Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:43:54.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of altering the hormone status of ewes on the outflow rate of protein supplements from the rumen and so on protein degradability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. T. Ngongoni ,
J. J. Robinson ,
R. N. B. Kay ,
R. G. A. Stephenson ,
T. Atkinson ,
I. Grant  and
G. Henderson
N. T. Ngongoni
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
R. N. B. Kay
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
R. G. A. Stephenson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
T. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
I. Grant
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
G. Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry, University of Aberdeen, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Abstract

Four experiments were carried out on individually penned Finn Dorset and Suffolk × Finn Dorset ewes receiving complete diets of milled hay and concentrates and rationed at various levels below voluntary intake. In the first experiment, 20 non-pregnant non-lactating ewes were each given daily 1·6 kg food and injected intramuscularly with either isotonic saline (control), progesterone plus oestrogen (20 mg + 80 ng per 24 h) to mimic hormone status in pregnancy, bromocriptine (1 mg per 12 h) to suppress plasma prolactin, or thyrotrophin releasing factor (TRF) to elevate plasma concentrations of prolactin and the iodothyronines. Fractional outflow rates of chromium-mordanted fish meal from the rumen were estimated from the rate of excretion of chromium in faeces and were proportionately 0·25 higher for ewes given TRF than for controls (P < 0·025). None of the other treatments had a significant effect on outflow rate.

In experiment 2, fractional outflow rates from the rumen were determined during July (long daylength) and again during December (short daylength) in 12 ewes that had their seasonal pattern of plasma prolactin modified by removal of their anterior cervical sympathetic ganglia. Another 12 sham-operated ewes were used as controls. Neither the seasonal changes in prolactin nor their modification by cervical ganglionectomy significantly affected outflow rate.

Twelve non-pregnant non-lactating ewes were used in the third experiment to test the effects of mid-winter shearing (mean ambient temperature −4°C) on fractional outflow rates from the rumen and on the plasma concentrations of prolactin, thyroxine (T4) and cortisol. Shearing caused a drop in plasma prolactin, gave proportional increases (P < 0·05) of 0·47 and 0·16 in T4 and cortisol respectively and gave a 0·12 increase (P < 0·01) in the outflow rate of chromium-mordanted fish meal from the rumen. The increases in T4, and outflow rate were sustained for at least 2 weeks.

For experiment 4, 22 ewes each suckling two lambs were used in three trials to see if variation between ewes in milk production and in lamb growth rate was correlated with variation in outflow rate from the rumen. The only significant correlation (r = 0·68, P < 0·01) was between outflow rate and lamb growth rate for the eight ewes in trial 1. The results of all four experiments are discussed in relation to the mechanisms by which non-dietary factors, via their effect on the rate of outflow of digesta from the rumen, may alter the quantity of protein reaching the abomasum and the likely significance of this alteration on animal performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 395 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1984. Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Appleton, A. B. and Waites, G. M. H. 1957. A surgical approach to the superior cervical ganglion and related structures in the sheep. Journal of Physiology 135: 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, G. K. and Lapwood, K. R. 1979. Effects of modifying olfactory and pineal gland function on the seasonality of semen production and plasma luteinizing hormone, testosterone and prolactin levels in rams. Animal Reproduction Science 1: 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesworth, J. M. 1977. Radioimmunoassays of ovine LH and ovine prolactin using polymerised second antisera. Analytical Biochemistry 80: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I. and Smart, R. 1980. Effects of body fatness at lambing and diet in lactation on body tissue loss, feed intake and milk yield of ewes in early lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. and Boyne, A. W. 1970. The use of automation in determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, with final calculations by computer. Analyst, London 95: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elimam, M. E. and Ørskov, E. R. 1984. Estimation of rates of outflow of protein supplement from the rumen by determining the rate of excretion of chromium-treated protein supplements in faeces. Animal Production 39: 77–80.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. and White, G. A. 1980. Mean retention time of markers in the rumen of pregnant sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13: 455.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Brown, W. B., Al-Banna, A. G. M. and Jones, R. 1981. The effect of daylength on the growth of lambs. 3. Level of feeding, age of lamb and speed of gut-fill response. Animal Production 32: 23–28.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. S., Robinson, J. J. and Fraser, C. 1985. The effect of physiological state on digestion in the ewe and its influence on the quantity of protein reaching the abomasum. Livestock Production Science 12: 59–68.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC. and Williams, A. J. 1962. The effects of pregnancy on the passage of food through the digestive tract of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13: 894–900.Google Scholar
Grovum, W. L. and Williams, V. J. 1973. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate-constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30: 313–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henricks, D. M., Dickey, J. F. and Hill, J. R. 1971. Plasma oestrogen and progesterone levels in cows prior to and during estrus. Endocrinology 98: 1350–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M., Christopherson, R. J. and Milligan, L. P. 1976. The effect of cold exposure of sheep on digestion, rumen turnover time and efficiency of microbial synthesis. British Journal of Nutrition 36: 231–242.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M., Young, B. A. and Christopherson, R. J. 1977. Studies on the relationship between thyroid function, cold acclimation and retention time of digesta in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 45: 1084–1090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, J. A., Cooper, R. A. and Chapman, A. 1984. Effects of shearing housed pregnant ewes on their plasma glucose levels, lamb birth weight and lamb growth rates to 56 days. Animal Production 38: 524 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Mathieson, J. 1970. The automated estimation of chromic oxide. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 29: 30A–31A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. and Ørskov, E. R. 1977. A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. K., Swanson, E. W., Lyke, W. A., Moss, B. R. and Byrne, W. F. 1974. Effect of thyroid status on digestive tract fill and flow rate of undigested residues in cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 57: 193–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1983. Nutrition of the pregnant ewe. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 111–131. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., Foster, W. H. and Forbes, T. J. 1968. An assessment of the variation in milk yield of ewes determined by the lamb-suckling technique. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70: 187–194.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. E. and Clare, N. T. 1963. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. IX. Determination of chromic oxide in faeces using an autoanalyzer. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 121–126.Google Scholar
Swanson, B. W. 1954. The effect upon milk production and body weight of varying withdrawal periods after thyroactive supplement feeding. Journal of Dairy Science 37: 1212–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. L., Robinson, J. J. and McHattie, I. 1978. An effect of physiological state on digestion in the ewe. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 37: 71A (Abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed
Udén, P., Colucci, P. E. and Van Soest, P. J. 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31: 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weston, R. H. 1979. Digestion during pregnancy and lactation in sheep. Annales de Recherches Véterinaires 10: 442–444.Google ScholarPubMed
Weston, R. H. 1983. the effect of mild cold exposure on various aspects of digestion and metabolism in roughage-fed sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 8: 181–184.Google Scholar
Westra, R. and Christopherson, R. J. 1976. Effects of cold on digestibility, retention time of digesta, reticulum motility and thyroid hormones in sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56: 699–708.Google Scholar