Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:50:49.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: A Corrigendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Nathaniel Beck
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Jonathan N. Katz
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
R. Michael Alvarez
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Geoffrey Garrett
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Peter Lange
Affiliation:
Duke University

Abstract

Alvarez, Garrett and Lange (1991) used cross-national panel data on the Organization for Economic Coordination and Development nations to show that countries with left governments and encompassing labor movements enjoyed superior economic performance. Here we show that the standard errors reported in that article are incorrect. Reestimation of the model using ordinary least squares and robust standard errors upholds the major finding of Alvarez, Garrett and Lange, regarding the political and institutional causes of economic growth but leaves the findings for unemployment and inflation open to question. We show that the model used by Alvarez, Garrett and Lange, feasible generalized least squares, cannot produce standard errors when the number of countries analyzed exceeds the length of the time period under analysis. Also, we argue that ordinary least squares with robust standard errors is superior to feasible generalized least squares for typical cross-national panel studies.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, R. Michael, Garrett, Geoffrey, and Lange, Peter. 1991. “Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance.” American Political Science Review 85:539–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1992. “Model Assessment via Cross Validation.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1993. “Panel Methods for Cross-national Data.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Blake, Donald, and Dion, Stéphane. 1993. “Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 37:4062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, David, and Peters, Stephen. 1984. “Bootstrapping a Regression Equation: Some Empirical Results.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander, and Swank, Duane. 1992. “Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–1982.” American Political Science Review 86:658–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kmenta, Jan. 1986. Elements of Econometrics. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lange, Peter, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 1985. “The Politics of Growth: Strategic Interaction and Economic Performance in the Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1974–1980.” Journal of Politics 47:792827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, Richard W. 1967. “Efficient Estimation of a System of Regression Equations When Disturbances Are Both Serially and Contemporaneously Correlated.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 62:500509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 1986. SUGI Supplemental Library User's Guide, Version 5 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Swank, Duane. 1992. “Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Democratic Capitalist Nations.” American Political Science Review 86:3854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Halbert. 1984. Asymptotic Theory for Econometricians. Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
White, Kenneth, Wong, S., Whistler, D., and Haun, S.. 1990. Shazam User's Reference Manual Version 6.2. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.