Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:47:23.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the performance of growing pigs given diets containing manioc

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. A. Taylor  and
I. G. Partridge
J. A. Taylor
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
I. G. Partridge
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
Get access

Extract

The potential problems concerning the use of manioc, from the processed roots of cassava (Manihot esculenta), have been reviewed by Oke (1978) and Walker (1983). Although current legislation has ensured that in recent years the levels of cyanogenic glucoside in imported cassava have been negligible (Walker, 1985), there is still conflicting evidence on the maximum level of manioc which can be included in pig diets without adverse effects on digestion and performance. In a previous study (Partridge, 1985), 300 g manioc per kg tended to increase the proportion of energy apparently absorbed from the large intestine compared with lower levels. This may have been partially responsible for some of the digestive upsets found with young pigs by O'Grady and Hanrahan (1979). Evidence of the effect of manioc on performance can be misleading due to palatability problems and therefore lower food intakes (Müller, Chou and Nah, 1975; Papodopoulos, Ziras and Kalaissakis, 1983).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 457 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. and Pittman, R. J. 1972. Effect of level of feed intake on the performance and carcass compositon of growing pigs. Animal Production 14: 199–208.Google Scholar
Müller, Z., Chou, K. C. and Nah, K. C. 1975. [Cassava as a total substitute for cereals in livestock and poultry rations.] Proceeding of the Conference on Animal Feeds of Tropical and Subtropical Origin, pp. 85–95. Tropical Products Institute, London.Google Scholar
O'grady, J. F. and Hanrahan, T. J. 1979. Pig production. Annual Report of An Foras Táluntais, pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
Oke, O. L. 1978. Problems in the use of cassava as animal feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3: 345–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papodopoulos, G., Ziras, E. and Kalaissakis, P. K. 1983. [Replacement of cereals by tapioca in rations of fattening pigs.] Bulletin of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society 34: 22–31.Google Scholar
Partridge, I. G. 1985. The digestion of diets containing manioc by young pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 12: 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. 1983. Cereal replacers as alternative sources of energy for pigs. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1983 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 43–57. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. 1985. Cassava and tallow in diets for growing pigs. Animal Production 40: 345–350.Google Scholar