Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:03:21.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of previous grazing experience and ewe presence on the response to novel grass species by weaned lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C.J.C. Phillips
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Science, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
M.Y.I. Youssef
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Science, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
Get access

Abstract

Forty single lambs were either artificially reared indoors or were at pasture with their mothers until weaning at 3 months of age, after which one half of each group were joined by five adult, dry ewes, to examine the effects of grazing experience and presence of adult ewes on the response to the introduction of novel grass species. Lamb groups sequentially grazed paddocks with one, two, three and then four grass species in four 1-week periods, and grazing and ruminating times and pasture biting rates were recorded during daylight hours. In the first period the lambs grazed only perennial ryegrass, then timothy, cocksfoot and finally red fescue were introduced in periods 2 to 4 respectively. The total time that lambs spent grazing and ruminating were both increased (P < 0·001) by grazing experience and to a lesser extent by the presence of adult ewes. Pasture biting rate was considerably increased by experience, and to a lesser extent adult presence, with a synergistic effect between these two factors (P < 0·001). Timothy and to a lesser extent perennial ryegrass were the most preferred species, and lambs spent less time grazing cocksfoot than either of these two, and even less time grazing red fescue (P < 0·001). Experience of grazing particularly increased the time spent grazing cocksfoot and red fescue (P < 0·001), but the presence of adult ewes did not increase the time lambs spent grazing novel species (P = 0·59). The pasture biting rate was greater on species that the lambs preferred grazing (P < 0·001), but neither experience nor ewe presence increased the biting rate on novel species in the period of their introduction. It is concluded that although both grazing experience and, to a lesser extent adult presence, increased the total time spent grazing and the pasture biting rate, only grazing experience increased the acceptability of novel species.

Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, G. W. and Maller, R. A. 1974. Some aspects of competition between sheep for supplementary feed. Animal Production 19: 309314.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. W. and Maller, R. A. 1977. Effects of nutritional experience in early and adult life on the performance and dietary habits of sheep. Applied Animal Ethology 3: 526.Google Scholar
Barthram, G. T. 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. Biennial report 1984-1985. Hill Farming Research Organisation, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Burritt, E. A. and Provenza, F. D. 1989. Food learning ability of lambs to distinguish safe from harmful foods. Journal of Animal Science 67: 17321739.Google Scholar
Flores, E. R. 1990. Acquisition of foraging skills by lambs eating grass or shrub. Dissertation Abstracts International. B, Sciences and Engineering 50: 3248B.Google Scholar
Flores, E. R., Provenza, F. D. and Balph, D. F. 1989. Relationship between plant maturity and foraging experience of lambs grazing hycrest crested wheatgrass. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 279284.Google Scholar
Hepp, C., Milne, J. A., Illius, A. W. and Beattie, M. M. 1996. The effect of summer management of perennial rygrass-dominant swards on plant and animal responses in the autumn when grazed by sheep. 2. Herbage intake and grazing behaviour. Grass and Forage Science 51: 260269.Google Scholar
Hodge, R. W., Bogdanovic, B. and Scott, B. J. 1981. The influence of previous experience as young lambs on the acceptance of protein supplements by sheep. In Recent advances in animal nutrition in Australia (ed. Farrell, D. J.). University of New England Publishing Unit, Australia.Google Scholar
Hubbard, C. E. 1968. Grasses, a guide to their structure, identification, uses, and distribution in the British Isles. Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar
Jamieson, W. S. 1975. Studies on the herbage intake and grazing behaviour of cattle and sheep. Ph. D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Key, C. and McIver, R. M. 1980. The effects of maternal influences on sheep: breed differences in grazing, resting and courtship behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 6: 3348.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1983. GENSTAT: a general statistical program. Numerical Algorithms Group Limited, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Lobato, J. E. R., Pearce, G. R. and Beilharz, R. G. 1980. Effects of early familiarization with dietary supplements on the subsequent ingestion of molasses urea blocks by sheep. Applied Animal Ethology 6: 149161.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. J., Hinch, G. N. and Adams, D. B. 1992. The behaviour of sheep. Biological principles and implications for production. CAB International, Wallingford, UK and CSIRO, Australia.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food/Agricultural Development and Advisory Service. 1986. The analysis of agricultural materials, third edition. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mottershead, B. E., Lynch, J. J., Elwin, R. L. and Green, G. C. 1985. A note on the acceptance of several types of cereal grain by young sheep with and without prior experience of wheat. Animal Production 41: 257259.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D., Parsons, A. J., Newman, J. A., Orr, R. J. and Harvey, A. 1993. The effects of group size on grazing time in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 101109.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C. 1985. Conserved forage as a buffer feed for dairy cows. Ph. D. thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C. and Youssef, M. Y. I. 2003. The effect of previous experience of four pasture species on the grazing behaviour of sheep: the responses of ewes and their lambs. Animal Science 77: 329333.Google Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C., Youssef, M. Y. I. and Chiy, P. C. 1999. The effect of introducing timothy, cocksfoot and red fescue into a perennial ryegrass sward and the application of sodium fertilizer on the behaviour of male and female cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 61: 215226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenza, F. D. and Balph, D. F. 1987. Diet learning by domestic ruminants: theory, evidence and practical implications. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 211232.Google Scholar
Ramos, A. and Tennessen, T. 1992. Effects of previous grazing experience on the grazing behaviour of lambs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 4352.Google Scholar
Rind, M. I. and Phillips, C. J. C. 1999. The effects of group size on the ingestive and social behaviour of grazing dairy cows. Animal Science 68: 589596.Google Scholar
Thorshalldottir, A. G., Provenza, F. D. and Balph, D. F. 1987. Food aversion learning in lambs with or without a mother: discrimination, novelty and persistence. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 327340.Google Scholar
Thorhallsdottir, A. G., Provenza, F. D. and Balph, D. F. 1990. The role of the mother in the intake of harmful foods by lambs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 25: 3544.Google Scholar