Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-sl7kg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-12T03:11:40.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Talk Really Cheap? Prompting Conversation between Critical Theory and Rational Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

James Johnson
James Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critical theory and rational choice theory share both overlapping concerns and parallel theoretical weaknesses. Specifically, both critical theorists and rational choice theorists are preoccupied with determining what rational can mean in the realm of social and political interaction. I show in a provisional way how game theory extends and deepens the critical theorists' basic intuition that unembellished strategic rationality cannot adequately sustain social and political interaction. And I suggest how critical theory identifies a mechanism underlying the force of the “cheap talk” that game theorists introduce in hopes of circumscribing the indeterminacy generated by their models. My goal is to stimulate productive conversation between what are typically considered discordant research traditions.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 74 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aumann, Robert. 1989. “Game Theory.” In The New Palgrave: Game Theory ed. Eatwell, John et al. , New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Aumann, Robert. 1981. “Survey of Repeated Games.” In Essays in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, ed. Aumann, Robert et al. Zurich: Bibliographisches Institut AG.Google Scholar
Aumann, Robert. 1985. “What Is Game Theory Trying To Accomplish?” In Frontiers of Economics, ed. Arrow, Kenneth and Honkapohja, Seppo. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1992. “Strategic Models of Talk in Political Decision Making.” International Political Science Review 13:45–58.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Max, and Carroll, John. 1985. “Negotiator Cognition.” Research in Organizational Behavior 9:247–88.Google Scholar
Binmore, Ken. 1990. Essays on the Foundations of Game Theory. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 1988. “Emancipation and Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 21:185–204.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 1991. New Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Russell W., De Jong, Douglas V., Forsythe, Robert, and Ross, Thomas W.. 1990. “Selection Criteria in Coordination Games: Some Experimental Results.” American Economic Review 80:218–33.Google Scholar
Crawford, Vincent. 1990. “Explicit Communication and Bargaining Outcomes.” American Economic Review 80:213–19.Google Scholar
Dews, Peter, ed. 1986. Habermas: Autonomy and Solidarity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1986. “The Nature and Scope of Rational Choice Explanation.” In Essays on Actions and Events, ed. LePore, Ernest and McLaughlin, Brian. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. The Cement of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Joseph. 1990. “Meaning and Credibility in Cheap Talk Games.” In Mathematical Models in Economics, ed. Dempster, M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew, and Maskin, Eric. 1986. “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information.” Econometrica 54:533–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1985. “Remarks on the Theory of Communicative Action.” In Social Action, ed. Seebass, Gottfried and Tuomela, Raimo. Amsterdam: Reidel.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987a. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987b. The Theory of Communicative Action. 2 vols. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1991. “A Reply.” In Communicative Action, ed. Honneth, Axel and Joas, Hans. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1992. Postmetaphysical Thinking. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1990. “The Social Evolution of Cooperation.” In The Limits of Rationality, ed. Cook, Karen and Levi, Margaret. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John. 1977a. “Advances in the Understanding of Rational Behavior.” In Rational Choice, ed. Elster, Jon. New York: New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John. 1977b. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. 1989. “Economic Methodology in a Nutshell.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3:115–27.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1987. “Critical Theory.” In Social Theory Today, ed. Giddens, Anthony and Turner, Jonathan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, James. 1991a. “Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action.” Political Theory 19:181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James. 1991b. “Rational Choice as a Reconstructive Theory.” In The Economic Approach to Politics, ed. Monroe, Kristin. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kreps, David. 1990a. Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, David. 1990b. A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1978. The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1991. Ideals and Illusions. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Steven, Okuno-Fujiwara, Masahiro, and Postlewaite, Andrew. 1991. “Refining Cheap-Talk Equilibria.” Journal of Economic Theory 55:247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, Oscar. 1968. “Game Theory: Theoretical Aspects.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 6. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger. 1989. “Credible Negotiation Statements and Coherent Plans.” Journal of Economic Theory 48:264–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, Roger. 1991. Game Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger. 1992. “On the Value of Game Theory in Social Science.” Rationality and Society 4:62–73.Google Scholar
Neblo, Michael. Conversation with author. May 1991.Google Scholar
Orbell, John, Van de Kragt, Alphons, and Dawes, Robyn. 1988. “Explaining Discussion Induced Cooperation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:811–19.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter. 1986. Game Theory and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perner, Josef. 1988. “Higher Order Beliefs and Intentions in Children's Understanding of Social Interaction.” In Developing Theories of Mind, ed. Astington, Janet, Harris, Paul, and Olson, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perner, Josef, and Wimmer, Heinz. 1985. “‘John Thinks That Mary Thinks That …’: Attribution of Second Order Beliefs by Five to Ten Year Old Children.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39:437–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1966. Two-Person Game Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, Eric. 1989. Games and Information. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1991. “Comments on the Interpretation of Game Theory.” Econometrica 59:909–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1967. Choice and Consequence, ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1989. “Studying Institutions.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2:131–48.Google Scholar
Shubik, Martin. 1982. Game Theory in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1979. Models of Bounded Rationality. 2 vols. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1991. “The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing About Mechanisms in Social Science.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21:367–88.Google Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1985. “Habermas on Communicative Action.” In Social Action, ed. Seebass, Gottfried and Tuomela, Raim. Amsterdam: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
White, Stephen. 1988. The Recent Work of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Alan. 1985. “Habermas's Defense of Rationalism.” New German Critique 35:145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.