Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:26:55.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animals' emotions: studies in sheep using appraisal theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

I Veissier ,
A Boissy ,
L Désiré  and
L Greiveldinger
I Veissier*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
A Boissy
Affiliation:
INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
L Désiré
Affiliation:
INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
L Greiveldinger
Affiliation:
INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Animal welfare concerns stem from recognition of the fact that animals can experience emotions such as pain or joy. Nevertheless, discussion of animal emotions is often considered anthropomorphic, and there is a clear need to use explanatory frameworks to understand animals' emotions. We borrowed appraisal theories developed in cognitive psychology to study sheep emotions. Emotions are viewed as the result of how an individual evaluates a triggering situation, following a sequence of checks, including the relevance of the situation (its suddenness, familiarity, predictability, and intrinsic pleasantness), its implications for the individual (including consistency with the individual's expectations), the potential for control, and both internal and external standards. We assumed that if the outcome of checks has an impact on the animal's emotional responses, then animals do not only show emotional responses but also feel emotions. We showed that sheep use similar checks to those used by humans to evaluate their environment, ie suddenness, familiarity, predictability, consistency with expectations, and control. Furthermore, this evaluation affects their emotional responses (behavioural responses, such as startle, ear postures, and cardiac activity). It is concluded that sheep are able to experience emotions such as fear, anger, rage, despair, boredom, disgust and happiness because they use the same checks involved in such emotions as humans. For instance, despair is triggered by situations which are evaluated as sudden, unfamiliar, unpredictable, discrepant from expectations, and uncontrollable, whereas boredom results from an overly predictable environment, and all these checks have been found to affect emotional responses in sheep. These results have implications for animal welfare: although a completely invariable and totally predictable environment should be avoided to prevent boredom, sudden events should probably be minimised, the animals should be offered the possibility to control their environment, and care should be taken to ensure a degree of predictability concerning the various events.

Keywords

animal welfareappraisal theoriesear posturesemotionheart ratesheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 18 , Issue 4: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , November 2009 , pp. 347 - 354
Copyright
© 2009 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Adkin, AL, Quant, S, Maki, BE and McIlroy, WE 2006 Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions. Experimental Brain Research 172: 85–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anisman, H and Matheson, K 2005 Stress, depression, and anhedonia: caveats concerning animal models. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 29: 525–546CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armfield, JM 2006 Cognitive vulnerability: a model of the etiology of fear. Clinical Psychology Review 26: 746–768Google Scholar
Arnold, MB 1945 Psychological differentiation of emotional states. Psychological Reviews 52: 35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, L and Buchanan-Smith, HM 2007 Effects of predictability on the welfare of captive animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 223–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M 2008 Why “good welfare” isn't “good enough”: minding animals and increasing our compassionate footprint. ARBS Annual Review of Biomedical Sciences, Theme Topic on ‘Unraveling Animal Welfare’ 10: T1–T14Google Scholar
Bouissou, MF, Boissy, A, Le Neindre, P and Veissier, I 2001 The bovines among other bovids: social structure of wild bovines. In: Keeling, L and Gonyou, H (eds) Social Behavior in Farm Animals pp 113–145. CAB International: Oxon, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1987 Applications of neurobiological studies to farm animal welfare. In: Wiepkema, PR and Van Adrichem, PWM (eds) Biology of Stress in Farm Animals: An Integrative Approach pp 101–110. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, K, Andersson, J, Petrovic, P, Petersson, KM, Ohman, A and Ingvar, M 2006 Predictability modulates the affective and sensory-discriminative neural processing of pain. NeuroImage 32: 1804–1814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe 1976 European Convention for the Protection of Farm Animals Kept for Farming Purposes, No. 87 6 pp. European Treaty Series: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 2006 Quality of life, good welfare and the animal's point of view. Proceedings of the Quality of Life: the Heart of the Matter. UFAW: Wheathampstead, Herts, UKGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, FH, Ooms, M, Kuurman, WW, Maes, JHR and Spruijt, BM 2008 Are pigs sensitive to variability in food rewards? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114: 93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, FBM 1999 Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial: consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. Philosophical Topics 27: 255–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delplanque, S, Silvert, L, Hot, P and Sequeira, H 2005 Event-related P3a and P3b in response to unpredictable emotional stimuli. Biological Psychology 68: 107–120Google ScholarPubMed
