Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:18:37.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

USE of In-Cage Shelters by Laboratory Rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

P Townsend
P Townsend*
Affiliation:
Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of providing a shelter to single-housed rats was measured in terms of the preference shown for a cage containing a shelter compared with a barren cage, the range of behaviours performed and the apparent fearfulness of the animals. All animals showed a strong preference for cages containing a shelter and rats housed in this environment showed increased exploratory behaviour and were apparently less fearful, based on their willingness to leave the home-cage. It would seem appropriate to provide enclosed shelters within the cages of laboratory rats as a way of improving their environment.

Keywords

animal welfareenrichmenthousingratsshelters
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 1997 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Altmann, J 1974 Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267Google ScholarPubMed
Anzaldo, A J, Harrison, P C, Riskowski, G L, Sebek, L A, Maghirang, R G, Stricklin, W R and Gonyou, H W 1994 Increasing welfare of laboratory rats with the help of spatially enhanced cages. Animal Welfare Information Centre Newsletter 5(3): 1–5Google Scholar
Batchelor, G R 1994 The rest/activity rhythm of the laboratory rat housed under different systems. Animal Technology 45: 181–187Google Scholar
Boyd, J 1988 Enrichment surprises with mice. Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation 3: 98–99Google Scholar
Brain, P F 1995 Rodents. In: O’Donoghue, P N (ed) International Workshop on the Accommodation of Laboratory Animals in Accordance with Animal Welfare Requirements, Berlin 17-19 May 1993 pp 1–14. Bundersministerium fur Erahrung, Landwirtschat und Forster: Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care 1984 Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals: 2. Canadian Council on Animal Care: Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Chamove, A S 1989 Cage design reduces emotionality in mice. Laboratory Animals 23: 215–219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe 1986 European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1983 Battery hens name their price: consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological needs. Animal Behaviour 31: 1195–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, M S 1975 The rat’s long-term preference for complexity in its environment. Animal Learning and Behaviour 3: 245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I J H 1978 The interpretation of preference tests in animal behaviour. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FELASA Working Group on Animal Health 1994 Recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit breeding colonies. Laboratory Animals 28: 1–12Google Scholar
Grant, E C and Mackintosh, J H 1963 A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents. Behaviour 21: 246–259Google Scholar
Home Office 1995 Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals in Designated Breeding and Supplying Establishments. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, M 1984 Behavioural approaches to rodent management. In: Standards in Laboratory Animal Management. Proceedings of a LASA/UFAW Symposium pp 40–49. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Potters Bar, UKGoogle Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services 1985 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, USAGoogle Scholar
Ward, G E and DeMille, D 1991 Environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Animal Technology 42: 149–156Google Scholar