Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:47:07.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Keeping growing cattle outside during winter: behaviour, production and climatic demand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. Redbo ,
I. Mossberg ,
A. Ehrlemark  and
M. Ståhl-Högberg
I. Redbo
Affiliation:
Kungsängen Research Centre, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
I. Mossberg
Affiliation:
Kungsängen Research Centre, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
A. Ehrlemark
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Engineering — Farm Buildings, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7032, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
M. Ståhl-Högberg
Affiliation:
Kungsängen Research Centre, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Keeping cattle inside on concrete slatted floors can be detrimental to their health and behaviour and is also costly. Therefore, 22 steers of the Swedish Red and White Dairy breed were used to investigate the effect of wintering outdoors on growing cattle. The steers had a mean weight of 310 kg at the onset of the study. During winter, 11 ‘indoor’ steers were housed in pens with concrete slatted floors and 11 ‘outdoor’ steers were kept in a field with access to a shelter and trees. From the end of April until slaughter in September, both groups grazed together. During winter, all steers were given clover silage ad libitum. They were weighed every month. The behaviour of the outdoor steers was recorded from November to the end of March. Outdoor temperature, wind speed and solar radiation were measured continuously. A heated model was used in order to calculate the climatic energy demand. The steers were never observed to shiver. They were not observed to use the shelter during daytime. The most frequently observed behaviour was ‘eating’, followed by ‘standing’. The lower the temperature, the more time the steers were observed lying down (P < 0·01). ‘Moving’ increased with increasing temperature (P < 0·05) as well as with increasing wind speed (P < 0·01). During the grazing period following the experiment, the former outdoor steers grew significantly (P < 0·05) better than the former indoor steers. However, there was no significant difference in overall growth rate from start to slaughter. This study suggests that the winter climate in this part of Sweden (latitude 60°N) did not affect in a negative way the welfare or the growth rate of steers kept outdoors.

Keywords

behaviourcattlewinter hardiness
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 35 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreae, U. and Smidt, D. 1982. Behavioural alterations in young cattle on slatted floors. In Disturbed beliaviour in farm animals (ed. Bessei, W.), pp. 51–60. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Andreae, U., Unshelm, J. and Smidt, D. 1980. Verhalten und anpassungsphysiologische Reaktionen von Mastbullen bei unterschiedlicher Belegungsdichte von Spaltenbodenbuchten. Der Tierziiclitcr 32: 467–473.Google Scholar
Beverlin, S. K., Havstad, K. M., Ayers, E. L. and Petersen, M. K. 1989. Forage intake responses to winter cold exposure of free-ranging beef cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucqué, CH. V., Geay, Y. and Fiems, L. O. 1992. Bull beef production in western Europen. In Beef cattle production (ed. Jarrige, R. and Beranger, C.), pp. 307–321. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Burnett, G. A. and Bruce, J. M. 1978. Thermal simulation of a suckler cow. Farm Building Programme 54: 11–13.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, M. and Bergstrom, P. L. 1989. The effect of increased day length in winter on the growth of beef bulls. Rapport, Instituut voor Veeteeltkundig Ondcrzoek, ‘Schoonord’, no. B-337.Google Scholar
Dunn, R. W., Havstad, K. M. and Ayers, E. L. 1988. Grazing behaviour responses of rangeland beef cows to winter ambient temperatures and age. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21: 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlemark, A. 1988. Calculation of sensible heat and moisture loss from housed cattle using a heat balance model. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Department of Farm Buildings, report 60.Google Scholar
Ehrlemark, A., 1991. Heat and moisture dissipation from cattle. Measurements and simulation model. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Department of Farm Buildings, report 77.Google Scholar
Gilbert, F. F. and Bateman, M. C. 1983. Some effects of winter shelter conditions on white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus fawns. Canadian Field-Naturalist 97: 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonyou, H. W., Christopherson, R. J. and Young, B. A. 1979. Effects of cold temperatures and winter conditions on some aspects of behaviour of feedlot cattle. Applied Animal Ethology 5: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, V. and Konggaard, S. P. 1982. Production responses of young calves, fattening bulls, and replacement stock to different types of housing. In Current topics in veterinary medicine and animal science 19 (ed. Signoret, J. P.), pp. 209–214. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, London.Google Scholar
Jones, C. G. and Bruce, J. M. 1978. Shelter studies using thermal models of cattle. Progress in hiometeorology, vol. 2, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Kunz, W. and Vogel, O. 1978. Schwanzspitzenentzündung — ein neues Gesundheitsproblem in der Rindermast. Tierartzliche Umschaii 33: 344–353.Google Scholar
Lidfors, L. 1992. Behaviour of bull calves in two different housing systems: deep litter in an uninsulated building versus slatted floor in an insulated building. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Hygiene, report 30.Google Scholar
Madsen, E. B. 1986. Tail tip inflammation in young fattening bulls on slatted floors. In Welfare aspects of housing systems for veal calves and fattening bulls (ed. Schlichting, M. C. and Smidt, D.), Agriculture Commission of the European Communities, seminar, pp. 131–138. Mariensee.Google Scholar
Malechec, J. C. and Smith, B. M. 1976. Behaviour of range cows in response to winter weather. Journal of Range Management 29: 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1993. Beef yearbook, Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Mossberg, I. 1992. Environmental influences on growing bulls in two housing systems. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, report 217. (Doctor's thesis).Google Scholar
Mossberg, I., Lindell, L., Johnsson, S. and Törnquist, M. 1993. Insulated and uninsulated housing systems for growing bulls fed grass silage ad libitum. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 43:107–115.Google Scholar
Mossberg, I., Lindell, L., Johnsson, S., Törnquist, M. and Engstrand, U. 1991. Two housing systems for intensively reared bulls slaughtered in two weight ranges. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 42: 167–176.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. A., Hannan, J. and Monaghan, M. 1987. A survey of lameness in beef cattle housed on slats and on straw. In Current topics in veterinary medicine and animal science, vol. 40 (ed. Wierenga, H. K. and Petersee, D. J.), pp. 67–72. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Petchey, A. M. and Abdulkader, J. 1991. Intake and behaviour of cattle at different food barriers. Animal Production 52: 576–577 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics. Version 5. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Unshelm, J. 1983. Applicability of indicators in animal welfare research. In Current topics in veterinary medicine and animal science, vol. 23 (ed. Smidt, D.), pp. 225–232. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1971. Prediction of heat losses from cattle exposed to cold outdoor environments. Journal of Applied Physiology 30: 684–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkerson, L. 1992. SYSTAT version 5.2. SYSTAT, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. and Hunter, E. A. 1986. The effect of winter food level on compensatory growth of weaned, suckled calves grazed at two sward heights. Animal Production 43: 211–223.Google Scholar
Young, B. A. 1981. Cold stress as it affects animal production. Journal of Animal Science 52: 154–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed