Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:32:39.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical stimulation of rumination in sheep by the intraruminal addition of inert fibre particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. P. Campion  and
B. F. Leek
D. P. Campion
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, University College, Dublin, Veterinary College, Dublin 4, Ireland
B. F. Leek
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, University College, Dublin, Veterinary College, Dublin 4, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

Inert fibre particles were used in a series of experiments in order to quantify the effects of some physical characteristics of dietary long fibre on rumination. Removal of hay from the diet of hay I concentrate-fed sheep reduced true rumination to zero after a period of 8 days, although pseudorumination, much reduced in duration, persisted. Then by introducing loose, chopped, inert polyethylene particles through a rumen cannula, rumination was restored. When different masses of loose inert polyethylene particles chopped into 10-mm lengths were placed in the rumen, the time spent ruminating was found to be directly proportional to mass of fibre placed in the rumen (P < 0·001). By inserting a fixed mass of particles of different lengths, the optimum length of inert fibre for rumination to occur was found to lie between 7 and 30 mm. Finally, when, in place of loose fibre, a polyethylene fibre ‘pompom’, fixed on a rod, was introduced via the cannula and placed so as to brush different areas of the retkulorumen, it was found that the greatest rumination response was evoked when the pompom was allowed to stimulate mechanically the cranial regions of the retkulorumen (P < 0·05). It is concluded that inert polyethylene fibre mimicked the peripheral excitatory effects of dietary fibre by stimulating mechanoreceptors (epithelial receptors) located in the cranial portions of the retkulorumen. Adding about 50 g of 7 to 30 mm inert fibre caused sheep on low-fibre diets to ruminate normally for over 3 h.

Keywords

fibremechanoreceptorsrumen epitheliumruminationsheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 71 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, R. W. and Kay, R. N. B. 1959. Stimulation and inhibition of reticulum contractions, rumination and parotid secretions from the forestomach of conscious sheep. Journal of Physiology, London 149: 43–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balch, C. C. 1971. Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of the extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristic of roughages. British journal of Nutrition 26: 383–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumont, R., Malbert, C. H. and Ruckebusch, Y. 1990. Mechanical stimulation of rumen fill and alimentary behaviour in sheep. Animal Production 50:123–128.Google Scholar
Campion, D. P. and Leek, B. F. 1994. A fibre “appetite” in sheep may be the result of inadequate sensory input to the rumination centres. VIII International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, Willingen, Germany. Proceedings of the Society of Nutritional Physiology, Bd 3: p. 121.Google Scholar
Deswysen, A. G. 1978. The voluntary intake, eating and ruminating behaviour of sheep fed on silage of different chop lengths. Animal Production 26: 362.Google Scholar
Deswysen, A. G. and Ehrlein, H. J. 1981. Silage intake, rumination and pseudo-rumination activity in sheep studied by radiography and jaw movement recordings. British Journal of Nutrition 46: 327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leek, B. F. 1976. A simple and effective ruminal cannulation technique in sheep. Journal of Physiology, London 263: 233P.Google Scholar
Leek, B. F. and Harding, R. H. 1975. Sensory nervous receptors in the ruminant stomach and reflex control of reticulo-ruminal activity. In Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 60–76. University of New England Publishing.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. R. and Moir, R. J. 1964. Rumination in sheep: the influence of rumination and grinding upon the passage and digestion of food. Australian Journal of Agicultural Research 15: 635–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. and Malbert, C. H. 1988. [Chewing cycles of ruminating type in vagotomized ewes.] Reproduction, Nutrition, Developpement 28: suppl. 1, pp. 143–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalk, A. F. and Amadon, R. S. 1928. Physiology of the ruminant stomach. Bulletin of the North Dakota Agricultural Experimental Station no. 216, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Welch, J. G. 1967. Appetite control in sheep by indigestible fibres. Journal of Animal Science 26: 849–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, J. G. 1982. Rumination, particle size and passage from the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 54: 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, J. G. 1990. Inert plastics as indicators of physiological processes in the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 68: 2930–2935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, J. G. and Smith, A. M. 1968. Influence of fasting on rumination activity in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 27: 1734–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, J. G. and Smith, A. M. 1971. Physical stimulation of rumination activity. Journal of Animal Science 33:1118–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar