Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:01:49.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy and nitrogen metabolism in Holstein-Friesian cows during early lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

F. Sutter
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Sciences, Animal Nutrition, Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Centre/LFW, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
D. E. Beever
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, (CEDAR), Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 6AT
Get access

Abstract

Energy and nitrogen metabolism were examined at weekly intervals during lactation weeks 1 to 8 in Holstein-Friesian cows (no. = 9) offered a diet of hay, maize pellets (whole plant) and concentrates, (barley, maize and soya bean; forage : concentrate ratio 65 : 35), with feeding levels close to ad libitum.

After calving, the cows lost body weight until week 7, with peak milk yield (35 kg/day) recorded during week 3. Dry-matter intakes increased progressively to week 4 then remained relatively constant. Apparent digestibility of dietary energy was unaffected by stage of lactation but the overall value was low (0·653) indicative of the quantity and quality of long hay in the diet. Metabolizable energy intakes ranged between 163 and 202 MJ/day, with little between-week variation after that between weeks 1 and 2 (P < 0·01). Milk energy output was relatively stable during weeks 1 to 4 but then declined progressively for each remaining week, whilst heat energy output was relatively constant throughout. Estimates of body energy retention indicated the cows were in negative energy balance at all times, being greater in week 1 (64 MJ/day, P < 0·01) than weeks 2 to 4 (mean, 35 MJ/day) or weeks 5 to 8 (22 MJ/day). Digestible nitrogen (N) intake was reduced in week 1, whilst apparent N digestibility declined significantly , with little between-week variation after that between weeks 1 and 2 < 0·05) as lactation progressed. The cows were in negative N balance (–19 g/day) during week 1, with zero (week 2) or positive balances noted thereafter.

It is concluded that during early lactation, the extent of body tissue mobilization in average yielding cows can be substantial and prolonged, whilst attainment of positive body N status occurred earlier and was not related to the energy status of the cows.

Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1990. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Report no. 5. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: energy. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B. 60: 729804.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Andrew, S. M. Waldo, D. R. and Erdman, R. A. 1994. Direct analysis of body composition of dairy cows at three physiological stages. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 30223033.Google Scholar
Baracos, V. E., Brun-Bellut, J. and Marie, M. 1991. Tissue protein synthesis in lactating and dry dairy goats. British Journal of Nutrition 66: 451465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, D. E. and Currie, W. B., 1980. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 15141529.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Cammell, S. B., Sutton, J. D. and Humphries, D. J. 1998a. The effect of stage of harvest of maize silage on the concentration and efficiency of utilisation of metabolisable energy by lactating dairy cows. In Energy metabolism of farm animals (ed. McCracken, K., Unsworth, E. F. and Wylie, A. R. G.), proceedings of the 14th energy symposium, pp. 359363. CABI, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Cammell, S. B., Sutton, J. D., Rowe, N. and Perrott, G. E. 1998b. Energy metabolism in high yielding dairy cows. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1998 p. 13.Google Scholar
Botts, R. L., Hemken, R. W. and Bull, L. S. 1979. Protein reserves in the lactating cow. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 433440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, E. 1965. Report of sub-comittee on constants and factors. In Energy metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), proceedings of the third symposium. European Association for Animal Production publication no. 11, pp. 441443.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J., Ivings, W. E., Dhanoa, M. S. and Sutton, J. D. 1992. Changes in body components of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows over the first 29 weeks of lactation. Animal Production 55: 339353.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, L. and Klein, M. 1980. [The effect of carbon and nitrogen content on the urine energy of cattle, sheep, swine and rats]. Archiv für Tierernaehrung 30: 743750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Journet, M. and Remond, B., 1981. Response of dairy cows to protein level in early lactation. Livestock Production Science 8: 2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahan, D. C. and Mangan, L. T. 1975. Evaluation of various protein sequences on the nutritional carry over from gestation to lactation with first litter sows. Journal of Nutrition 105: 1291-1298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moorby, J. M., Dewhurst, R. J. and Marsden, S. 1996. Effect of increasing digestible undegraded protein supply to dairy cows in late gestation on the yield and composition of milk during the subsequent lactation. Animal Science 63: 201213.Google Scholar
Motil, K. J., Montandon, C. M., Hachey, D. L., Boutbon, T. W., Klein, P. D. and Garza, C., 1989. Relationships among lactational performance, maternal diet and body protein metabolism in humans. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 43: 681691.Google Scholar
Pine, A. P., Jessop, N. S. and Oldham, J. D. 1994. Maternal protein reserves and their influence on lactational performance in rats. British Journal of Nutrition 71: 1327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, C. K. and Beever, D. E. 1995. Energy requirements and response; a UK perspective. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow, (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J., Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A. F.), British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 19, pp. 3141.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. B. and Van Soest, P. J. 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. The analysis of dietary fibre in food (ed. James, W. P. T. and Theander, O.), pp. 123158. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Schneeberger, H. and Landis, J. 1984. [Energy and protein requirements for ruminants.] Landwirtschaftliche Lehrmittelzentrale Zollikofen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Sutter, F. and Kreuzer, M. 1997. Response of parameters indicating metabolic disorders in energy turnover to an early-lactational protein deficit associated with a restricted energy supply in cows. Proceeding of the IXth international conference on production diseases in farm animals (ed. Martens, H.), p. 183. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Cammell, S. B., Beever, D. E., Haines, M. J. and Spooner, M. C. 1991. The effect of energy and protein sources on energy and nitrogen balances in Friesian cows in early lactation. Proceedings of the 12th symposium on energy metabolism of farm animals, Zurich, Switzerland (ed. Wenk, C. and Boessinger, M.), EAAP publication no. 58, pp. 288291.Google Scholar
VDLUFA. 1976. Methode 7-2-1. In Methodenbuch Band 3, Verband Deutscher landwirtschaftlicher Untersucklings- und Forschungsanstalten. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Yan, T., Gordon, F. J., Agnew, R. E. , Porter, M. G. and Patterson, D. C. 1997. The metabolisable energy requirement for maintenance and the efficiency of utilisation of metabolisable energy for lactation by dairy cows offered grass silage-based diets. Livestock Production Science 51: 141150.Google Scholar