Désiré, L, Boissy, A and Veissier, I 2002 Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behavioural Processes 60: 165–180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Désiré, L, Veissier, I, Després, G and Boissy, A 2004 On the way to assess emotions in animals: Do lamb evaluate an event through its suddenness, novelty or unpredictability? Journal of Comparative Psychology 118: 363–374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Désiré, L, Veissier, I, Després, G, Delval, E, Toporenko, G and Boissy, A 2006 Appraisal process in sheep: synergic effect of suddenness and novelty on cardiac and behavioural responses. Journal of Comparative Psychology 120: 280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Després, G, Boissy, A, Désiré, L, Le Neindre, P and Veissier, I 2003 Validation of the measure of sympatho-vagal effect in lambs through autonomic blockades and heart rate variability indexes. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2: 615–619Google Scholar
Duepjan, S, Schoen, PC, Puppe, B, Tuchscherer, A and Manteuffel, G 2008 Differential vocal responses to physical and mental stressors in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114: 105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, B, Petit, M and D'hour, P 1995 Choice of sheep and cattle between vegetative and reproductive cocksfoot pastures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, IJH 1993 Welfare is to do with what animals feel. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6: 8–14Google Scholar
Duncan, IJH 2006 The changing concept of animal sentience. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100: 11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erhard, HW, Fábrega, E, Stanworth, G and Elston, DA 2004 Assessing dominance in sheep in a competitive situation: level of motivation and test duration. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85: 277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, K, Tuchscherer, M, Kanitz, E, Puppe, B and Manteuffel, G 2006 Effects of attention and rewarded activity on immune parameters and wound healing in pigs. Physiology and Behavior 89: 448–456Google ScholarPubMed
Esslen, M, Pascual-Marqui, RD, Hell, D, Kochi, K and Lehmann, D 2004 Brain areas and time course of emotional processing. NeuroImage 21: 1189–1203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Union 1997 The Amsterdam treaty modifying the treaty on European Union, the treaties establishing the European communities, and certain related facts. Official Journal C340: 1–144Google Scholar
Fraser, D and Duncan, IJH 1998 ‘Pleasures’, pains’ and animal welfare: toward a natural history of affect. Animal Welfare 7: 383–396Google Scholar
Frijda, NH 1986 The Emotions 528 pp. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Grassé, PP 1977 Evolution of Living Organisms 480 pp. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Greiveldinger, L, Veissier, I and Boissy, A 2006 Predictability and expectations influence emotional responses in lambs. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Congress The Quality of Life: The Heart of the Matter. UFAW: Wheathampstead, Herts, UKGoogle Scholar
Greiveldinger, L, Veissier, I and Boissy, A 2007 Emotional experience in sheep: Predictability of a sudden event lowers subsequent emotional responses. Physiology & Behavior 92: 675–683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greiveldinger, L, Veissier, I and Boissy, A 2009 Behavioural and physiological responses of lambs to controllable vs. uncontrollable aversive events. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34: 805–814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harding, EA, Elizabeth, ES and Mendl, M 2004 Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state. Nature 427: 312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haskell, MJ, Coerse, NCA, Taylor, PAE and McCorquodale, C 2004 The effect of previous experience over control of access to food and light on the level of frustration-induced aggression in the domestic hen. Ethology 110: 501–513Google Scholar
Herskin, MS, Kristensen, A-M and Munksgaard, L 2004 Behavioural responses of dairy cows toward novel stimuli presented in the home environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89: 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, ME 1998 Mr. Darwin Misread Miss Peacock's Mind: A New Look at Mate Selection in Light of Lessons From Nature 248 pp. Nature Books: Goshen, IN, USAGoogle Scholar
