Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:27:13.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2014

BRANDICE CANES-WRONE ,
TOM S. CLARK  and
JASON P. KELLY
BRANDICE CANES-WRONE*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
TOM S. CLARK*
Affiliation:
Emory University
JASON P. KELLY*
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
*
Brandice Canes-Wrone is Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs and Professor of Politics, Princeton University, 34 Corwin Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 ([email protected]).
Tom S. Clark is Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Political Science, Emory University, 1555 Dickey Drive, Emory University; Atlanta, GA 30322 ([email protected]).
Jason P. Kelly is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Virginia Tech, Major Williams Hall, Room 517, Virginia Tech; 220 Stanger St; Blacksburg, VA 24061 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most U.S. state supreme court justices face elections or reappointment by elected officials, and research suggests that judicial campaigns have come to resemble those for other offices. We develop predictions on how selection systems should affect judicial decisions and test these predictions on an extensive dataset of death penalty decisions by state courts of last resort. Specifically, the data include over 12,000 decisions on over 2000 capital punishment cases decided between 1980 and 2006 in systems with partisan, nonpartisan, or retention elections or with reappointment. As predicted, the findings suggest that judges face the greatest pressure to uphold capital sentences in systems with nonpartisan ballots. Also as predicted, judges respond similarly to public opinion in systems with partisan elections or reappointment. Finally, the results indicate that the plebiscitary influences on judicial behavior emerge only after interest groups began achieving success at targeting justices for their decisions.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 23 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Bar Association (ABA). 2003. Justice in Jeopardy: Report of the American Bar Association Commission on the 21st Century Judiciary. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Judicature Society (AJS). 2012. “A Significant Battle, An Ongoing War.” Available at: www.ajs.org/ajs/ajs_editorial-template.asp?content_id=1003 (Accessed December 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Aldrich, Allison. 2011. “Another Record Year for the State Courts Project,” The Federalist Paper 2011 (February): 11–2.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and La Ferrara, Eliana. 2011. “A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing.” Harvard University Typescript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2003. “Judicial Elections and Judicial Independence: The Voter's Perspective.” Ohio State Law Journal 64 (1): 13–41.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, Duflo, Esther, and Mullainathan, Sendhi. 2004. “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 249–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Payne, A. Abigail. 2013. “Implementation of Anti-Discrimination Policy: Does Judicial Selection Matter?” American Law and Economics Review 15 (1): 212–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonica, Adam, and Woodruff, Michael J.. 2012. “State Supreme Court Ideology and ‘New-Style’ Judicial Campaigns.” Stanford University Typescript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, John H., and Eisenberg, Theodore. 1999. “Judicial Politics, Death Penalty Appeals, and Case Selection: An Empirical Legal Study.” Southern California Law Review 72 (January/March): 465–503.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D.. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 360–72.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1993. “Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent.” Journal of Politics 55 (4): 914–35.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1206–31.Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard R. W., and Raphael, Steven. 2002. “Life Terms or Death Sentences: The Uneasy Relationship between Judicial Elections and Capital Punishment.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 92 (Spring/Summer): 609–40.Google Scholar
Bruhl, Aaron-Andrew P., and Leib, Ethan J.. 2012. “Elected Judges and Statutory Interpretation.” University of Chicago Law Review 79 (Fall): 1215–83.Google Scholar
Caldarone, Richard P., Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Clark, Tom S.. 2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” Journal of Politics 71 (2): 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Clark, Tom S., and Park, Jee-Kwang. 2012. “Judicial Independence and Retention Elections.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 28 (2): 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Shotts, Kenneth W.. 2007. “When Do Elections Encourage Ideological Rigidity?” American Political Science Review 101 (2): 273–88.Google Scholar
Cann, Damon M., and Wilhelm, Teena. 2011. “Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research 39 (3): 557–81.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C. 1972. “The Impact of Formal Selection Processes on the Characteristics of Judges—Reconsidered.” Law and Society Review 6 (May): 579–93.Google Scholar
Caufield, Rachel P. 2005. “In the Wake of White: How States Are Responding to Republican Party of Minnesota v. White and How Judicial Elections Are Changing.” Akron Law Review 38 (3): 625–47.Google Scholar
Champagne, Anthony. 2001. “Interest Groups and Judicial Elections.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 34 (June): 1391–409.Google Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., Gulati, Gaurang Mitu, and Posner, Eric A.. 2011. “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather than Appointed Judiciary.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 26 (2): 290–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deno, Kevin T., and Mehay, Stephen L.. 1987. “Municipal Management Structure and Fiscal Performance: Do City Managers Make a Difference?” Southern Economic Journal 53 (3): 627–42.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2002. “Selecting Selection Systems.” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, eds. Burbank, Stephen B. and Friedman, Barry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 191–226.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Mackuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002a. The Macro Polity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002b. “Panderers or Shirkers? Politicians and Public Opinion.” In Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy and the Future of American Democracy, ed. Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin I.. New York: Oxford University Press, 76–85.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles. 2002. “Behavioral Factors Affecting Judicial Independence.” In Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, eds. Burbank, Stephen B. and Friedman, Barry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 148–59.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Liebman, James S., West, Valerie, and Kiss, Alexander. 2004. “A Broken System: The Persistent Patterns of Reversals of Death Sentences in the United States.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (2): 209–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goelzhauser, Greg. 2012. “Accountability and Judicial Performance: Evidence from Case Dispositions.” Justice System Journal 33 (3): 249–61.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2008. “Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and the ‘New Style’ Judicial Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 59–76.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 107–38.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95 (2): 315–30.Google Scholar
Hanssen, F. Andrew. 2002. “On the Politics of Judicial Selection: Lawyers and State Campaigns for the Merit Plan.” Public Choice 110 (January): 79–97.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie, and Baum, Lawrence. 1992. “‘New Style’ Judicial Campaigns and the Voters: Economic Issues and Union Members in Ohio.” Western Political Quarterly 45 (4): 921–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Gregory A., and Gordon, Sanford C.. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind when It Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iaryczower, Matias, Lewis, Garrett, and Shum, Matthew. 2013. “To Elect or to Appoint? Bias, Information, and Responsiveness of Bureaucrats and Politicians.” Journal of Public Economics 97 (January): 230–44.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 2002. “The Effect of Media Based Campaigns on Candidate and Voter Behavior: Implications for Judicial Elections.” Indiana Law Review 35 (3): 691–9.Google Scholar
Klein, David, and Baum, Lawrence. 2001. “Ballot Information and Voting Decisions in Judicial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (4): 709–28.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009a. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 367–86.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009b. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 107–21.Google Scholar
Lim, Claire S. H., Snyder, James M., and Strömberg, David. 2012. “The Judge, the Politician and the Press: Newspaper Coverage and Criminal Sentencing Across Electoral Systems.” Cornell University Typescript.Google Scholar
Marcus, Ruth. 1987. “Justice White Criticizes Judicial Elections.” Washington Post, August 11, A5.Google Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1970. “Choosing Among 133 Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 34 (3): 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Council for State Courts (NCSC). 2003. “Judicial Democracy.” Available at http://www.csg.org/knowledgecenter/docs/TA0310JudicialDem.pdf (accessed December 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2011. “Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic U.S. State Public Opinion.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (4): 415–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, David K., Gelman, Andrew, and Bafumi, Joseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis 12 (4): 375–85.Google Scholar
Pinello, Daniel R. 1999.“Linking Party to Judicial Ideology in American Courts: A Meta-Analysis,” Justice System Journal 20: 219.Google Scholar
Poulos, John W. 1990. “Capital Punishment, the Legal Process, and the Emergence of the Lucas Court in California.” U.C. Davis Law Review 23 (2): 157–332.Google Scholar
Reidinger, Paul. 1987. “The Politics of Judging.” ABA Journal 73 (4): 52–8.Google Scholar
Sample, James, Skaggs, Adam, Blitzer, Jonathan, and Casey, Linda. 2010. “The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2000–2009: Decade of Change.” New York: Brennan Center for Justice.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, Kenneth, and Gelman, Andrew. 2011. “Analytical and Graphical Methods for Understanding Hierarchical Models with an Application to Estimating State Trends in Death Penalty Public Opinion.” Columbia University Typescript.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Joanna M. 2009. “Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?” Duke Law Journal 58 (7): 1589–626.Google Scholar
Skaggs, Adam, da Silva, Maria, Casey, Linda, and Hall, Charles W.. 2011. “The New Politics of Judicial Elections: 2009–10.” New York: Brennan Center for Justice.Google Scholar
Streb, Matthew J. 2007. Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Tabarrok, Alexander, and Helland, Eric A.. 1999. “Court Politics: The Political Economy of Tort Awards.” Journal of Law and Economics. 42 (1): 157–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traut, Carol Ann, and Emmert, Craig F.. 1998. “Expanding the Integrated Model of Judicial Decision Making: The California Justices and Capital Punishment.” Journal of Politics 60 (4): 1166–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vining, Richard L. Jr., and Wilhelm, Teena. 2010. “Explaining High-Profile Coverage of State Supreme Court Decisions.” Social Science Quarterly 91 (3):704–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vining, Richard L. Jr., and Wilhelm, Teena. 2011. “Measuring Issue Salience in State Courts of Last Resort.” Political Science Quarterly 64 (3): 559–72.Google Scholar
Vlaicu, Razvan, and Whalley, Alexander. 2012. “Hierarchical Accountability in Government: Theory and Evidence.” University of Maryland Typescript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshaw, Christopher, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2012. “How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion Issues?” Journal of Politics 74 (1): 203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Debra Cassens. 2009. “O'Connor: Want a Qualified, Impartial Judiciary? Don't Use Contested Elections.” ABA Journal, December 10, 2009. Available at http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/oconnor_want_a_qualified_impartial_judiciary_dont_use_contested_elections/ (Accessed March 5, 2012)Google Scholar
Yanus, Alixandra B. “An Examination of Media Coverage of State Supreme Courts.” Justice System Journal 30 (2): 18095.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Canes-Wrone Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Canes-Wrone Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 123.4 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.