Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:38:54.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mediated Corruption: The Case of the Keating Five

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Dennis F. Thompson
Dennis F. Thompson
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Keating Five case exemplifies a form of a political corruption that is increasingly common in contemporary politics but frequently neglected in contemporary political science. I focus on this form by developing a concept of mediated corruption, which links the acts of individual officials to effects on the democratic process. Unlike conventional corruption, mediated corruption does not require that the public official act with a corrupt motive or that either public officials or citizens receive improper benefits. The concept of mediated corruption provides not only a more coherent account of the case of the Keating Five but also a more fruitful way of reuniting the concepts of systematic corruption in traditional political theory with the concepts of individual corruption in contemporary social science.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 369 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Jill, and Rogers, David. 1991. “The Keating 535: Five Are on the Grill, but Other Lawmakers Help Big Donors, Too.” Wall Street Journal, January 10.Google Scholar
Adams, James Ring. 1990. The Big Fix: Inside the S&L Scandal. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1972. Summa Theologiae. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce. 1990. 110 S. Ct. 1391.Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward C. 1975. “Corruption as a Feature of Governmental Organization.” Journal of Law and Economics 18:587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1989. Political Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berke, Richard L. 1991. “Cranston Rebuked by Ethics Panel.” New York Times, November 21.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CBS News/New York Times. 1991. Telephone interview, National sample of 1280 adults, October 5–7. (Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut).Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity, ed. Hamlin, Alan and Pettit, Philip. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, and Rogers, Joel. 1983. On Democracy. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DeNardo, James. 1980. “Turnout and the Vote: The Joke's on the Democrats.” American Political Science Review 74:406–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobel, J. Patrick. 1978. “The Corruption of a State.” American Political Science Review 72:958–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Paul. 1952. Ethics in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Driver, Julia. 1992. “Caesar's Wife: On the Moral Significance of Appearing Good.” Journal of Philosophy 89:331–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1984. Capital Corruption. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1990/1991. “The Keating Six?” Responsive Community 1:6–9.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. 1972. The Pathology of Politics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Stephen. 1989. “The Dilemma of Election Campaign Finance Reform.” Hofstra Law Review 18:213–300.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist Papers. Ed. Cooke, Jacob E.. Middletown, CT: Wesley an University Press.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold, Johnston, Michael, and LeVine, Victor T., eds. 1989. Political Corruption: A Handbook. 2d ed.New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hugick, Larry. 1991. “Majority Disapproves of Congress.” Gallup Poll Monthly, August, pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
Hugick, Larry, and Hueber, Graham. 1991. “Pharmacists and Clergy Rate Highest for Honesty and Ethics.” Gallup Poll Monthly, May, pp. 29–31.Google Scholar
Kappel, Brett G. 1989. “Judicial Restrictions on Improper Congressional Influence in Administrative Decision-Making: A Defense of the Pillsbury Doctrine.” Journal of Law and Politics 6:135–71.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Daniel H. 1985. “Political Bribery and the Intermediate Theory of Politics.” University of California, Los Angeles Law Review 32:784–851.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Daniel H. 1989. “On Campaign Finance Reform: The Root of All Evil Is Deeply Rooted.” Hofstra Law Review 18:301–67.Google Scholar
McCormick v. U.S. 1991. 111 S.Ct. 1807.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3:243–77.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28:165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15:338–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de. 1949–1951. De l'esprit des Iois. In Montesquieu: Oeuvres Complètes, ed. Caillois, Roger. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Morgan, Peter W. 1992. “The Appearance of Propriety: Ethics Reform and the Blifil Paradoxes.” Stanford Law Review 44:593–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NBC News/Wall Street Journal. 1990. Telephone Interview, National sample of 1002 registered voters, December 8–11. (Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut).Google Scholar
NBC News/Wall Street Journal. 1992. Telephone interview, National sample of 1001 registered voters, April 11–14. (Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut).Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr., 1984. Bribes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1978. “Political Corruption in America: A Search for Definitions and a Theory.” American Political Science Review 78:974–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzo, Stephen, Fricker, Mary, and Moulo, Paul. 1989. Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Henry S. 1990. “Specifying Norms as a Way To Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19:279–310.Google Scholar
Roberts, Robert N. 1985. “Lord, Protect Me from the Appearance of Wrongdoing.” In Public Personnel Policy, ed. Rosenbloom, David H.. Port Washington, N.Y.: Associated Faculty.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1978. Corruption: A Study in Political Economy. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Morton, and Maskell, Jack. 1990. “Congressional Intervention in the Administrative Process: Legal and Ethical Considerations.” Washington: Congressional Research Service Report. 1–78.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1962. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 3d ed.New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Sorauf, Frank J. 1992. Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Andrew. 1992. “Corporate Electoral Activity, Constitutional Discourse, and Conceptions of the Individual.” American Political Science Review 86:626–37.Google Scholar
Taylor, Samuel M. 1991. “Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce: Addressing a ‘New Corruption’ in Campaign Financing.” North Carolina Law Review 69:1060–79.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Harvey J., Vedlitz, Arnold, and DeNardo, James. 1986. “Controversy: Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections?” American Political Science Review 80:1292–1304.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate. Select Committee on Ethics. 1991a. Preliminary Inquiry into Allegations Regarding Senators Cranston, DeConcini, Glenn, McCain, and Riegle, and Lincoln Savings and Loan. 101st Congress, 2d sess., 15 Nov. 1990–16 Jan. 1991.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Select Committee on Ethics. 1991b. Investigation of Senator Alan Cranston Together with Additional Views. 102d Congress, 1st sess., 20 Nov. 1991.Google Scholar
U.S. v. Brewster. 1977. 408 U.S. 521.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Francis. 1991. “Rules of the Game: The Senate's Money Politics.” Rolling Stone, August 8.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1974. “Corruption Is Not Always Scandalous.” In Theft of the City, ed. Gardiner, John A. and Olson, David J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Yoder, Edwin M. Jr., 1991. “The Keating Five: Was It All in a Day's Work?” Washington Post, January 18.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.