Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:43:06.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Question(s) of Political Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2014

JASON BARABAS ,
JENNIFER JERIT ,
WILLIAM POLLOCK  and
CARLISLE RAINEY
JASON BARABAS*
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University
JENNIFER JERIT*
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University
WILLIAM POLLOCK*
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University
CARLISLE RAINEY*
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo
*
Jason Barabas is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794–4392 ([email protected]).
Jennifer Jerit is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794–4392 ([email protected]).
William Pollock is Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794–4392 ([email protected]).
Carlisle Rainey is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political knowledge is a central concept in the study of public opinion and political behavior. Yet what the field collectively believes about this construct is based on dozens of studies using different indicators of knowledge. We identify two theoretically relevant dimensions: a temporal dimension that corresponds to the time when a fact was established and a topical dimension that relates to whether the fact is policy-specific or general. The resulting typology yields four types of knowledge questions. In an analysis of more than 300 knowledge items from late in the first decade of the 2000s, we examine whether classic findings regarding the predictors of knowledge withstand differences across types of questions. In the case of education and the mass media, the mechanisms for becoming informed operate differently across question types. However, differences in the levels of knowledge between men and women are robust, reinforcing the importance of including gender-relevant items in knowledge batteries.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 108 , Issue 4 , November 2014 , pp. 840 - 855
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabas, Jason. 2009. “Not the Next IRA: How Health Savings Accounts Shape Public Opinion.” Journal of Health Policy, Politics and Law 34 (April): 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabas, Jason, and Jerit, Jennifer. 2009. “Estimating the Causal Effects of Media Coverage on Policy-Specific Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (January): 79–89.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (February): 194–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1989. “Trends in Americans’ Political Information, 1967–1987.” American Politics Quarterly 17 (4): 422–35.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Bennett, Linda L. M. 1993. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: American's Knowledge of Party Control of the House of Representatives, 1960–1964.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (1): 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl. 1988. “‘Know-Nothings’ Revisited: The Meaning of Political Ignorance Today.” Social Science Quarterly 69 (2): 476–90.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R., and Esarey, Justin. 2010. “Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?” American Journal of Political Science 54 (January): 248–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudreau, Cheryl, and Lupia, Arthur. 2013. “Political Knowledge.” In Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman, James, Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. New York: Cambridge University Press, 171–186.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Kay, Schlozman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea. 2002. “Self-Interest, Social Security, and the Distinctive Participation Patterns of Senior Citizens.” American Political Science Review 96 (Sept.): 565–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, James, Iyengar, Shanto, Lund, Anker Brink, and Salovaara-Moring, Inka. 2009. “Media Systems, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study.” European Journal of Communication 24 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 1179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBell, Matthew. 2013. “Harder Than It Looks: Coding Political Knowledge on the ANES.” Political Analysis 21 (4): 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., Keeter, Scott, and Kennamer, J. David. 1994. “Effects of the News Media Environment on Citizen Knowledge of State Politics and Government.” Journalism Quarterly 71 (Summer): 443–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2011. “Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 73 (1): 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, Jay. 2009. “Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Characteristics- Based and Returns-Based Differences.” Political Behavior 31 (1): 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James. 2005. “Media Matter: How Newspapers and Television News Cover Campaigns and Influence Voters.” Political Communication 22 (Oct-Dec): 463–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna, Branton, Regina P., and Abrajano, Marisa. 2010. “Agenda Setting, Public Opinion, and the Issue of Immigration Reform.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (2): 359–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elo, Kimmo, and Rapeli, Lauri. 2010. “Determinants of Political Knowledge: The Effects of the Media on Knowledge and Information.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 20 (1): 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew. 2008. “Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by Two Standard Deviations.” Statistics in Medicine. Statistics in Medicine 27: 2865–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J., and Caldiera, Gregory A.. 2009. “Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court.” Journal of Politics 71: 429–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2001. “Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences.” American Political Science Review 95 (June): 379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Doris. 