P. 1993. Atlas. Morphometric characteristics of ice and snow in the Arctic Basin, St. Petersburg, privately published.Google Scholar
Ross, B. and Walsh, J.E. 1987. A comparison of simulated and observed fluctuations in summertime Arctic surface albedo. J. Geophys. Res., 92(12), 13,11513,125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serreze, M.C., Box, J.E. Barry, R.G. and Walsh, J.E. 1993. Characteristics of Arctic synoptic activity, 1952–1989. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 51, 147164.Google Scholar
Serreze, M.C., Barry, R.G. and Walsh, J.E. In press. Atmospheric water vapor characteristics at 70°N. J. Climate.Google Scholar
Vose, R.S. and 6 others. 1992. The global historical climatology network: long-term monthly temperature. precipitation, sea level pressure, and station pressure data. Oak Ridge, TN, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Environmental Sciences Division. (Publication 3912.)Google Scholar
Walsh, J.E., Zhou., X. Portis, D. and Serreze, M.C. 1994. Atmospheric contribution to hydrologic variations in the Arctic. Atmosphere–Ocean, 32(4), 733755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, M. -k., Heron, R., Marsh, P. and Steer., P. 1983, Comparison of weather station snowfall with winter snow accumulation in high Arctic basins. Atmosphere–Ocean, 21(3), 312325.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location map showing the rawinsonde station used in the analysis (Stars). Results from several approximately co-located stations have been combined to provide complete records (see text). The 70°N circle is shown in bold.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Seasonal cycle of mean aerologically derived precipitation (cm), snowfall (cm w.e.) and temperature (°C).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Annual and seasonal time series of aerologically derived precipitation (cm). From bottom to top, the individual bar segments for each rear represent winter, spring, summer and autumn, respectively. The long-term seasonal means are: winter (4.1 cm); spring (5.4 cm); summer (8.8 cm); autumn (8.3 cm).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Annual and seasonal time series of aerologically derived snowfall (cm w.e.). From bottom to top, the individual bar segments far each year represent winter, spring, summer and autumn, respectively. The long-term seasonal means are: winter (4.1 cm); spring (3.9 cm); summer (2.6 cm); autumn (8.3 cm).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Winter mean 500 mbar geopotential height field (m) for the high-precipitation composite (solid contours) and the high minus low composite height difference (dashed-dot and dotted contours for negative and positive differences, respectively). Positive differences mean higher 500 mbar heights for the high-precipitation composite.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Winter high-precipitation minus low-precipitation composite difference field of the numbers of sea-level cyclone centers weighted by central pressure (dotted contours, positive differences; dashed contours, negative differences; contour interval = 5). Positive differences mean more cyclones for the high-precipitation composite.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Winter high minus low composite difference of the vertically integrated meridional water-vapor flux at 70°N, with the corresponding high and low composites expressed as anomalies with respect to the 18 year record. Units are kg m−1 s−1.