Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:01:56.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utility, Property, and Political Participation: James Mill on Democratic Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Shannon C. Stimson  and
Murray Milgate
Shannon C. Stimson
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Murray Milgate
Affiliation:
University of Bradford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On the philosophical plane, James Mill's political thinking began from a model of man quintessentially utilitarian in constitution. Starting with individual agents, it was to his account of the science of human nature that he turned in the quest for a science of politics suitable for the modern world. If James Mill's science of politics was individualist in character, it was neither automatically nor necessarily democratic in the practical political arena. On that subject, everything turned on the question of judging when (or if) individual capacity had reached an acceptable standard. This criterion proved to be sufficiently malleable to allow him to appear either expansive and democratic or narrow and elitist, as the case required.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 87 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 901 - 911
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, Terence. 1980. “Utilitarianism, Feminism, and the Franchise: James Mill and His Critics.” History of Political Thought 1:91–116.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. [1838–1843] 1962. The Works of Jeremy Bentham. 10 vols. Ed. Bowring, John. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa. 1956. “Middle-Class Consciousness in English Politics.” Past and Present 9:65–74.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1839. The Works of Edmund Burke. 9 vols. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. 1988. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Carr, Wendell Robert. 1971a. “James Mill's Politics Reconsidered: Parliamentary Reform and the Triumph of Truth.” Historical Journal 14:553–80.Google Scholar
Carr, Wendell Robert. 1971b. “James Mill's Politics: A Final Word.” Historical Journal, 15:315–20.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory. 1989. Citizens and Saints: Politics and Anti-Politics in Early British Socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1971. “The Classical Economists and the Labourer.” In The Classical Economists and Economic Policy, ed. Coats, A.W.. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, John. 1983. That Noble Science of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Marchi, Neil. 1983. “The Case for James Mill.” In Methodological Controversies in Economics, ed. Coats, A. W.. New York: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Gay, Peter. 1984. Education of the Senses. Vol. 1 of The Bourgeois Experience: Victoria to Freud. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grampp, William D. 1948. “On the Politics of the Classical Economists.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 62:714–47.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 1985. “James Mill and Scottish Moral Philosophy.” Political Studies 33:628–36.Google Scholar
Halévy, Elie. 1960–1961. A History of the English People in the Nineteenth Century. 2nd English ed. Trans. Watkins, E.I. and Barker, D.A.. 6 vols. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Halévy, Elie. [1928]. 1972. The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Joseph. 1962. “James Mill on Universal Suffrage and the Middle Class.” Journal of Politics, 24:167–90.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Joseph. 1963. James Mill and the Art of Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. [1752]. 1985. Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary. Ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Terence W. 1953. “James Mill and the Political Education of Ricardo.” Cambridge Journal, 7:81–100.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis. 1809. “Parliamentary Reform.” Edinburgh Review 14:276–306.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis. 1819. “State of the Country.” Edinburgh Review 32:293–309.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. 1829. Miscellaneous Writings.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James. 1818. “Universal Suffrage.” Edinburgh Review 31:165–203.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James. 1820. “Parliamentary Reform.” Edinburgh Review 34:461–502.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, James [1836] 1853. Memoirs of the Life of the Right Honourable Sir James Mackintosh. 2d ed. 2 vols. Ed. Mackintosh, Robert James. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Milgate, Murray, and Stimson, Shannon C.. 1991. Ricardian Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1806a. “Colquhoun's System of Education for the Labouring Poor. Literary Journal, 2d ser. 2:528–39.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1806b. “Craig on Millar.” Literary Journal, 2d ser. 1:624–29.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1806c. “Filangieri on the Science of Legislation.” Literary Journal, 2d ser. 2:225–42.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1806d. “Sir James Steuart's Works.” Literary Journal, 2d ser. 1:225–35.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1806e. “Tooke's Diversions of Purley.” Literary Journal, 2d ser, 1:1–16.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1809. “Emancipation of Spanish America.” Edinburgh Review, 13:277–311.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1812], 1969. Schools for All, in Preference to Schools for Churchmen Only. First published in The Philanthropist, as reprinted in Burston, W.H. (ed): James Mill on Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1813. “Education of the Poor.” Edinburgh Review 21:207–19.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1814. “Corn Laws.” Eclectic Review, n.s., 2:1–17.