Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:17:11.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) kept in four different cage sizes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

K Fischer ,
SG Gebhardt-Henrich  and
A Steiger
K Fischer
Affiliation:
Fasanenstrasse 22, CH-4402 Frenkendorf, Switzerland
SG Gebhardt-Henrich*
Affiliation:
Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Bern, Division of Animal Housing and Welfare, PO Box Ch-3001, Bern, Switzerland
A Steiger
Affiliation:
Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Bern, Division of Animal Housing and Welfare, PO Box Ch-3001, Bern, Switzerland
*
* Contact for correspondence and request for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cages for laboratory and pet hamsters are usually small. Using video recordings, the behaviour of sixty female golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), housed individually in four different cage sizes, was compared in order to draw conclusions about their welfare. The cage sizes were 1,800 cm2, 2,500 cm2, 5,000 cm2, and 10,000 cm2. Enrichment items and litter depth were standardised and all cages were equipped with a running-wheel (30 cm diameter). Stereotypic wire-gnawing, usage of the provided space, weight gain, and reactions to mild husbandry stressors were used as welfare indicators. Stereotypic wire-gnawing was observed in all cage sizes, but hamsters in small cages gnawed significantly longer and more frequently. There were no significant differences in running-wheel activity. In small cages hamsters made use of the roof of their wooden shelters as an additional platform more often than in big cages, which could suggest that they needed more space. Therefore, the welfare of pet golden hamsters in cages with a minimal ground floor area of 10,000 cm2 seemed to be enhanced compared with smaller cages.

