Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:29:09.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Illustrative Education of Rousseau's Emile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2014

JOHN T. SCOTT*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
*
John T. Scott is Professor in the Department of Political Science, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95615 ([email protected]).

Abstract

Rousseau's mission as an author was to make his readers see what he saw in his philosophical “illumination,” yet his task is a paradoxical one, for he must persuade his readers that they are deceived by what they see before their own eyes and must learn to see anew. In order to transform the perspective of his reader, Rousseau throughout his works uses visual imagery and rhetorical devices invoking vision that represents both the correct view of human nature and virtue and the obstacles to learning to see ourselves properly. As a former engraver's apprentice, he was particularly interested in educating his reader through actual images such as frontispieces or illustrations. The aim of this article is to offer an interpretation of the engravings that illustrate Emile, or On Education, in order to investigate how Rousseau educates his reader through challenging the reader's preconceptions concerning human nature and replacing traditional exemplars of human nature and virtue with a new exemplar seen in his imaginary pupil.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, Allan. 1979. “Introduction” to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Emile, or On Education, ed. and trans. Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Coleman, Patrick. 1977. “Characterizing Rousseau's Emile .” Modern Language Notes 92: 761–78.Google Scholar
Deneen, Patrick. J. 2000. The Odyssey of Political Theory: The Politics of Departure and Return. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. Lewin, Jane E. and Macksey, Richard. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Original ed., Seuils. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1987.Google Scholar
Kavanaugh, Thomas. 1987. Writing the Truth: Authority and Desire in Rousseau. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Christopher. 1987. “‘To Persuade without Convincing’: The Language of Rousseau's Legislator.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (May): 321–35.Google Scholar
Labrosse, Claude. 1985. Lire au XVIIIe Siècle: ‘La Nouvelle Héloïse’ et ses Lecteurs. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon and CNRS.Google Scholar
Mall, Laurence. 2002. Emile, ou les Figures de la Fiction. SVEC 2002:04. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. 2005. The Frame of Art: Fictions of Aesthetic Experience, 1750–1815. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. 1968. The Political Philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, Isabelle. 2003. “Les Illustrations de l’Emile au XVIIIe Siècle: Questions d’Iconographie.” Annales de la Société Jean-Jacques Rousseau 2003. Geneva: Droz, 529–65.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia. 1987. Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Plato. 1998. Phaedrus. Trans. Nichols, James H.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ramon, Catherine. 2003. “Autour des Sujets d’Estampes de La Nouvelle Héloïse: Estampes Dramatiques et Tableaux Romanesques.” Annales de la Société Jean-Jacques Rousseau 2003. Geneva: Droz, 511–28.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1959–95. Oeuvres Complètes, 5 vols. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléïade.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1964. First and Second Discourses, ed. Masters, Roger D. trans. Judith R. Masters and Roger D. Masters. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1965–91. Correspondence Complète, ed. Leigh, Ralph A., 50 vols. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1978. On the Social Contract with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy, ed. Masters, Roger D., trans. Judith R. Masters. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1979. Emile, or On Education, ed. and trans. Bloom, Allan. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1990–2011. Collected Writings of Rousseau, ed. Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher, 10 vols. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth/University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Denise. 2002. “The Utility of Ink: Rousseau and Robinson Crusoe.” Review of Politics 64 (Winter): 121–48.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Denise. 2013. Rousseau on Education, Judgment, and Freedom. State College: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, John T. 2012. “Do You See What I See? The Education of the Reader in Rousseau's Emile .” The Review of Politics 74 (Summer): 443–63.Google Scholar
Sher, Richard B. 2008. The Enlightenment and the Book: Scottish Authors and Their Publishers in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Ireland and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Philip. 1989. “ Julie et ses Legends.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 260: 257–78.Google Scholar
Stewart, Philip. 1992. Engraven Desire: Eros, Image, and Text in the French Eighteenth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Vanpée, Janie. 1990. “Rousseau's Emile ou de l’Éducation: A Resistance to Reading.” Yale French Studies 77: 156–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Penny A. 1993. Gendered Community: Rousseau, Sex, and Politics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M.G. 1994. Signifying Woman: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.