Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:59:50.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of the micronization process for preparing cereals for the growing pig. 3. A note on the effect of micronization temperature on the nutritive value of wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. L. J. Lawrence
T. L. J. Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Department of Animal Husbandry, Veterinary Field Station, Neston, Wirral, Cheshire, L64 7TE
Get access

Summary

1. In two experiments the nutritive value for the growing pig of wheat which had been micronized at temperatures of 155°, 190° or 220°C, flaked (rolled) and then ground was compared with wheat which had either been ground, or rolled and then ground.

2. In the first experiment 60 pigs offered individually, restricted amounts of feed were used in a growth and efficiency of conversion study. In the second experiment 15 pigs were used in digestibility and nitrogen retention studies.

3. The highest micronization temperature gave a significant depression in growth rate and in efficiency of conversion of dietary dry matter as compared with the other treatments for which there were no significant differences.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 167 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Greenwood, C. T. 1970. Starch and glycogen. In The Carbohydrates (ed. Pigman, W. and Horton, D.), Vol. 2B (2nd ed.), pp. 471–513. Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, W. H. 1973. Influence of processing on the utilization of grains (starch) by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 1075–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. W. and Anderson, D. L. 1958. Comparison of metabolizable and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. J. Nutr. 64: 587–603.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1967. High level cereal diets for the growing/finishing pig. I. The effect of cereal preparation and water level on the performance of pigs fed diets containing high levels of wheat. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 269–274.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1972. High level cereal diets for the growing/finishing pig. VI. An evaluation of flaked maize, wheat and barley when included at high levels in the diet of the weaned pig grown to cutter weight (160 lb). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79: 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1973a. An evaluation of the micronization process for preparing cereals for the growing pig. 1. Effects on digestibility and nitrogen retention. Anim. Prod. 16: 99–107.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1973b. An evaluation of the micronization process for preparing cereals for the growing pig. 2. Effects on growth rate, food conversion efficiency and carcass characteristics. Anim. Prod. 16: 109–116.Google Scholar
Mercier, Christiane. 1971. Effects of various U.S. grain processes on the alteration and in vitro digestibility of starch granule. Feedstuffs, Minneap. 43 (No. 50): 33.Google Scholar