Keywords

animal welfarecage sizegolden hamsterpet animalrunning-wheelwire-gnawing
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2007 , pp. 85 - 93
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Balcombe, JP, Barnard, ND and Sandusky, C 2004 Laboratory routines cause animal stress. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Sciences 43: 42–51Google ScholarPubMed
Bantin, GC and Sanders, PD 1989 Animal caging: Is big necessarily better? Animal Technology 40: 45–54Google Scholar
Buchanan, KL and Goldsmith, AR 2004 Noninvasive endocrine data for behavioural studies: the importance of validation. Animal Behaviour 67: 183–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, JF, Gebhardt-Henrich, SG, Fischer, K, Hauzenberger, AR and Steiger, A 2006 Hereditary hydrocephalus in laboratory-reared golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Journal of Veterinary Pathology 43: 523–529CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gattermann, R 2000 70 Jahre Goldhamster in menschlicher Obhut – wie gross sind die Unterschiede zu seinen wildlebenden Verwandten? Tierlaboratorium 23: 86–99. [Title translation: 70 years of husbandry of golden hamsters - how large are the differences from their wild relatives?]Google Scholar
Gattermann, R, Fitzsche, P, Neumann, K, Al-Hussein, I, Kayser, A, Abiad, M and Yakti, R 2001 Notes on the current distribution and the ecology of wild golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Journal of Zoology, London 254: 359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt-Henrich, SG, Fischer, K, Hauzenberger, AR, Keller, P and Steiger, A (submitted) Capture and restraint during anaesthesia/euthanasia may elevate glucocorticoid levels in male golden hamstersGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt-Henrich, SG, Vonlanthen, EM and Steiger, A 2005 How does the running wheel affect the behaviour and reproduction of golden hamsters kept as pets? Applied Animal Behaviour Sciences 95: 199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhnen, G 1999a The effect of cage size and enrichment on core temperature and febrile response of the golden hamster. Laboratory Animals 33: 221–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhnen, G 1999b The effect of housing conditions on the results of behavioural tests in golden hamster. Zoology 102 (II): 84Google Scholar
Lerch-Leemann, C 2002 Merkblatt Goldhamster. STS (Swiss animal protection, [SAP]): PO Box CH-4008, Basel, Switzerland. [Title translation: Information on golden hamsters]Google Scholar
Mason, GJ 1991 Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 1015 - 1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ and Mendl, M 1993 Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? Animal Welfare 2: 301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ and Latham, NR 2004 Can't stop, won't stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator? In: Kirkwood JK, Roberts EA and Vickery S (eds) Science in the Service of Animal Welfare pp S57-S69. UFAW: Wheathampstead, Herts, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrosovsky, N, Salmon, PA and Vrang, N 1998 Revolutionary Science: an improved running wheel for hamsters. Chronobiology International 15: 147–158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nevison, CM, Hurst, JL and Barnard, CJ 1999 Why do male ICR(CD-1) mice perform bar-related (stereotypic) behaviour? Behavioural Processes 47: 95–111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ödberg, FO 1987 The influence of cage size and environmental enrichment on the development of stereotypies in bank voles (Clethrimonys glareolus). Behavioural Processes 14: 155–173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reebs, SG and Maillet, D 2003 Effect of cage enrichment on daily use of running wheels by Syrian hamsters. Chronobiology International 20: 9–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J 1991 Problems associated with the interpretation of physiological data in the assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, CM 1998a Voluntary wheel running: a review and novel interpretation. Animal Behaviour 56: 11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, CM 1998b The use and perceived importance of three resources which provide caged laboratory mice the opportunity for extended locomotion. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 353–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, CM 2003 Social context affects the motivation of laboratory mice, Mus musculus, to gain access to resources. Animal Behaviour 66: 649–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, CM 2004 The motivation of group-housed laboratory mice, Mus musculus, for additional space. Animal Behaviour 67: 711–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, CM and Nicol, CJ 1997 Behavioural demand functions of caged laboratory mice for additional space. Animal Behaviour 53: 67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, P, Dupuis, R and Costentin, J 1994 Thigmotaxis as an index of anxiety in mice. Influence of dopaminergic transmissions. Behavioural Brain Research 61: 59–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sørensen, DB, Krohn, T, Hansen, HN, Ottesen, JL and Hansen, AK 2005 An ethological approach to housing requirements of golden hamsters, Mongolian gerbils and fat sand rats in the laboratory - A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spangenberg, EMF, Augustsson, H, Dahlborn, K and Essén-Gustavsson, B 2005 Housing-related activity in rats: effects on body weight, urinary corticosterone levels, muscle properties and performance. Laboratory Animals 39: 45–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syme, LA and Hughes, RN 1972 Social isolation in young rats: Effects of cage size on open-field behaviour. Psychoneurological Science 29: 25–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vonlanthen, EM 2003 Einflüsse der Laufradnutzung auf ausgewählte ethologische, morphologische und reproduktionsbiologische Parameter beim Syrischen Goldhamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Dissertation, Vetsuisse Faculty Bern, Switzerland. [Title translation: Influences of the running wheel on ethological, morphological and reproductive parameters of the Syrian golden hamster]: Influences of the running wheel on ethological, morphological and reproductive parameters of the Syrian golden hamster]Google Scholar
Waiblinger, E 1999 Welchen Einfluss haben die Zugabe von bearbeitbarem Nestmaterial und der Ort der Futterdarbietung auf das Gitternagen bei Mongolischen Rennmäusen (Meriones ungulatus) im Labor? Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemässen Tierhaltung pp 49–59. KTBL: Darmstadt, Germany. [Title translation: Do the presence of nesting material and the location of the food presentation have an effect on the development of bar-chewing in laboratory gerbils]: Do the presence of nesting material and the location of the food presentation have an effect on the development of bar-chewing in laboratory gerbils]Google Scholar
Wiedenmayer, C 1997 The early ontogeny of bar-gnawing in Laboratory gerbils. Animal Welfare 6: 273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Würbel, H 2001 Ideal homes? Housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour. Trends in Neuroscience 24: 207–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würbel, H and Stauffacher, M 1996 Prevention of Stereotypy in Laboratory Mice: Effects on Stress Physiology and Behaviour. Physiology & Behavior 59: 1163–1170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würbel, H and Stauffacher, M 1997 Age and weight at weaning affect corticosterone level and development of stereotypies in ICR-mice. Animal Behaviour 53: 891–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Würbel, H and Stauffacher, M 1998 Physical condition at weaning affects exploratory behaviour and stereotypy development in laboratory mice. Behavioural Processes 43: 61–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würbel, H, Stauffacher, M and von Holst, D 1996 Stereotypies in laboratory mice – Quantitative and Qualitative Description of the Ontogeny of “Wire-gnawing” and “jumping” in Zur: ICR and Zur: Icr nu. Ethology 102: 371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Würbel, H, Freire, R and Nicol, CJ 1998a Prevention of stereotypic wire-gnawing in laboratory mice: Effects on behaviour and implications for stereotypy as a coping response. Behavioural Processes 42: 61–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würbel, H, Chapman, R and Rutland, C 1998b Effect of feed and environmental enrichment on development of stereotypic wire-gnawing in laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 60: 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, R and Gattermann, R 1986 Der Einfluss von Haltung und Rang auf die Nebennierenaktivität männlicher Goldhamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 61: 74 -75. [Title translation: The influence of housing and rank on the activity of adrenal glands of males golden hamsters]Google Scholar