2001. Processing Politics: Learning from Television in an Internet Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Doris, and Holyk, Gregory G.. 2012. “Civic Knowledge and Audiovisual Learning.” In The Sage Handbook of Political Communication, eds. Semetko, Holli A. and Scammell, Margaret, 141–72.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan. 1997. “Talking About Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2008. “Does the Message Matter? Candidate-Media Agenda Convergence and Its Effect on Voter Issue Salience.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 134–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 1990. “Shortcuts to Political Knowledge: The Role of Selective Attention and Accessibility.” In Information and Democratic Processes, eds. Ferejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 160–85.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Hahn, Kyu S., Bonfadelli, Heinz, and Marr, Mirko. 2009. “’Dark Areas of Ignorance’ Reconsidered.” Communication Research 36 (3): 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, and Barabas, Jason. 2012. “Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment.” Journal of Politics 74 (July): 672–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, Barabas, Jason, and Bolsen, Toby. 2006. “Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (April): 266–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Paul. 2009. “What Knowledge is Of Most Worth?” In The Political Psychology of Democratic Citizenship, eds. Borgida, Eugene, Federico, Christopher M., and Sullivan, John L.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data.”‘ American Political Science Review 95 (March): 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44: 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. 1997. “Candidate Gender and Women's Psychological Engagement in Politics.” American Politics Quarterly 25 (1): 118–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Ronald D., Curtis, James E., Kay, Barry J., and Brown, Steven D.. 1988. “The Social Sources of Political Knowledge.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 21 (2): 359–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizotte, Mary-Kate, and Sidman, Andrew. 2009. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Politics & Gender 5 (2): 127–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence.” Critical Review 18 (1–3): 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, Robert C. 1990. “Explaining Political Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12 (December): 331–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (4): 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, Robert C., and Bullock, John G.. 2011. “‘Don't Know’ Means ‘Don't Know’: DK Responses and the Public's Level of Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 73 (April): 547–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Melissa K., and Orr, Shannon K.. 2008. “Experimenting with a ‘Third Way’ in Political Knowledge Estimation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (4): 768–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 2001. “Developing Valid Knowledge Scales.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 224–38.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 2000. “Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge.” Political Analysis 8 (1): 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery, and Anderson, Mary. 2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 66 (2): 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Davis, Belinda Creel. 2001. “Asked and Answered: Knowledge Levels When We Will Not Take ‘Don't Know’ for an Answer.” Political Behavior 23 (3): 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2002. “Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 111–26.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P. 2003. “The Political Environment and Ballot Proposition Awareness.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (July): 403–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2010. “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.” Political Behavior 32 (3): 3030–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker-Stephen, Evan. 2013. “Tides of Disagreement: How Reality Facilitates (and Inhibits) Partisan Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 75 (4): 1077–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietryka, Matthew T., and MacIntosh, Randall C.. 2013. “An Analysis of ANES Items and Their Use in the Construction of Political Knowledge Scales.” Political Analysis 21 (4): 407–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Vincent, and Czilli, Edward J.. 1996. “Modeling Patterns of News Recognition and Recall.” Journal of Communication 46 (Spring): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2014. “Visual Political Knowledge: A Different Road to Competence?” Journal of Politics 76 (1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Marcus, and Lupia, Arthur. 2008. “Money, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall and Political Learning Skills.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 169–83.Google Scholar
Rainey, Carlisle. 2014. “Arguing for a Negligible Effect.” Forthcoming, American Journal of Political Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2003. “Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women.” Political Behavior 25 (4): 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schudson, Michael. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shaker, Lee. 2012. “Local Political Knowledge and Assessments of Citizen Competence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 525–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind, and Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2010. “What Do Women Really Know? A Gendered Analysis of Varieties of Political Knowledge.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.”The Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–72.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 2003. “A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen.” Political Communication 20 (June): 109–30.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.