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1815. “Stewart's Philosophy of the Human Mind.” British Review and London Critical Journal, 6:170–200.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1817a. Banks for Savings. In the Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1816–1824), II, 91–101.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1817b. Benefit Societies. In the Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1816–1824), II, 263–69.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1818a. Economists. In the Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1816–1824), III, 703–724.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1818b]. 1969. Education. First published in the Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1826–1824) and reprinted in Burston, W.H. (ed): James Mill on Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1820a] 1825. Government. First published in the Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1816–1824) and reprinted in James Mill: Essays & Etc.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1820b] 1825. Jurisprudence. First published in the Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1816–1824) and reprinted in James Mill: Essays & Etc.Google Scholar
Mill, James [1821] 1825. Liberty of the Press. First published in the Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1816–1824) and reprinted in James Mill: Essays & Etc.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1824a. “Periodical Literature: Edinburgh Review.” Westminster Review 1:206–49.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1824b. “Periodical Literature: The Quarterly Review.” Westminister Review 2:463–503.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1825a. Essays on Government, Jurisprudence, Liberty of the Press, and Law of Nations. New York: Kelley.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1825b. “The Edinburgh Review on Parliamentary Reform.” Westminster Review 4:194–233.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826a. Elements of Political Economy. 3rd edn. London: Baldwin, Cradock & Joy (1st edn: 1821). Reprinted in Mill's Selected Economic Writings, 203–366.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826b. “Formation of Opinions.” Westminster Review 6:1–23.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826c. “State of the Nation.” Westminster Review 6:249–78.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826d. “Summary Review of the Conduct and Measures of the Seventh Imperial Parliament.” Parliamentary History and Review (London)Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1827. “Constitutional Legislation.” Parliamentary Review (London) 335–74.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1829] 1967. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. 2 vols. Ed. Mill, John Stuart. New York: Kelley.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1830. “The Ballot.” Westminster Review 13:1–39.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1835a. “The Ballot: A Dialogue.” London Review 1:201–53.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1835b. A Fragment on Mackintosh: Being Strictures on Some Passages in the Dissertation by Sir James Mackintosh, Prefixed to the Encyclopedia Britannica. London: Baldwin & Cradock.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1835c. “Law Reform.” London Review 2:1–51.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1835d. “The State of the Nation.” London Review 1:1–24.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1836. “Aristocracy.” London Review, 2:283–306.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1966. James Mill: Selected Economic Writings. Ed. by Winch, Donald. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1969. James Mill on Education. Ed. Burston, W. H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James Mill: Political Writings, Ed. Ball, Terence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1845. “Review of Arthur Helps: The Claims of Labour: An Essay on the Duty of the Employers to the Employed. Edinburgh Review. 81:498–525.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1861]. 1975. Considerations on Representative Government. Reprinted in John Stuart Mill: Three Essays & Etc. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1863]. 1895. Utilitarianism. 2d ed. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1871]. 1909. Principles of Political Economy. 7th ed. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1975. Three Essays & Etc. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. 1988. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1951–1953. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. 11 vols. Ed. Sraffa, Piero. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel Charles. 1961. The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1972. “Two Concepts of Politics and Democracy: James and John Stuart Mill.” In Machiavelli and the Nature of Political Thought, ed. Fleisher, Martin. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1984. Property and Political Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. 1965. The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. 10 vols. Ed. Ingpen, Roger and Peck, Walter E.. New York: Gordian.Google Scholar
Thomas, William. 1969. “James Mill's Politics: The “Essay on Government' and the Movement for Reform.” Historical Journal 12:249–84.Google Scholar
Thomas, William. 1971. “James Mill's Politics: A Rejoinder.” Historical Journal 14:735–50.Google Scholar
Thomas, William. 1979. The Philosophic Radicals: Nine Studies in Theory and Practice: 1817–1841. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Noel W. 1984. The People's Science: The Popular Political Economy of Exploitation and Crisis 1816–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallas, Graham. 1925. The Life of Francis Place. 4th ed. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Walpole, Spencer. [1889]. 1968. The Life of Lord John Russell. 2 vols. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.