Johannesson, T and Ladewig, J 2000 The effect of irregular feeding times on the behaviour and growth of dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 103–111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kappas, A 2006 Appraisals are direct, immediate, intuitive, and unwitting and some are reflective. Cognition and Emotion 20: 952–975Google Scholar
Lazarus, RS, Averill, JR and Opton, EM Jr 1970 Towards a Cognitive Theory of Emotion pp 207–232. Academic Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventhal, H and Scherer, K 1987 The relationship of emotion to cognition: a functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition and Emotion 1: 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D and Willingham, B 2009 Spontaneous facial expressions of emotion of congenitally and noncongenitally blind individuals. Journal of Personal Social Psychology 96: 1–10Google ScholarPubMed
Milde, AM, Arslan, G, Overmier, JB, Berstad, A and Murison, R 2005 An acute stressor enhances sensitivity to a chemical irritant and increases (51)Credta permeability of the colon in adult rats. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 40: 35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mineka, S and Kihlstrom, JF 1978 Unpredictable and uncontrollable events: A new perspective on experimental neurosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 87: 256–271Google ScholarPubMed
Nicol, CJ 1996 Farm animal cognition. Animal Science 62: 375–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippot, P, Baeyens, C, Douilliez, C and Francart, B 2004 Cognitive regulation of emotion. In: Philippot, P and Feldman, RS (eds) The Regulation of Emotion pp 73–100. Laurence Erlbaum Associates: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porges, SW 1995 Orienting in a defensive world: mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A polyvagal theory. Psychophysiology 32: 301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseman, IJ 1991 Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion 5: 161–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseman, IJ and Evdokas, A 2004 Appraisals cause experienced emotions: experimental evidence. Cognition and Emotion 18: 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J 1990 Use of aversion-learning techniques to measure distress in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, De Passillé, AM and Munskgaard, L 1999 Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 720–727Google ScholarPubMed
Sander, D, Grandjean, D and Scherer, KR 2005 A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion: emotion and brain. Neural Networks 18: 317–352Google Scholar
Scherer, KR 2001 Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In: Scherer, KR, Schorr, A and Johnstone, T (eds) Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research pp 92–120. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Smith, CA and Kirby, LD 2001 Towards delivering on the promise of appraisal theory. In: Scherer, KR, Schorr, A and Johnstone, T (eds) Appraisal Processes in Emotion pp 121–140. Oxford University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Tallet, C, Veissier, I and Boivin, X 2005 Human contact and feeding as rewards for the lamb's affinity to their stockperson. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 59–73Google Scholar
Tazi, A, Dantzer, R and Le Moal, M 1987 Prediction and control of food rewards modulate endogenous pain inhibitory systems. Behavioral Brain Research 23: 197–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terlouw, EMC, Lawrence, AB and Illius, AW 1991 Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereo-typies in sows. Animal Behavior 42: 981–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooijen, J 1984 Impoverished environments and welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12: 3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veissier, I and Boissy, A 2007 Stress and welfare: two complementary concepts that are intrinsically related to the animal's point of view. Physiology & Behaviour 92: 429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpato, GL, Gonçalves-de-Freitas, E and Fernandes-de-Castilho, M 2007 Insights into the concept of fish welfare. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 75: 165–171Google ScholarPubMed
Weiss, JM 1972 Psychological factors in stress and disease. Scientific American 226: 104–113Google ScholarPubMed
Wemelsfelder, F 1993 The concept of animal boredom and its relationship to stereotyped behaviour. In: Lawrence, AB and Rushen, J (eds) Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare pp 65–95. CAB International: Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
Wynne, CD 2004 The perils of anthropomorphism. Nature 428: 606Google ScholarPubMed
Zvolensky, MJ, Eifert, GH, Lejuez, CW, Hopko, DR and Forsyth, JP 2000 Assessing the perceived predictability of anxiety-related events: a report on the perceived predictability index. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 31: 201–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed