Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:51:29.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors associated with in-transit losses of fattening pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

CE Dewey ,
C Haley ,
T Widowski ,
Z Poljak  and
RM Friendship
CE Dewey*
Affiliation:
Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
C Haley
Affiliation:
Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
T Widowski
Affiliation:
Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
Z Poljak
Affiliation:
Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
RM Friendship
Affiliation:
Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In-transit losses (ITL) in fattening pigs refers to mortality occurring after having left the farm but prior to stunning at the abattoir. The purpose of this observational study was to identify the associations between environmental and truck temperatures, distances travelled, feed withdrawal, farm, transport company and abattoir and in-transit losses of fattening pigs marketed in Ontario, Canada from 2001 to 2004. A prospective study of 104 trips was conducted to determine temperatures inside the truck and identify the factors associated with this. In 2001, ITL was 0.017%, with 75% of producers losing < 5 pigs annually. In-transit losses increased between distances travelled of 590 to 720 km and decreased at distances greater than 980 km. The Pig Comfort Index, a combination of temperature and humidity, was used to identify thresholds of environmental conditions above which in-transit losses increased. The farm at which the pig was raised explained more variation of ITL (25%) than transport company (8%) or abattoir (16%). The within-farm ITL in 2003 had a positive association with those in 2001 and 2002. Withdrawing food prior to transport may decrease ITL on some farms. The temperature in truck compartments holding pigs increased by 0.99°C as the environmental temperature increased by 1°C and by 0.1°C as the relative humidity increased by 1%. Truck temperature decreased 0.06°C for each increase in driving speed of 10 km h−1 and increased by 7°C with an increase in pig density from one to 2.6 pigs per m2.

Keywords

animal welfareepidemiologyin-transit lossmortalitypigtransport
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 18 , Issue 4: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , November 2009 , pp. 355 - 361
Copyright
© 2009 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Abbott, TA, Guise, HJ, Hunter, EJ, Penny, RHC and Easby, C 1995 Factors influencing pig deaths during transit: An analysis of driver's reports. Animal Welfare 4: 29–40Google Scholar
Allen, WM, Hebert, CN and Smith, LP 1974 Deaths during and after transport of pigs in Great Britain. The Veterinary Record 94: 212–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, VE, O’Connell, NE, Kilpatrick, DJ and Moss, BW 2000 Influence of environmental enrichment on welfare-related behavioural and physiological parameters in growing pigs. Animal Science 70: 443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, RH, Parrott, RF, Goode, JA, Lloyd, DM, Rodway, RG and Broom, DM 1996 Behavioural and hormonal responses of pigs during transport: Effect of mixing and duration of journey. Animal Science 62: 547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, EG 1979 Necropsy survey of transport stress deaths in Saskatchewan market weight hogs. Proceedings of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnostics pp 53–60Google Scholar
Curtis, SE 1983 Environmental Management in Animal Agriculture, First Edition. Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USAGoogle Scholar
de Jong, IC, Prelle, IT and van de Burgwal, JA 2000 Effects of rearing conditions on behavioural and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter handling and mixing at transport. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80: 451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohoo, I, Martin, SW and Stryhn, H 2003 Veterinary Epidemiologic Research, First Edition pp 317–334. AVC Inc: Charlottetown, USAGoogle Scholar
Geers, R, Bleus, E and Van Schie, T 1994 Transport of pigs different with respect to the halothane gene: stress assessment. Journal of Animal Science 72: 2552–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guise, HJ and Penny, RH 1989 Factors influencing the welfare and carcass and meat quality of pigs. 1. The effects of stocking density in transport and the use of electric goads. Animal Production 49(3): 511–515Google Scholar
Haley, C, Dewey, CE, Widowski, T and Friendship, RM 2008a Factors associated with in-transit losses of market hogs in Ontario in 2001. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 72(5): 377–384Google Scholar
Haley, C, Dewey, CE, Widowski, T and Friendship, RM 2008b Association between in-transit loss, internal trailer temperature, and distance traveled by Ontario market hogs Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 72(5): 385–389Google Scholar
Hunter, EJ, Weeding, CM, Guise, HJ, Abbott, TA and Penny, RHC 1994 The effect of season and stocking density on pig welfare during transport. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 41: 274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooy, E 1983 Watering pigs during road transport through Europe. Fleischwirtsch 63: 1456–1458Google Scholar
Lambooy, E 1988 Road transport of pigs over a long distance: Some aspects of behaviour, temperature and humidity during transport and some effects of the last two factors. Animal Production 46: 257–263Google Scholar
Lambooy, E and Engel, B 1991 Transport of slaughter pigs by truck over a long distance: some aspects of loading density and ventilation. Livestock Production Science 28: 163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooij, E and van Putten, G 1993 Transport of pigs. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport, First Edition pp 213–231. CAB International: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Randall, JM 1993 Environmental parameters necessary to define comfort for pigs, cattle and sheep in livestock transporters. Animal Production 57: 299–307Google Scholar
Randall, JM and Patel, R 1994 Thermally induced ventilation of livestock transporters. Journal of Agriculture, English Research 57: 99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riches, H, Guise, J and Penny, R 1996 Preliminary investigation of frequency of vomiting by pigs in transport. The Veterinary Record 139(17): 428Google ScholarPubMed
Roller, WL and Goldman, RF 1969 Response of swine to acute heat exposure. Trans ASAE 12: 164–174Google Scholar
Schrama, JW, van der Hel, W, Gorssen, J, Henken, AM, Verstegen, MW and Noordhuizen, JP 1996 Required thermal thresholds during transport of animals Vet Q 18: 90–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, LP and Allen, WM 1976 A study of the weather conditions related to the death of pigs during and after their transportation in England. Agricultural Meteor 16: 115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Logtestijn, JG, Romme, AMTC and Eikelenboom, G 1981 Losses caused by transport of slaughter pigs in the Netherlands. Transport of Animals Intended for Breeding, Production and Slaughter 18: 105–114Google Scholar
Walter, SD, Feinstein, AR and Wells, C 1987 Coding ordinal independent variables in multiple regression analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 987 125(2): 319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, PD, Bevis, EA, Edwards, JE, Brown, SN and Knowles, TG 1991 Effect of the angle of slope on the ease with which pigs negotiate loading ramps. The Veterinary Record 128: 419–421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD 1998a Choosing appropriate space allowances for slaughter pigs transported by road: a review. The Veterinary Record 142: 449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, PD 1998b The welfare of slaughter pigs during transport. Animal Welfare 7: 365–381Google Scholar
Whiting, TL and Brandt, S 2002 Minimum space allowance for transportation of swine by road. Canadian Veterinary Journal 43: 207–212Google Scholar
Zanella, AJ and Duran, O 2001 Pig welfare during loading and transportation: a North American perspective. Proceedings of the 1st International Virtual Conference on Pork Quality: Welfare, Transport, Slaughter and Consumers pp 12. 16th November 2000, Concordia, BrazilGoogle Scholar